Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. Doly Loyi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on April 23, 2013 Judgment Delivered on April 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7960/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V Sinha and Mr.R.N Singh, Advocates versus DOLY LOYI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.S.K Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition by the petitioners is to the order/ judgment dated 07.03.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A No. 3716/2011, whereby the Tribunal had allowed the O.A by quashing order dated 15.09.2011 and directed the petitioners to open the sealed cover adopted in the case of the respondent in the matter of promotion to the post of Commissioner, Income Tax and awarded back wages with costs quantified at `10,000/-.2. Brief facts which are not disputed are that the respondent was appointed as Assistant Co...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Vijender Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on April 18, 2013 Judgment Delivered on April 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6176/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus VIJENDER SINGH AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.K.S Rana, proxy counsel W.P.(C) 6194/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus SH. LAXMAN PRASAD AND ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel W.P.(C) 7818/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Baldev Malik, Advocate versus ASHOK KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Since these Writ Petitions No. 6176/2012, 6194/2012 and 7818/2012 in...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on April 18, 2013 Judgment Delivered on April 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6176/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus VIJENDER SINGH AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.K.S Rana, proxy counsel W.P.(C) 6194/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Mr.Vaibhav Misra, Advocates versus SH. LAXMAN PRASAD AND ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel W.P.(C) 7818/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Bheem Sain Jain, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Baldev Malik, Advocate versus ASHOK KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.K.S Rana, Proxy Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Since these Writ Petitions No. 6176/2012, 6194/2012 and 7818/2012 in...
Ashok Kumar and anr Vs. Sbi Officers Association (Delhi Circle) and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: March 21, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 26, 2013 + O.M.P. No.163/2013 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr.V.K.Rao, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Saket Sikri, Ms.Ekta Sikri and Mr.Sudeep Dey, Advs. versus SBI OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (DELHI CIRCLE) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Tara V.Ganju, Ms.Preeti Gupta and Ms.Etti Sharma, Advs. AND + O.M.P. No.500/2012 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr.V.K.Rao, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Saket Sikri, Ms.Ekta Sikri and Mr.Sudeep Dey, Advs. versus SBI OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (DELHI CIRCLE) THR GENERAL SECRETARY & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Tara V.Ganju, Ms.Preeti Gupta and Ms.Etti Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of OMP No.500/2012 and OMP No.163/2013 filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (here...
Bansal Agrotech Pvt Ltd Vs. Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 04.2013 W.P.(C)No.2691/2013 BANSAL AGROTECH PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.Anil K.Aggarwal with Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocates. versus DDA ..... Respondent Through:Mr.Arun Birbal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has purchased Shop No.3 in Cascade Shopping Centre, Netaji Subhash Place, Delhi from DDA and a Conveyance Deed in his favour has also been executed, thereby conveying to it the aforesaid shop No.3 consisting of 186.620 sq. mtr. No other part of the aforesaid complex has been sold by DDA to the petitioner. A perusal of the site plan Annexure `P1 to the writ petition would show that there are three shops bearing shops No.1,2 and 3 in the aforesaid Shopping Centre. There is a toilet block at the back of Shop No.3 which the petitioner has purchased from DDA. There are three stores as well as a service bay is behind Shop No.2 and 3. The stores are behind Shop...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Pooja Bhatia and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 239/2011 & CM No.5347/2011 (for stay) Judgment reserved on:11. h April, 2013 Judgment delivered on:26th April, 2013 % NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. Versus POOJA BHATIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Harish Chander Kamra, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 29.11.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation in favour of the respondents/claimants and against the appellant/Insurance Company as under:1. Loss of Income : Rs.33,69,600/- 2. Loss of Estate : Rs. 10,000/- 3. Loss of consortium : Rs. 10,000/- 4. Funeral expenses : Rs. 10,000/- 5. Conveyance Expenses : Rs. 10,000/- __________________________________________________ Total : Rs.34,09,600/- (Rupees Thirty four lacs nine thousand six hundred) ________________________________________...
Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. Living Media India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 04.2013 ITA 168/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ..... Appellant versus LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr Salil Aggarwal and Mr R.P. Mall, Advocates. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 01.08.2012 in ITA No. 4406/Del/11 relating to the assessment year 2006-07.2. The facts of the case are that the assessee had filed its return of income on 29.11.2006. The assessment order was framed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the said Act on 26.12.2008. On 19.01.2010 a notice under Section 148 of the said Act was issued by the Assessing Officer seeking to reopen the assessment wh...
Cit Vs. Supreme Polypropolene Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
$~S-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 04.2013 + Rev. Petition No. 215/2013, CM Appl.6579/2013 in ITA No. 266/2011 CIT Through : Ms Suruchi standing counsel. .... Petitioner Aggarwal, Sr. versus SUPREME POLYPROPOLENE PVT. LTD. ..Respondent Through : Mr Sheel Vardhan, proxy for Mr Prakash Kumar, Adv. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: (OPEN COURT) CM Appl.6579/2013 The delay of 25 days in filing the review petition is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. The application is disposed of. Rev. Petition No. 215/2013 in ITA No. 266/2011 1. This petition has been filed by the revenue seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 30.10.2012 in ITA No.266/2011, dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 26.02.2010 in ITA NO.4622/Del./2009 on its file, setting aside the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 of the Act as bein...
Vinod Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on:26. 04.2013 CRL.A. 1470/2011 VINOD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.07.2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of deceased Sanjay on 30.07.2007 by inflicting multiple stabs injuries. By order of sentence dated 15.07.2011, the appellant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of `2000/- has also been imposed. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one month.2. We note that co-accused Kushal was declared juvenile by the Sessions Court vide order dated 0...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Baljeet Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision April 26, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5031/2010 MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate versus BALJEET SINGH& ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.L.C Rajput, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi challenging the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A No. 2572/2009, whereby the Tribunal had quashed the order dated 12.08.2009 issued by the petitioner and thereby directed the petitioner to restore the scale of `55009000 to the respondents as first ACP and the amount recovered be restored back within a period of two months from the receipt of copy of the order.2. The brief facts are that the respondents are working as Pharmacist (Allopathic) with the petitioner in the scale of `4...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »