Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. General Electric Com ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 20.12.2012 Judgment delivered on:29. .04.2013 FAO(OS) 554/2010 NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Datta and Ms. Neha Gupta, Advocates. versus GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD. & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr. Ashwath Sitaraman Ms. Natalia Shibli and Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocates for the respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (the Act) directed against the judgment and order dated 18.05.2010, whereby the Learned Single Judge dismissed the objections to the arbitral award dated 07.05.1996 (preferred vide I.A. No. 4860/2004 under Sections 30 and 33 of the Act) and made the same a rule of the court.2. A contract was entered between the Appellant/objector, National Hydro Electric Powe...
Pinki Punia Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :22. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 4895/2011 PINKI PUNIA Through: versus D.D.A. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nishant Datta, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeev Bansal and Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K.JAIN, J.1. The petitioner before this Court applied for allotment of residential flat from Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in its Housing Scheme, 2008. No allotment was made to the petitioner in the draw of lots held on 16th December, 2008. The name of the petitioner, however, appeared at serial No. 9 in the waiting list prepared by DDA, in the category of schedule caste applicants. The aforesaid waiting list was meant for allotment of those flats which were surrendered or became available on cancellation of the allotment to the successful applicants. The demandcum-allotment letters to the successful applicants, who had applied under the aforesaid scheme, ...
Aziz Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.A. 8/2003 Decided on:29. h April, 2013 AZIZ Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Yash Tandon, Advocates with Appellant in person. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Welcome. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the Appellant impugns the judgment dated 9th October, 2002 whereby he has been convicted for offence under Section 20 NDPS Act and the order on sentence dated 10th October, 2002 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine to Rs. 1 lakhs and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that as per the Ruqqa Ex. PW3/D it is evident that search has already been conducted and giving of notice under Section 50 NDPS Act thereafter was meaningless. Even in a case of cha...
Pioneer Properties and Construction Co. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: April 29, 2013 + ARB.P. 329/2012 PIONEER PROPERTIES & CONSTRUCTION CO ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Nishant Datta, Adv. with Ms.Sampath Sudha and Ms.Garima Hooda, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.T. Mitra, Adv. for Ms.Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator.2. On the basis of a request from the MCD, Counsellor Ward No.127, Rejender Nagar, a scheme amounting to `21.92 lac was framed and submitted to the Urban Development Department in the month of February 2005. The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development sanctioned `20 lac for the reconstruction of a chaupal at village Dashgehra vide letter not F.No.18A(67)/5/UD/Chaupal/Plg./2004-05/18900 dated 9th March, 2005.3. In pursu...
Samta Andolan Samiti and ors Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:10. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 04.2013 W.P(C) No.2249/2013 & CM NO.4277/2013 (stay) SAMTA ANDOLAN SAMITI AND ORS. Through : ..... Petitioners Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Adv. with Mr. Paban K. Sharma, Ms. Gargi B. Bharali, Mr. Shobhit Tiwari, Mr. Lal Pratap Singh, Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh, Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal, Mr. Ram Niwas, Advs. Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Adv. for petitioners no.4&5 Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Through : Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC, Mr. Dinesh Sharma,Advs. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution of India, to the extent it is relevant, reads as under:2. Disqualification on ground of defection.-(1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, a member of a House belonging to any political party shall be disqualified for being a member of the House(a) xxxxxx (b)...
Sheo Murti Shukla Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: April 29, 2013 + Arb.A.No.4/2013 SHEO MURTI SHUKLA Through ..... Appellant Ms.S.R. Padhy, Adv. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajat Navet, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant was allotted a retail outlet of the respondent company on 11th April, 1994 at DSIDC Complex, Narela for the sale of its petroleum products i.e. Petrol, Diesel and Lubricants etc.2. A surprise inspection was conducted at the retail outlet of the appellant on 5th November, 2011 by a team of the respondent/IOC Ltd.3. The appellant as a routine practice deposited a sum of `7,66,000/- (Rupees Seven lac sixty six thousands) vide pay order No.139388 drawn on Standard Chartered Bank, Punjabi Bagh on 15th December, 2011 but did not receive the supply till that evening.4. On inquiry from the Bijwasan Supply Depot of the respondent/IOC Ltd. on 16th December, 2011 morning, it ...
Vijay Kumar Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h April, 2013 % + LPA No.337/2010 VIJAY KUMAR Through: ..... APPELLANT Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manu Nayar, Adv. Versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh with Mr. Milava Banerjee & Mr. Arpan Behl, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 16.02.2010 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.18490/2006 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred by the appellant impugning the order dated 19.10.2006 of the Additional District Judge exercising powers as an Appellate Authority under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 20.07.2006 of the Estate Officer of the respondent NDMC directing the appellant to hand over va...
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Vs. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h April, 2013 % + LPA 788/2012 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dr. A.M. Singhvi and Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Advocates with Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. R.K. Mishra and Mr. Aquib Ali, Advs. versus INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. C.M. Oberoi, Adv . with Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 30 th October, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of WP(C) 5011/2010 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the legal notice dated 14th June, 2010 issued by the advocate for the respondent no.1 ITDC to the appellant of termination of the Lease Agreement of property No. C-119 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase 1, New Delhi with the petitioner and the consequent notice dated 1st July 2010 issued by the respondent No.2 ...
Pioneer Properties and Construction Co. Vs. Govt. of Nct Delhi and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: April 29, 2013 + ARB.P. 331/2012 PIONEER PROPERTIES & CONSTRUCTION CO ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Nishant Datta, Adv. with Ms.Sampath Sudha and Ms.Garima Hooda, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.T. Mitra, Adv. for Ms.Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator.2. A tender for the work of demolition and reconstruction of the general chaupal and Naraina Village Delhi was floated. On completion of the tender process, the petitioner was declared as the L-1 agency and was asked to deposit the amount of performance guarantee within seven days. The date of commencement of work was indicated as the 15th day from the date of issue of letter of commencement. Accordingly, the petitioner by letter n...
Prakash Chauhan Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7402/2012 PRAKASH CHAUHAN Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Charge against the petitioner was of mutating property No.15, Rajpur Road in the name of private persons after 20 years of the death of the recorded owner. Additionally, of not ensuring that the Zonal Inspector make the mandatory visit to inspect the property recording status of who is in possession of the property since mutation was applied after 20 years of the death of the recorded owner.2. It so happened that in the interregnum the property came under the ownership of the State of Rajasthan. After mutation was effected in the municipal record, when State of Rajasthan objected the same was canc...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »