Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 121 of about 1,333 results (0.020 seconds)Union of India Vs. Krishna Rani Sharma and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h November, 2014 + LA.APP. 169/2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Panda & Mr. Priyabrat Sahu, Advocates versus KRISHNA RANI SHARMA & ANR. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) C.M. No.13943/2013 (u/O XXXXI Rule 3A r/w Sec. 151 CPC & Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act) The stand taken in paragraph No.3 of the instant application discloses bureaucratic lethargy, which has caused delay of 291 days in filing the accompanying appeal. Applying the parameters governing condonation of delay, as reiterated by the Apex Court in Esha Bhattacharjee Vs. Raghunathpur Nafar Academy (2013) 12 SCC649to the instant case, I find that delay occasioned has not been satisfactorily explained. Hence, this application is dismissed. LA.APP. 169/2013 & C.M.No.13942/2013 (for stay) Impugned judgment grants compensation for A category of land LA.APP No.169/2013 Page 1 @ `16,74,500/- per...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Premier Shipping Agencies Vs. the Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7691/2014 & CM Nos.18104/2014 & 18105/2014 M/S PREMIER SHIPPING AGENCIES ..... Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr P.V. Saravan Raja. For the Respondents : Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. St. Counsel. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) CM No.18105/2014 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7691/2014 & CM No.18104/2014 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the order dated 27/29.08.2014 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the respondent - Commissioner of Customs (Imports & General), New Custom House, New Delhi in exercise of powers under Regulation 23 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 (hereinafter CBLR, 2013). By the impugned order, the permission granted under Regulation 9(2) of the Customs House...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Overseas Bank Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Appg.) and anr
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4785/2014 & CM No.9531/2014 INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPG.) & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Padma Priya. For the Respondents : Mr Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Shruti Yadav. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner bank (hereafter IOB) has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:(a) Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari to quash the Communication/Notice dated 16.05.2014 issued by the Respondent no.1 herein, i.e., the Commissioner of Customs, Marmagoa to the petitioner herein as also the communications dated 22.04.2014 and 12.05.2014 issued by the Respondent no.1 to the Reserve Bank of India; (b) Restrain the Respondent no.1 from taking any adverse action against the petitioner in the nature of blacklisting or o...
Tag this Judgment!Kendriya Vidyalay Sangathan (Hq) and anr Vs. Rita Dutta and anr
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 2567/2014 C.M. No.5330/2014 % DECIDED ON:10. 11.2014 KENDRIYA VIDYALAY SANGATHAN (HQ) AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate. versus RITA DUTTA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.L. Chawla with Mr. G.D. Chawla, Advocates for Resp-1. Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The respondent (hereafter referred to as the applicant) was working as Upper Division Clerk in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan (hereafter referred to as the KVS). The applicant was issued with the chargesheet on 12.5.2008 alleging two instances of misconduct. This was the subject matter of proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) which, by the impugned order, set aside the findings of the Enquiry Officer and the penalty imposed upon her.2. The brief facts are that the applicant was iss...
Tag this Judgment!Greater Ashoka Land and Development Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Karan Singh
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) 998/2014 10th November , 2014 GREATER ASHOKA LAND & DEVELOPMENT CO. (P) LTD. ......Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S.Kela, Adv. VERSUS KARAN SINGH ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned order of the trial court dated 16.4.2014 which has allowed an application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 filed by the respondent/plaintiff thereby excluding the period from 20.4.1994 to 19.05.2011, inasmuch as, that period was spent in an earlier litigation for reference of disputes to arbitration, and it was found that disputes cannot be referred to arbitration as there is no arbitration clause.2. Section 14 of the Limitation Act has been included in the statute only for facts such as the present case because where the respondent-plaintiff ea...
Tag this Judgment!Rani Vs. Somnath
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.60/2013 and C.M. Nos.2522/2013 & 16795/2013 10th November, 2014 % RANI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Vinay Gupta, Advocate. VERSUS SOMNATH Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Rahul Thukral, proxy counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the petitioner/tenant impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 11.1.2013 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted premises comprising of one room admeasuring 8.7 X66 in the property bearing no.B-21, Vikram Nagar, Kotla Feroz Shah, New Delhi. I may note that statutorily...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil @ Babu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 03, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November10, 2014 % + CRL.A. 804/2014 SUNIL @ BABU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.P.S.Pradhan, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CRL.A. 854/2014 VINOD @ VINODI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Yashpal Singh, Crime Branch and SI Gorav. Mr.Rajeev Nanda, Advocate for deceaseds father. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sunil @ Babu and Vinod @ Vinodi have been convicted for the offence of murder of Jitender vide impugned judgment dated March 26, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Learned counsels for the appellants assa...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Vs. Praveen Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 05.2014 Date of Decision:10. 11.2014 + RC. REV. No.19 of 2014 & CM No.473 of 2014 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Saini & Mr. Sanjay Dua, Advs. versus PRAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This petition impugns an eviction order dated 15.7.2013 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (Central) in an eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act). The landlord had petitioned for vacation of the premises, being shop No.9813, Ahata Thakur Dass, Sarai Rohilla, New Rohtak Road, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit premises) on the ground that he was unemployed and not gainfully engaged to earn a living, therefore he required the shop for starting a general/...
Tag this Judgment!Tariq Khan and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4300/2014 and Crl. M.A. 14872/2014 (for stay) TARIQ KHAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Vivek Sharma, PS Gokalpuri. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.606/2013 registered under Sections 420/506/34 IPC at Police Station Gokalpuri on 9th November, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Iqbal Ahmed are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer/ SI Vivek Sharma, Police Station Gok...
Tag this Judgment!Parveen Kataria Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5021/2014 PARVEEN KATARIA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravi Chawla, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Satyabir Singh. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.17197/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5021/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR2032013 registered under Sections 323, 406, 420 IPC at police station Rajinder Nagar on 04.10.2013, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, enters appearance and accepts notice. The complainant Ashok Kumar, who has been arrayed as respondent No.1, is also present in p...
Tag this Judgment!