Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 19 of about 1,333 results (0.021 seconds)Chetan Mehta Vs. Tulika Mehta
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 27, 2014 + MAT.APP. 16/2014 CHETAN MEHTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Hasan Anzar, Advocate versus TULIKA MEHTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Osama Suhail, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % MAT.APP. 16/2014 & C.M. No.18780/2014 (under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC) On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for parties had submitted that parties are residing abroad and had to leave country on that day itself and so, on their oral request, the parties were permitted to file joint application for additional evidence along with proof of their identity and their residence. The passport of parties were shown to this Court and time was sought to obtain certified copy of the marriage certificate and place it on record. The aforesaid certified copy of marriage certificate now filed by the parties is taken on record. Trial court vide impugned judgment of 5 th December, 2012 had MAT...
Tag this Judgment!Micromax Informatics Ltd. Vs. M/S Fusion Telelinks and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.1128/2014 Date of decision:27. 11. 2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Adv. versus M/S FUSION TELELINKS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Jagdish Vats, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) against the orders dated 07.02.2014 and 22.02.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby CR No.03/14 titled as Fusion Telelinks & Anr. vs. Micromax Informatics Ltd. filed by the respondents was allowed.2. In a nutshell, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner herein filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (herein after referred to as N.I. Act) in respect o...
Tag this Judgment!Rabinder Kaur and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5364/2013 Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 RABINDER KAUR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.D.N. Goburdhun & Mr.Balendu Shekhar, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP for the State. SI Puneet Bharti, PS Sarai Rohilla. Mr.P.P. Singh Rana, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against order dated 27.06.2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the cognizance was taken in case FIR No.370/2012 under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPC registered at PS Sarai Rohilla, Delhi.2. In a nutshell, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that respondent No.2/Jasleen Kaur herein lodged FIR No.370/2012 on 23.10.2012. In the FIR, the complainant has stated that he was married with Surender Kumar on 19.05.2012 and her parents were not happy with the said marriage. On 23.10.2...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Kapoor Chand Thr. Lrs and ors. Vs. Sh.Prabhu Dayal
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.No.384/2011 & C.M.No.17845/2011 (Stay) % 27th November, 2014 SH. KAPOOR CHAND THR. LRS AND ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.S.K.Singh, Advocate. VERSUS SH.PRABHU DAYAL Through: ...... Respondent Mr.Sumesh Gandhi, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 05.7.2011 by which the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act has been decreed after trial and final arguments of the parties.2. The suit/tenanted premises is I-198, Bapa Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. This property belonged to one Sh.Jai Ram who died on 25.8.1968 leaving his property to his daughter Smt.Kalawati. Smt. Kalawati also died on 03.12.1968. Smt. Kalawati...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.137/2003 Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 PAWAN KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Aseem Swaroop and Ms. Suvarna Kashyap, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocate for Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. 59/2003 This is an application for stay. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-assessee states that he is not pressing the stay application. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. ITA No.137/2003 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by the appellant-assessee Pawan Kumar Aggarwal impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 17th September, 2002, relating to the genuineness of the gift of Rs....
Tag this Judgment!Aditya Khinchi and ors Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan and ors Vs. Delhi University and anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Satbinder Singh Madan @ S.S. Madan Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 532 of 2008 & Crl.M.A. No.7563 of 2008 (for stay) Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Decision on: November 27, 2014 JATINDER SINGH MADAN @ J.S.MADAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. And CRL.A. 573 of 2008 & Crl.M.A. No.8034 of 2008 (for stay) SATBINDER SINGH MADAN @ S.S. MADAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the common order dated 17 th April 2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing Appeal Nos. 195 of 2005 and 196 of 2005 filed by Mr. Jatinder Singh Madan @ J.S. Madan (Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.532 of 2008) and by Mr. Satbinder Singh Madan @ S.S. Madan (Appel...
Tag this Judgment!Ena Sikka and ors. Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Mohan @ Mohan Upadhyay Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 14, 2014 Decision on: November 27, 2014 CRL.A. No.414 of 2008 JAI MOHAN @ MOHAN UPADHYAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Choudhary with Mr. Anil Choudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. WITH CRL.A. No.429 of 2008 HARENDER TOMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Pandey with Mr. Kulvinder Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. AND CRL.A. No.74 of 2009 ..... Appellant NAWAB Through: None. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 Introduction 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 16th April 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.36 of 2007 convi...
Tag this Judgment!