Delhi Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahant Atma Ram Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 04.2013 RFA 204/1999 MAHANT ATMA RAM Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Maldeep Sidhu, Adv. versus UOI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for R-2/DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The land of the appellant late Mahant Atma Ram was acquired by the Government of NCT of Delhi, by way of notification dated 12.10.1983 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, followed by a declaration dated 12.1.1984 made under Section 6 of the said Act. The award came to be passed by the Land Acquisition Collector on 27.8.1984 and the compensation awarded to the appellant was a laughable amount of Rs.1 per square yard, as against the claim of Rs.50,000/- per square yard. The land subject matter of the acquisition was already in possession of the respondent at the time notification under Section 4(1) of the said Act was issued, the same having been poss...
Sunni Mal Vs. Braham Pakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:30.04.2013 RC.REV. 165/2013 & CM No. 6855/2013 SUNNI MAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Vikas Gautam, Adv. versus BRAHM PAKASH ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 20.03.2013 and 09.04.2013. Submission is that the petitioner was never served with the process on 29.01.2013 as has been recorded in the order dated 20.03.2013. The summons sent by the registered post had also not been delivered to him as was noted in the endorsement dated 19.01.2013 and 23.01.2013 as has been recorded in the order dated 20.03.2013. The submission of the petitioner is that he had in fact been served only on 05.04.2013 and he had filed his application seeking leave to defend on 18.04.2013 which is within time. 2 The order dated 09.04.2013 shows that the power of attorney had been filed by the petitioner. On the same date, he had moved an ap...
Satya Infrastructure Ltd and ors Vs. Satya Builders Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
22 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 483/2011 & I.A. 3201/2011 SATYA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sidhant Goel, Advocate with Mr. Mohit Goel, Advocate. versus SATYA BUILDERS PVT LTD Through: None. ..... Defendant Date of Decision:30. h April, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade marks, passing off, dilution of goodwill, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits/damages and delivery up.2. The prayer clause in the plaint is as under:28. i) Decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its their directors, partners or proprietor as the case may be, their assigns in business, franchisees, licensees, distributors and agents from selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in identical or similar goods/services under the infringing mark/trading name containing the mark SATY...
M/S Chugh Kahturia Engineers (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on :16. 04.2013 Judgment Delivered on :30. 04.2013 + FAO(OS) No.335/2011 M/S CHUGH KATHURIA ENGINEERS (P) LTD. Appellant Through: Mr.Sandeep Sharma and Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocates. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. Respondents. Through: Mr.Suraj Agarwal and Mr.Sunil Mahlotra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The claimant M/s Chugh Kathuria Engineers (P) Ltd. was awarded a work of construction of 96, Type-III, 96 Type-II and 140 Scooter Garage in Block-B, Janak Puri, New Delhi in terms of an agreement with the No.41/EE/HD/VI/DDA/81-82. respondent/DDA vide agreement The work was to commence on 20.8.1991. It was to be completed on or before 19.5.1982. It, however, continued up to 1985; it still remain uncompleted and was ultimately abandoned. 2 Disputes arose interse the parties. In terms of the arbitration clause contained in the agreement the...
Rajpal and ors. Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 04.2013 W.P.(C) 3448/2003 RAJPAL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Vikram Nandrajog, Adv. versus D.D.A. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners before this Court claim to be owner of property not RZ-19 in village Nangloi Syed, Delhi and also allege that the aforesaid property is comprised in Khasra No. 94 of the said village. According to the petitioners, the officials of the respondent visited their property and tried to demolish the same, without following the due process of law. The petitioners are accordingly seeking a writ of Mandamus or any other writ or a direction to the respondents not to dispossess them or demolish their property bearing No. RZ-19 in village Nangloi Syed, Delhi.2. The writ petition has been contested by the respondent-DDA. In its counter- affidavit, DDA has alleged that approximately 200 square yards o...
Manmohan Singh Vs. Kushwant Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. (M) No.268 of 2012 & C.M. No.4077/2012 (for stay) Decided on :30. h April, 2013 MANMOHAN SINGH Through: . Petitioner Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate. Versus KUSHWANT KAUR Through: . Respondent Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.C. Bhasin & Mr. Sumeet Batra, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 13.12.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge by virtue of which the petitioner was directed to pay an interim maintenance @ `12,500/- per month to the respondent /wife apart from payment of `11,000/- as litigation expenses.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the amount of `12,500/- which has been fixed by the learned Additional District Judge by way of an interim maintenance is on the basis of the fact that the petitioner is earning a sum of `50,000/- per month while as there is no...
Payal Garg Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
$~8. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITIOIN (CRIMINAL) NO. 410/2013 Date of decision:30. h April, 2013 PAYAL GARG ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar & Mr. Awanish Sinha, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jatan Singh,CGSC & Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Payal Garg, wife of the detenu Lokesh Garg, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for quashing the detention order bearing F. No. 673/17/2010-CUS-VIII dated 27th August, 2010 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA, for short).2. By the amended writ petition, the petitioner has also challenged the order dated 18th February, 2013 passed by the Central Government after consider...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Central-iii Vs. Manju Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2013 ITA 198/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI CENTRAL-III Appellant Respondent Appellant Respondent Appellant Respondent versus NIRMAL BANSAL AND + ITA 203/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI CENTRAL-III versus MANJU BANSAL AND + ITA 204/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI CENTRAL-III versus NIRMAL BANSAL AND + ITA 205/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI CENTRAL-III Appellant Respondent versus MANJU BANSAL Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjiv Sabharwal For the Respondent : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No. 5523/2013 in ITA No. 198/2013 CM No. 5527/2013 in ITA No. 203/2013 CM No. 5528/2013 in ITA No. 205/2013 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. ITA Nos. 198/2013, 203/2013, 204/2013 & 205/2013 1. These four appeals seek to raise common issues and are dir...
Rahul Vs. M/S. Allied Reality Private Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
#F-1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 914/2008 RAHUL ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ravinder Chauhan, Advocate Through versus M/S. ALLIED REALITY PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Atul Bandhu with Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates for D-2. Date of Decision:30. h April, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present suit has been filed for declaration/cancellation of documents and injunction. By the present suit the plaintiff has sought cancellation/annulment of the following documents :i) Unregistered Power of Attorney dated 18th May, 2004 allegedly executed by the plaintiff in favour of his brother, Mr. Dheeraj, defendant no. 4; ii) CS(OS) 914/2008 by defendant no. 4 in favour of defendant no. 3; iii) Unregistered Power of Attorney dated 18th June, 2004 executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 2; and iv) Sale Deed dated 20th September, 2006 executed in favour of defendant no.1.2. Learned counsel ...
Anil Rajput Vs. M/S Gkb Optolab Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order decided on: April 30, 2013 + Arb.P.No.200/2012 ANIL RAJPUT Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil K.Kher, Sr.Adv. with Mr.D.R.Bhatia, Adv. versus M/S GKB OPTOLAB PVT LTD Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences that have arisen between the parties.2. Brief facts as culled out from the petition are that the petitioner is the owner of the premises bearing not SG-051, DLF, Galleria Shopping Complex, DLF City, Phase-IV, Gurgaon. The respondent had taken the said premises on lease vide Lease Deed dated 8 th December, 2007 which was further renewed on 9th December, 2010 to be expired on 9th December, 2013. The monthly rent is fixed at `2,24,250/-. As per the petitioner, the respondent viola...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »