Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 21 of about 1,333 results (0.023 seconds)Amit Kumar Vs. Delhi University and anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Love Aggarwal and ors Vs. Delhi University and anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Praveen Kumar Vs. Vikas Batra and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.873/2012 & CM(M) No.879/2012 27th November, 2014 % 1. CM(M)No.873/2012 & CM No.13222/2012(stay) MR. PRAVEEN KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. B.L.Wali & Mr. Sarul Jain, Advocates. VERSUS VIKAS BATRA & ANR. Through:2. ...... Respondents Mr. I.A.Rahmani, Advocate. CM(M)No.879/2012 & CM No.13331/2012 (stay) SUNNY BERI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. B.L.Wali & Mr. Sarul Jain, Advocates. VERSUS VIKAS BATRA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. I.A.Rahmani, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned order of the trial court dated 17.7.2012 by which the application filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), in a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Chhabra Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and anr.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 2485/2013 PRADEEP CHHABRA ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Harish Pandey with Mr Manish Kr. and Mr Mayank Upadhayay. For the Respondents : Mr V.K. Koura with Ms Paramjeet Benipal for R-1. Ms Prema Priyadarshini for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns a circular bearing No.2003/HR/46 dated 23.7.2003 inasmuch as it denies the benefit of medical facilities to employees resigning from the services of the respondent corporation after the said cut off date.2. Prior to the impugned circular any person who had resigned from services with the consent of the respondent corporation, after attaining the age of 50 years and after rendering minimum 20 years service, was eligible for joining a contributory scheme floated by the respondent corporation for p...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Madan and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:27th November, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 3599/2014 MANISH MADAN & ANR. Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: .....Respondent Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assailing the order dated 24.07.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the Criminal Revision bearing C.R. No.135/14 was dismissed.2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that on 23.04.2005 complainant Mr. Hemant Bishnoi, Chief Manager (Shopping), India Times lodged a complaint stating that on 12.04.2005 one Ravi Arora placed an order for purchase of 256 MB SD card worth Rs.38,400/(Rupees Thirty eight thousand four hundred) and on the same day he had als...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Mullick Vs. Sher Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MAC.APP. 33/2010 Date of decision:27.11.2014 PRADEEP MULLICK Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate versus SHER SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed by the claimant seeking release of the compensation as per award passed by the Tribunal dated 14.07.2009.2. The brief facts are that the appellant Pradeep Mullick on 21.04.1997 while riding his two wheeler scooter was going from Rohini to his office at Srinivaspuri, New Delhi. When the appellant was standing at the signal at Naraina Chowk on Ring Road, New Delhi waiting for the signal to turn green suddenly a blue line bus driven by respondent no.1 rashly, negligently and recklessly at a very high speed, without blowing any horn hit some scooterists including the appellant, some cyclists and another bus. The appellant suffered injuries.3. Ba...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Pahwa Vs. Shri Rajiv Gupta
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC. REV.Nos.474/2013,107/2014, 108/2014 & 110/2014 27th November, 2014 % 1. RC. REV. No.474/2013 RAJ KUMAR PAHWA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.P. Thareja, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJIV GUPTA Through:2. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.107/2014 SH. LALIT KUMAR ARORA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through:3. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.108/2014 SH. AJAY CHOPRA Through: RCR4742013 & conn. matters ..... Petitioner Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through:4. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.110/2014 SH. DALIP CHOPRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Sha...
Tag this Judgment!State of Nct Ofdelhi Vs. Jahir MomIn @ Javed
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4081/2012 STATE OF NCT OFDELHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Navin Sharma, APP for the State. SI Krishan Kumar, PS Lodhi Road, Spl. Cell. versus JAHIR MOMIN @ JAVED Through: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 439 read with 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondent vide order dated 25.09.2012.2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that on 21.08.2012, two persons namely, Ayub and Vinod @ Nadeem were arrested at ISBT, Anand Vihar, Delhi with the purported fake currency notes. The FIR bearing No.19/2012 under Sections 489(B) and (C)/120B IPC was registered at PS Special Cell. On the basis of their disclosure statements, respondent herein namely Jahir Momim @ Javed was arrested on 24.08.2012 and 27 purported fake Indian currency notes of Rs.1,000/(Rupee One thousand) denomination were reco...
Tag this Judgment!Sarfaraz Alam and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4004/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18411/2014 SARFARAZ ALAM & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tabrej Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Krishan Pal, PS Jamia Nagar. Ms. Noorum Nahar, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER2711.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.417/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Jamia Nagar on 14th June, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Sana Parveen are present in person and are identified by the Investigatin...
Tag this Judgment!Ex.Ct.Ranbir Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~17. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:27. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4834/2007 EX.CT.RANBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Gautam Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners grievance is in respect of his dismissal by order dated 07.11.1997; his challenge before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal), after exhaustion of departmental remedies failed. The Tribunal by its order impugned in the present case dated 29.01.2003 in O.A. No.2000/2000, rejected the application.2. The petitioner Constable employed with the Delhi Police was issued a charge-sheet which alleged that he was a member of a team which raided a shopkeeper one Subhash Chand, on suspicion that he was complicit in manufacturing and storing spurious cold drinks. During the course of that raid, 70 crates of cold d...
Tag this Judgment!