Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 29 2013

Commissioner of Police Delhi and anr Vs. Mandeep

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: April 23, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: April 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4052/2012 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus MUKESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.L.R.Khatana, Advocate W.P.(C) 3549/2012 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELHI AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.S.Q.Kazim, Advocate with Mr.M.H.Usmani, Advocate versus MANDEEP Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate W.P.(C) 3925/2012 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELHI AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate for Dr.S.P.Sharma, Advocate versus BHAWANI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate W.P.(C) 3932/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS W.P.(C) No.4052/2012 & Conn. Matters ..... Petitioners Page 1 of 26 Represented by: Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate for Dr.S.P.Sharma, Advocate versus HARIPAL ARYA Represented by: ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Union of India and anr. Vs. Central Government Pensioners Association ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

$~5-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: April 29, 2013 W.P.(C) 1535/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus CENTRAL GOVT. SAG & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.K.Ghosh and Mr.Tarun Gupta, Advocates W.P.(C) 2348/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus D.L.VHORA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sushil Kumar Malik, Advocate W.P.(C) 2349/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus PPS GUMBER & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sushil Kumar Malik, Advocate W.P.(C) 2350/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Excel College of Technology Vs. All India Council for Technical Educat ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

$~ 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2472/2013 & CM APPL. 4698 & 5181/2013 Order dated 29th April, 2013. % EXCEL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Bajpai and Mr.M.F. Khan, Advs versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for AICTE Mr.Santha Kumaran and Mr.Yogesh Kanna, Advocates for the State of Tamil Nadu CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of the communication dated 10.4.2013 by which the request of the petitioner for extension of approval for the year 2013-14 has been rejected.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 10.4.2013 is vague and shows complete non-application of mind.3. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, counsel for the respondent/ AICTE, who had entered appearance on an advance copy, has clarified that the request of the petitioner had been declined as the college of the petitioner did not possess a certificate from DTC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Suresh Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. A. NO.699/2000 + Date of Decision:29. h April, 2013 # ! SURESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.J.Bhambhani, Advocate with Ms. Lakshita Sethi & Ms. Bhavita Modi, Advocates versus $ * THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: The appellant had been convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 452 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code('IPC' for short) and Section 27 of the Arms Act by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 13th May, 2000 and vide order dated 27th May, 2000 he had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years u/s 397 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for two years and also to pay fine of ` 500/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment of one month u/s 452 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of ` 500/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment of one month u/s 27...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Raj Kumar Vs. General Manager, Northern Railway

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3655/2012 29th April, 2013 RAJ KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Neha Gupta, Advocate. VERSUS GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Shankar N. Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. Raj Kumar, son of late Sh. Doodh Nath. Late Sh. Doodh Nath was an employee of the respondentRailways. Sh. Doodh Nath expired on 31.01.2011 while still in services of Railways and the petitioner claims compassionate appointment.2. The case as set up in the writ petition is that the petitioners mother was offered employment but she wants the petitioner to get employment with the respondent. Petitioner had approached the respondent and the respondent on 15.02.2012 rejected the request of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in view of the fact that the financial condition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Union of India and anr. Vs. Pps Gumber and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Commissioner of Police Delhi and anr Vs. Bhawani

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Union of India and ors. Vs. Gopal Dass

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7460/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by:Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate versus GOPAL DASS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.K.Shukla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated December 05, 2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in OA No.1301/2011 whereby the Tribunal disposed of the OA directing the petitioners herein to examine and determine the reasons for non-regularization of the respondent and for that purpose if the recruitment rules are needed to be framed the same be expedited in a time-frame. Further, if on account any ban, the petitioners shall consider taking up of the case of the respondent and other similarly placed casual labourers, with temporary status working with them for regularization by having on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Subhash Chand Vs. Land and Building Department and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 2710/2013 UMED SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2128/2013 PREM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for LAC/L&B Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2721/2013 TARA CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: W.P.(C)No.2710/2013 Ms. Swati Verma, Advs. for Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. DDA + W.P.(C) 2126/2013 DEVENDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.S. Dalal, Mr Amit Rana, Mr D.P. Singh, Advs. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ORS. ..... Resp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Shrejee Remedies

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2013

-* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No. 2367/2012 Date of Decision:29. 04.2013 HEINZ INDIA PVT. LTD. ....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra and Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advocates Versus ...Defendant M/S. SHREJEE REMEDIES Through: Mr. R. Bhansali , Mr. Chander Shekar Patney, Mr. D.C Dani, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The instant order disposes the application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short the Code) and an application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rules 10 and 11 of the Code.2. The suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against passing off and damages under Section 27 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 with respect to their prickly heat powder under the trade mark NYCIL. The facts giving rise to this suit are as follows.3. The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office in Mumbai and branch...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.