Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 27 2014

Sarfaraz Alam and Ors Vs. State and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4004/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18411/2014 SARFARAZ ALAM & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Tabrej Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Krishan Pal, PS Jamia Nagar. Ms. Noorum Nahar, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER2711.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.417/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Jamia Nagar on 14th June, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Sana Parveen are present in person and are identified by the Investigatin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Pradeep Chhabra Vs. Indian Oil Corporation and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 2485/2013 PRADEEP CHHABRA ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Harish Pandey with Mr Manish Kr. and Mr Mayank Upadhayay. For the Respondents : Mr V.K. Koura with Ms Paramjeet Benipal for R-1. Ms Prema Priyadarshini for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns a circular bearing No.2003/HR/46 dated 23.7.2003 inasmuch as it denies the benefit of medical facilities to employees resigning from the services of the respondent corporation after the said cut off date.2. Prior to the impugned circular any person who had resigned from services with the consent of the respondent corporation, after attaining the age of 50 years and after rendering minimum 20 years service, was eligible for joining a contributory scheme floated by the respondent corporation for p...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Pawan Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Income Tax officer

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.137/2003 Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 PAWAN KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Aseem Swaroop and Ms. Suvarna Kashyap, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocate for Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) C.M. 59/2003 This is an application for stay. Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-assessee states that he is not pressing the stay application. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. ITA No.137/2003 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by the appellant-assessee Pawan Kumar Aggarwal impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 17th September, 2002, relating to the genuineness of the gift of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Suraj and Ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

$~43 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4354/2014 SURAJ & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 4340/2014 SUNIL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Aneja, Advocate with petitioners. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub Inspector Naveen Kumar, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainants with complainants in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. Both these petitions seek quashing of FIR No.481/2014 under Sections 308/147/323/148/324/149/34 IPC; and FIR No.483/2014 under Sections 147/148/149/323/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Jai Mohan @ Mohan Upadhyay Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 14, 2014 Decision on: November 27, 2014 CRL.A. No.414 of 2008 JAI MOHAN @ MOHAN UPADHYAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Choudhary with Mr. Anil Choudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. WITH CRL.A. No.429 of 2008 HARENDER TOMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Pandey with Mr. Kulvinder Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. AND CRL.A. No.74 of 2009 ..... Appellant NAWAB Through: None. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 Introduction 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 16th April 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.36 of 2007 convi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Rishi Kanwar Vs. Delhi University and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014

Ex.Ct.Ranbir Singh Vs. Uoi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-27-2014

$~17. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:27. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4834/2007 EX.CT.RANBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Gautam Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners grievance is in respect of his dismissal by order dated 07.11.1997; his challenge before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal), after exhaustion of departmental remedies failed. The Tribunal by its order impugned in the present case dated 29.01.2003 in O.A. No.2000/2000, rejected the application.2. The petitioner Constable employed with the Delhi Police was issued a charge-sheet which alleged that he was a member of a team which raided a shopkeeper one Subhash Chand, on suspicion that he was complicit in manufacturing and storing spurious cold drinks. During the course of that raid, 70 crates of cold d...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2014