Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Lal Vs. Vice Chanceller,university of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.1893/2013 % March 22, 2013 JAGDISH LAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. T.D. Yadav, Adv. versus VICE CHANCELLER,UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Adv. for DU. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the relief that he should be considered for promotion to the post of Technical Assistant in the coming DPC.2. The relevant requirements for promotion to the post of Technical Assistant under 50% merit quota are as under:UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (UNIVERSTIY OF DELHI) DILSHAD GARDEN, DELHI 11009 NO.MC/CCS/IV/5/2012 DATED:13. 07.2012 NOTIFICATION The Governing Body in its meeting held on 6th June 2012 has revised the existing Recruitment Rules for the appointment of Technical Assistant under 50% Merit Quota till the University frames fresh Recruitment Rules. The G...
Mrs. Asha @ Aysha Siddiqui Vs. Sh. K.C. Vohra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.3312/2011 MRS. ASHA @ AYSHA SIDDIQUI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.R. Chawla & Mr. V.K. Malik, Advs. Versus SH. K.C. VOHRA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This suit was originally filed by the plaintiff Mrs. Asha @ Aysha Siddiqui as attorney of Sh. N.K.P. Salve and with respect to Flat not F-34, Tara Apartment, Alakhnanda, New Delhi. However upon the demise of Sh. N.K.P. Salve during the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff applied for substitution of herself in his place on the basis of a Will of Sh. N.K.P. Salve with respect to the said flat in favour of the plaintiff and the plaintiff also filed affidavits by way of No Objection of Mrs. Arundhati Upadhayaya and Sh. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate being the natural heirs of Sh. N.K.P. Salve and in which affidavits it is further stated that Sh. N.K.P. Salve had also execut...
Union of India and anr. Vs. K.K.Dawar and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on :March 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1802/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advocate. versus K.K.DAWAR & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We have repeatedly cautioned the Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal not to dispose of Original Applications without notice to the respondents. Such kind of decisions, without notice to the respondents, disposing of Original Applications on the very first day of listing, create problems for the department in the form of stale claims resuscitating. We are noticing that the so-called innocuous directions issued by the Tribunal that either the Original Application be treated as a representation and a reasoned decision taken, or a direction that the representations already made, be decided with reasons, gives b...
Union of India Vs. Reliance Indstries Ltd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: February 15, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: March 22, 2013 + OMP No.46/2013 UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Ganguli, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Mamta Tiwari, Ms.Swati Sinha, Ms.Veronica Mohan, Mr.Pranav Vyas, Mr.Prakhar Chauhan, Mr.Kapil Sankhla, Ms.Meghna Sankhla, Mr.Abhijit Sinha, Mr.Debesh Panda & Mr.Chaitanya Safaya, Advs. versus RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Madhur Bayar, Adv. for R-1. Dr.A.M.Singhvi, Sr.Adv. & Mr.N.K.Kaul, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Neil Nildreth, Mr.Avanish, Mr.Karan Luthra, Mr.Kapil Rustagi, Ms.Naomi Chandra & Mr.Rahan Jaitley, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner-Union of India filed the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Final Partial Award dated 12 th September, 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal c...
Vijay Singhal and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:28. 02.2013 Judgment delivered on:22. 03.2013 + WP(C) 195/2013 VIJAY SINGHAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Vs GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Ms Meenakshi Lekhi, Mr Harish Pandey & Mr Jitendra Kr. Tripathi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Dayan Krishnan, ASC with Ms Manvi Priya, Advocate. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.16 December, 2012 once again heightened the sense of insecurity which women of this city and perhaps in most parts of this country carry in their sub conscious mind. A young lady was raped and mauled in a moving bus and left to die on the street, without a stitch of cloth on herself. Her companion was brutalized and beaten when, he attempted to intervene.2. The news of this heinous and dastardly act spread like wild fire. There was revulsion and disgust at the sheer bestiality of the act.3. People spilled out on r...
Mr. Bijender and ors. Vs. Chairman, Airports Authority of India and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.13489/2009 % March 22, 2013 MR. BIJENDER AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Chandan Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Manya Kumar, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K.Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by three petitioners. The petitioners were appointed as Safai Karamcharis on contractual basis and were working with respondent No.2, namely Airports Authority of India. The petitioners claim regularization on account of having worked as casual employees for about 16 years.2. The Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Umadevi & Ors., (2006) 4 SCC 1 has laid down the following ratio:(I) The questions to be asked before regularization are:(a)(i) Was there a sanctioned post (court cannot order creation of posts because finances of...
Sepoy Brij Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d March, 2013. + W.P.(C) 1917/2013 SEPOY BRIJ LAL ..... Petitioner Through Major K. Ramesh with Ms. Archana Ramesh, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ankur Chhiber, Advocate with Major Mahesh Sharma. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner claims to be aggrieved by an order dated 4th April, 2012 of the Armed Force Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the AFT), dismissing his TA No.101/2010. In that application, the petitioner had challenged the order of dismissal dated 5th October, 2002; and also the order dated 17th March, 2003, passed by the General Officer, Commandingin-Chief, Northern Command, rejecting his statutory representation.2. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner joined the Indian Army in August 1999. Apparently, he had taken 30 days annual leave in February, 2002; he rejo...
M/S Jay UshIn Limited Vs. M/S U-shIn Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 130/2013 & IAs 2313/2013, 2672/2013 Date of Decision:22. 03.2013 M/S JAY USHIN LIMITED Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ratan Kumar Singh, Mr.Nikhilesh Krishanan, Mr.Shashi Bhusan, Advs. versus M/S U-SHIN LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manik Dogra, Mr.V.Mehta, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner initially filed this suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction against the respondent. However, vide an Order of this Court dated 12.02.2013, the same was converted into a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act). The petitioner filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC seeking formal amendments relating to conversion of suit to a petition under Section 9 of the Act. Formal replies to the amendment application (under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC) as well as the petition and application under Order 39 ...
Smt. Vinod Malhotra and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 27, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : March 22, 2013 + WP(C) 8953/2011 SMT. VINOD MALHOTRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by:Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.P.S.Bindra and Ms.Shweta Priyadarshini, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.RaviSikri and Ms.Neha Bhatnagar, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. Mr.L.R.Khatana, Advocate for R-5, 6, 8, 9 and 10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Indian Trade Promotion Organization (ITPO) is an autonomous body fully funded and controlled by the Union of India. It has a hierarchical cadre structure. Instant writ petition concerns promotion to the post of Assistant Manager, and we note that as per the existing Recruitment Rules for the post of Assistant Manager, 1/3rd posts have to be filled up by direct recruitment and the remaining 2/3 rd posts by promotion; and there ar...
Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :27. 02.2013 Date of decision:22. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 4527/2010 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 640/2012 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Dutt, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Mr. Sudershan Shekhawat & Ms. Namisha Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Amarjeet Kumar & Mr. Manish Madhukar, Advs. for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr.Ashish Virmani, Ms.Ritika Jhurani and Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Advocates for Respondents 1 & 2 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 & WP (C) No.640/2012. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WP (C) No. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »