Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Managing Committee, Naval Public School Vs. Neera Chopra and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h April, 2013. % + LPA No.500/2012 & CM No.11726/2012 (for stay) MANAGING COMMITTEE, NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL ...... Appellant Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocate. Versus NEERA CHOPRA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate for Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra Court appeal impugns the judgment dated 1 st May, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5390/2011 preferred by the appellant School. The appellant School had preferred the said writ petition impugning the order dated 27th May, 2011 of the Delhi School Tribunal (Tribunal) allowing Appeal No.41/2003 preferred by the respondent No.1. The said appeal was preferred by the respondent No.1 against the order dated 14 th October, 2003 of the appellant School issued with the approval dated 8th October, 2003 ...
Tara Chand Vs. Land and Building Department and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2710/2013 UMED SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2128/2013 PREM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2721/2013 TARA CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: W.P.(C)No.2710/2013 Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2126/2013 DEVENDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Resp...
K.L.Sachdeva Vs. M.C.D
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1797/2003, IA 69/2012 Date of Decision:29. 04.2013 K.L.SACHDEVA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anil Grover with Ms Noopur Singhal, Adv. for the plaintiff. Versus M.C.D D+ Through: ..... Defendant Mr Rahul Srivastava for Ms Suparna Srivastava, Adv. for defendant MCD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This is a suit for declaration, injunction and damages. It was initially filed against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). Subsequently, vide order dated 02.08.2006, the Janak Park Plot Holders Welfare Society (Regd.) was impleaded as Defendant No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the Society). The plaintiff is stated to be owner in possession of house No. WZ 406/R, Janak Park, Hari Nagar, Clock Tower, situated over plot No. 43 out of Khasra No. 1496, Village Tihar, New Delhi. Land of the said plot is stated to be admeasuring 427.5 square yards. He stated to have purchased this land vide registered conveyance deed dated 28...
National Insurance Co. Vs. Hem Lata Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 901/2011 Judgment reserved on:11. h April, 2013 Judgment delivered on:29. h April, 2013 % NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. Versus HEM LATA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhir Mehndiratta, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal is filed while challenging the judgment dated 25.07.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted the total compensation of Rs.10,10,000/- along with 7.5% interest per annum in favour of the respondents/claimants and against the appellant/Insurance Company.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has mainly argued on the ground that the accident took place on 29.11.2000, claim petition filed by the respondents in 2001 and final award was passed in the year 2011. He submitted that the learned Tribunal took ten years to decide the claim petition for the...
Umed Singh Vs. Land and Building Department and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2710/2013 UMED SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2128/2013 PREM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2721/2013 TARA CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: W.P.(C)No.2710/2013 Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2126/2013 DEVENDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Resp...
Sheela Vs. the Management of Bengal Educational and Cultural
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:5. h March, 2013 Judgment delivered on:29. h April, 2013 % + W.P (C) No. 1709/2011 RAMU Through: .... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Mr. D.P. Singh and Mr. Amit Rana, Advs. Versus MANAGEMENT OF BENGAL EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. for R1. Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advs. for R3. AND + W.P (C) No. 1710/2011 SHEELA ..... Petitioner Through: Versus Mr. N.S. Dalal, Adv. THE MANAGEMENT OF BENGAL EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. for R1. Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advs. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. In both the petitions, noted above, the facts and the impugned order are the same except the dates of termination of services, i.e., petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 1709/2011 was terminated on 15.05.2003 and petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 1710/2011 was term...
Krishan Kumar Nath Vs. Sohan Brahm Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:26. h April, 2013 + EX.P. 303/2010 & Ex. App. 309/2012 (of the judgment debtor) KRISHAN KUMAR NATH ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Rajat Navet, Advocate. Versus SOHAN BRAHM NATH ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT 26 04.2013 % 1. Execution is sought of a compromise decree dated 28th May, 2009 in CS(OS) No.1567/2008 for partition of portion of property No.16/273, Joshi Gali No.9, Joshi Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.2. Notice of the execution petition was issued and objections in the form of E.A. No.309/2012 have been filed by the Judgment Debtor (JD) in which pleadings have been completed. The counsels were heard on 18th April, 2013, to a little extent yesterday, and have been heard further today.3. For appreciating the controversy in objections under adjudication, suffice it is to state: (i) that the defendant No.1 in the suit namely Smt. Tripta Nath...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Sh. Laxman Prasad and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on April 18, 2013 Judgment Delivered on April 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6176/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus VIJENDER SINGH AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.K.S Rana, proxy counsel W.P.(C) 6194/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus SH. LAXMAN PRASAD AND ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel W.P.(C) 7818/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Baldev Malik, Advocate versus ASHOK KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Since these Writ Petitions No. 6176/2012, 6194/2012 and 7818/2012 in...
Rajinder Kumar and ors Vs. Krishna Kumari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26.04.2013 RC.REV. 159/2013 RAJINDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Tanuj Khurana, Adv. versus KRISHNA KUMARI Through ..... Respondent Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) CM No. 6623/2013 (Exemption) 1 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. No. 159/2013 & CM No. 6622/2013 (stay) 2 The petitioners are aggrieved by the finding returned in the impugned order vide which their application seeking leave to defend in the pending proceedings under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 (DRCA) filed by the petitioner had been dismissed. 3 Record shows that an eviction petition had been filed by the respondent against the petitioners under Section 14 (1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the DRCA. The tenanted premises had been described as one shop situated on the ground floor of Kucha Chaudhary, Chandi Chowk, Delhi-110006. T...
Ravinder Chaddha Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % W.P. (Crl.) No. 1658 of 2010 Date of Decision:26. h April, 2013 + # ! RAVINDER CHADDHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Advocate with Mr. Jagdish Prasad, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Anshul Mittal & Mr. Saurabh Balwani, Advocates Versus $ ! STATE NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT The petitioner, by way of the present petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 has sought setting aside of the order dated 19th July, 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge in a corruption case arising out of FIR No. 34/2008 registered by the Anti- Corruption Branch against the petitioner, who is a practicing advocate, and three police officials for their having entered into a criminal conspiracy to extort lacs of rupees from one Abhinav Kishan Aggarwal, the complainant of the present case...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »