Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajbal Singh Rathi Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:25. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 6897/2011 RAJBAL SINGH RATHI Through ..... Petitioner Shri R.K. Saini, Advocate with Ms. Minal Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. versus DDA ..... Respondent Through Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for respondent/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court got himself registered for allotment of a plot from Delhi Development Authority under its Rohini Residential Scheme, 1981. At the time of registration the petitioner disclosed two addresses, one was the address at which he was residing at the time of registration and the other was his permanent village address. The current address disclosed in the registration application was C4A/12C Janakpuri, New Delhi, whereas the permanent address disclosed in the registration form was Village & PO Gangnauli District Meerut. The case of the petitioner is that on his retirement from service, he shifted from C...
M/S. A.P. Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Priknit Retails Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:25. h April, 2013 + CS(OS) No.2467/2011 & I.A. No.15963/2011 (u/O 3.R-1 & 2 CPC) M/S. A.P. POLYPLAST PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. G.L.N. Murthy, Adv. Versus M/S. PRIKNIT RETAILS LIMITED Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Defendant % JUDGMENT 25 04.2013 1. The plaintiff has sued for recovery of Rs.28,96,721.25 with interest till the date of institution of the suit of Rs.12,37,147.86, total Rs.41,33,870/pleading that: (i) that the plaintiff had as per the orders placed by the defendant from time to time sold/delivered/supplied plastic bags to the defendant; (ii) that the defendant has been making payments from time to time and made the last payment on 30th November, 2010 of Rs.1,30,000/-; (iii) that as per the current ledger account maintained by the plaintiff, an amount of Rs.28,96,721.25 is payable by the defendant to the plaintiff with respect to the said supplies; (iv) that the plaint...
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. Vs. Tulip Telecom Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CCP (Co.) No. 3 of 2013 in CO.PET. No. 395 of 2012 AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajendra Barot and Mr. Gaurav Kothari, Advocates. versus TULIP TELECOM LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. G.L. Rawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Rawal and Mr. Himanshu Singh, Advocates with Mr. H.S. Bedi, MD in person. AND CO.PET. No. 395 of 2012 & CO. APPL Nos. 454&455 of 2013 AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajendra Barot and Mr. Gaurav Kothari, Advocates. versus TULIP TELECOM LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. G.L. Rawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Rawal and Mr. Himanshu Singh, Advocates with Mr. H.S. Bedi, MD in person. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 25 04.2013 1. Co. Pet. No. 395 of 2012 was filed by the Petitioner, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. (AN...
Ramesh Kumar Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 787/2012 % Reserved on: Date of Decision:7. h January25. h April, 2013 RAMESH KUMAR ....Appellant Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The appellant Ramesh Kumar impugns his conviction under Section 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) vide judgment dated 23rd November, 2011, for burning deceased Renu to death and causing injuries to her mother Geeta on 31st March 2006. By order of sentence, on the same day, he has been sentenced under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs 5,000/-, in default of which, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for six months. For the offence under Section 307 IPC, he has been awarded rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs 2,000/-, in default of payment of which, he shall und...
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Erstwhile Vs. Randhir Singh and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:25.04.2013 CM(M) 290/2011 & CM No.5243/2011 (Stay) DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD ERSTWHILE SLUM & JJ DEPT ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. versus RANDHIR SINGH & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Anup Kumar Sinha, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (erstwhile Slum and JJ Department) is aggrieved by the three orders; i.e. the order dated 10.01.2011; order dated 09.08.2010 and also seeks a stay of the order dated 04.03.2011. Relevant would it be at the outset to state that in none of the orders, the petitioner was a party.2. Record shows that an eviction petition had been filed by respondent No. 1/landlord (Randhir Singh) seeking eviction of his tenant respondent No. 2/tenant (Smt. Lajwanti) under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRCA) from the premise No. F574, Shakurpur, JJ Colony, Delhi. T...
NiamuddIn Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. NO.155/2004 Date of Decision:25. h April, 2013 + # ! NIAMUDDIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.R. Sharma Advocate versus $ * THE STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: This appeal has been filed by the appellant(hereinafter to be referred as the accused) who was convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 366, 354 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 5th February, 2004 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default stipulation for the offence u/s 342 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one and half years and fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default stipulation u/s 354 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two and half years and fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation u/s 366 IPC vide order dated 6th February...
Ajit Thapliyal and ors. Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 25, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3976/2012 AJIT THAPLIYAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rohit K.Aggarwal, Advocate versus ALL INDIA INSTIUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumit Babbar, Advocate with Ms.Sneha Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG , J.1. It is settled law that on the subject of equality, it is not the nomenclature of the post but a qualitative and quantitative assessment of two posts which determines equality attracting the application of the principle: Equal pay for equal work.2. Petitioners who are Dark Room Assistants working under All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) claim parity with their brotheren working in DDA, ICMR and Government of India Press.3. Whereas in the latter three organizations there is a single cadre posts of Dark Room Assistants appointed by direct recruitment in the pay ...
Marubeni India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:25th April, 2013 % + ITA 1042/2011 MARUBENI INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava with Ms Preeti Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus DIT Through: + ..... Respondent Shri N. P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Ruchesh Sinha, Advocate. ITA 1114/2011 DIT Through: ..... Appellant Shri N. P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Ruchesh Sinha, Advocate. versus MARUBENI INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.C. Srivastava with Ms Preeti Bhardwaj, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.ITA No.1042/2011 is an appeal by the assessee relating to the assessment year 2002-03 and ITA No.1114/2011 is an appeal by the CIT for the assessment year 2003-04. They arise out of a consolidated order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 18.03.2011.2. The assessee is a private limited company incorporated in India under the Companies Act...
Pooran Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10. h April, 2013 DECIDED ON :25. h April, 2013 + CRL.A. 168/2004 POORAN CHAND Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Shekh Israr Ahmed, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.A.No.157/2004 titled Girish Vs. State (NCT of Delhi). (S.P.GARG) JUDGE April 25, 2013 sa file of...
Bhagwan Dass @ Kallu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No. 706/2010 Reserved on:20. h February, 2013 Decided on:25. h April, 2013 % BHAGWAN DASS @ KALLU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal the Appellant challenges the judgment dated 9 th April, 2010 whereby he was convicted for offences punishable under Section 363 and 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 15 th April, 2010 whereby he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of Rs. 5000/- for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and in case of default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month for offence punishable under Section 363 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the allegations against the Appellant are for kidnapping the prosecutrix from a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »