Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 13 of about 1,333 results (0.020 seconds)Surinder Mohan Sharma and Ors Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
* + + $~1 & 12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27.11.2014 MAC.APP. 661/2014 SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate MAC.APP. 848/2011 & CM No.17637/2011 (stay) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate Through: versus SURINDER MOHAN SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER % 27.11.2014 JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. These are two appeals filed by the appellant against the award dated 04.06.2011. MAC. APP. No.848/2011 is filed by the Insurance Company seeking recovery rights against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle. MAC APP No.661/2014 has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The brief facts are that on 31.03.2007 the claimant Surinder Mohan Sharma was travelling in a bus. When the bus rea...
Tag this Judgment!Hi-Speed Movers Pvt Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Nct Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3474/2012 & & CM No.12289/2013 HI-SPEED MOVERS PVT LTD. Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Gurpreeet Singh Sethi, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Mr. Arush Bhandari, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.Ajit Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 3474/2012 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the award dated 21.03.2012 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.260/2009 and LIR No.245/2011.2. Vide order dated 30.05.2012 passed in C.M. No.7326/2012, this Court stayed the reinstatement of the respondent No.2/workman, however, declined to stay the operation of the impugned award directing the payment of back wages to the respondent No.2 on the ground that no irreparable loss is going to...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Madan and Anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:27th November, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 3599/2014 MANISH MADAN & ANR. Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: .....Respondent Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assailing the order dated 24.07.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the Criminal Revision bearing C.R. No.135/14 was dismissed.2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that on 23.04.2005 complainant Mr. Hemant Bishnoi, Chief Manager (Shopping), India Times lodged a complaint stating that on 12.04.2005 one Ravi Arora placed an order for purchase of 256 MB SD card worth Rs.38,400/(Rupees Thirty eight thousand four hundred) and on the same day he had als...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii Vs. Jubilant Securities Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 27, 2014 ITA4902014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Madan,Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advs. versus JUBILANT SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Through: + ..... Respondent Ms.Kavita Jha, Adv. ITA4912014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Rohit Madan,Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Mr.Akash Vajpai, Advs. versus JUBILANT SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Kavita Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. These two appeals filed by the revenue pertain to the Assessment Year 2009-10 and arise out of one order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal in short) dated 09.01.2014. The revenue has possibly preferred two appeals as two cross appeals were disposed by the Tribunal by the said impugned order.2. Two issues have been raised in t...
Tag this Judgment!Love Aggarwal and Ors Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Anita Saini and Ors Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Geyir Potom Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Alpana Khandhway and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-14 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 957/2011 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates. versus ALPANA KHANDHWAY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-6. + MAC.APP. 1092/2011 ALPANA KANDHWAY & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate versus BAJRANJ BALI TRANSPORT CO & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates for R-4. + MAC.APP. 991/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate. versus ALPANA KHANDHWAY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ashok Popli, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani and Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NA...
Tag this Judgment!Sarfaraz Alam and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4004/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18411/2014 SARFARAZ ALAM & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tabrej Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Krishan Pal, PS Jamia Nagar. Ms. Noorum Nahar, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER2711.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.417/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Jamia Nagar on 14th June, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Sana Parveen are present in person and are identified by the Investigatin...
Tag this Judgment!M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Ssangyong Engineering ...
Court: Delhi
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1208/2014 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Tanu Priya Gupta, Adv. versus % M/S SSANGYONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Kumar, Ms. Rashmeet Kaur and Ms. R. Joshi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2711.2014 IA No.19623/2104 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP No.1208/2014 1. The short issue which has been raised by the petitioner while laying a challenge to the award dated 16.06.2014, passed by the arbitral tribunal, is that, the direction issued to reimburse the entry tax imposed on the respondent on account of its hike from 1% to 27% by the State of Madhya Pradesh, along with interest, is contrary to the provisions of the contract.2. In order to appreciate the contours of the controversy involved in the present case, the following facts need to be noticed. 2.1 The petitioner had invited global bids for construction of f...
Tag this Judgment!