Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Muslim Welfare Organisation Vs. Delhi Wakf Board and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1834/2013 MUSLIM WELFARE ORGANISATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Satya Pal, Advocate versus DELHI WAKF BOARD AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Anjum Javed, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN % ORDER 20 03.2013 The grievance of the petitioner is that Wakf land measuring 2.5 acre situated at Basti Khawaja Meerdard Shakoor Ki Dandhi, Minto Road, New Delhi has been encroached by various persons and despite representations made by it, no action is being taken by the respondents for removal of the aforesaid encroachment from the Wakf land.2. The petitioner has placed on record a copy of the information supplied to it by Wakf Board under RTI Act. The information shows that there are more than 500 families residing at the above referred Wakf property. Out of those, 249 families are paying damage to Delhi Wakf Board whereas 16 persons are paying rent to it. 350 families are started to be in unautho...
Malaria Research Centre Employees??? Welfare Assoc Vs. Malaria Researc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 20, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1554/2003 MALARIA RESEARCH CENTRE EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. ....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.C.N.Sreekumar and Mr.Resmitha R.Chandran, Advocates. versus MALARIA RESEARCH CENTRE THRU ITS DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Rao, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vaibhav Kalra and Ms.Neha Bhatnagar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal pertains to employees inducted in service by the Malaria Research Centre, an Administrative Wing of Indian Council of Medical Research, for eradicating malaria under a UN Funded Project called Integrated Disease Vector Control (IDVC) Project. Field stations all over India were established. Staff was recruited. Being project employment, regular pos...
Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd Vs. Khushal Rawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 323/2013 % Date of Decision: March 20, 2013 FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Adv. versus KHUSHAL RAWAT Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ..... Respondent VEENA BIRBAL, J.(ORAL) * CM No.4814/2013 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM(M) 323/2013 1. The petitioner has filed a petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) before the Ld.ADJ for appointment of receiver, grant of injunction and seeking repossession of vehicle borrowed by the respondent.2. In the petition under Section 9 of the Act, it is alleged that a loan of `35,500/- was granted to the respondent vide loan agreement dated 29.03.2012 for the purchase of two wheeler to be repaid in equal monthly instalments of `1,575/- and the tenure of loan was 30 months. The case of the petitioner is that only 5 instalments were received from respondent...
Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Sajesh Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 2335/2010 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwal, Advocate versus SAJESH SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Petitioner Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) invokes inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) for setting aside of the order dated 17.04.2010 passed by the learned Special Judge-NDPS whereby the Respondents prayer for alteration of the charge and for remitting the case to the Court for trial of the case for the offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (D&C Act) was allowed.2. As per the allegations of the prosecution an information was received from the Delhi Zonal Unit at NCB that huge quantity of bunogesic injections were being supplied by M/s. Rusan Health Care Ltd. to their stocki...
Tajinder Singh @ Kaka Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 796/2012 Reserved on:28. h February, 2013 Date of Decision:20. h March, 2013 % TAJINDER SINGH @ KAKA ....Appellant Through Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE .Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao and Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutors. Through + Crl. Appeal No. 738/2012 BHUPINDER SINGH @ RAJA ....Appellant Through Mr. R.K. Dikshit, Advocate. Versus STATE Through .Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao and Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutors. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellants Bhupender Singh and Tajinder Singh impugn their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Amarjeet Singh on 19 th November, 2007. By order of sentence dated 14th November, 2011, the two appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- each. In default of payment of fine, they have to undergo ...
State Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. Naresh Kumar Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3488/2012 STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Mr.Sahil Mongia, Adv., Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Adv., Ms. Richa Sharma, Adv. Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. versus NARESH KUMAR GARG Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Jawahar Raja, Adv. with Mr. Ashish Sharma, Adv. Mr. A.P.S. Jadaun, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The short question falling for consideration in the instant Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) is whether the offence punishable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (the Act) is bailable or non-bailable.2. The case FIR No.164/2011 was registered at Police Station Economic Offence Wing under Section 63 of the Act read with Section 103/104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 on the complaint of one Narender Singh. The police raided the premises o...
Vikash Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h March, 2013 DECIDED ON :20. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 1370/2012 VIKASH Through : ....Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Vikash challenges judgment dated 27.09.2011 in Sessions Case No.124/2010 arising out of FIR No. 163/2007 PS Welcome, by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/394 IPC read with Section 397 IPC. Vide order dated 29.09.2011, sentence for RI seven years with total fine ` 10,000/- was imposed.2. On 06.03.2007, at about 04.00 P.M., at Road No.65, Pilli Mitti, Janta Colony, Delhi, the appellant was beaten by public and his custody was handed over to the police. Allegations against him were that he and his associates Yusuf Ali @ Pakistani (since acquitted) and Yusuf (since dead) committed robbery on the person of complainant- Satya Prakash ...
Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd Vs. Mohdahtey Shan Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 326/2013 % Date of Decision: March 20, 2013 FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Adv. versus MOHDAHTEY SHAN HUSSAIN Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ..... Respondent VEENA BIRBAL, J.(ORAL) * CM No.4841/2013 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM(M) 326/2013 1. The petitioner has filed a petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) before the Ld.ADJ for appointment of receiver, grant of injunction and seeking repossession of vehicle borrowed by the respondent.2. In the petition under Section 9 of the Act, it is alleged that a loan of `35,000/- was granted to the respondent vide loan agreement dated 15.06.2012 for the purchase of two wheeler to be repaid in equal monthly instalments of `1,852/- and the tenure of loan was 24 months. The case of the petitioner is that only 2 instalments were received from r...
All India Confederation of Blind Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on : March 13, 2013 Judgment pronounced on : March 20, 2013 W.P.(C) 7487/2008 & CM No.13515/2010 ALL INDIA CONFEDERATION OF BLIND ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Roma Bhagat and Mr Pankaj Sinha, Advs versus UOI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. + W.P.(C) 8419/2008 SMABHAVANA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms Roma Bhagat and Mr Pankaj Sinha, Advs versus D.D.A. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Section 43 of The Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights And Full Participation) Act, 1995 enjoins upon the appropriate Government and the local authorities to frame Schemes, in favour of the persons with disabilities, for preferential allotment of land at concessional rates for houses, setting up business, setting up special recreation centres, and for establishment of special Schools...
Indian Ports Warehousing Co. Vs. Bannari Amman Exports (P) Ltd. and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : March 20, 2013 + FAO(OS) 101/2013 JAGSON AIRLINES LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sakal Bhushan, Advocate with Mr.Rohit Gandhi, Mr.Raghvendra, Advs. versus M/S BANNARI AMMAN EXPORTS P.LTD.& ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Indu Malhotra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vanshdeep Dalmia, Ms.Nistha Kumar, Advocates. AND FAO(OS) 102/2013 JAGSON AIRLINES LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sakal Bhushan, Advocate with Mr.Rohit Gandhi, Mr.Raghvendra, Advs. versus BANNARI AMMAN EXPORTS (P) LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Indu Malhotra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vanshdeep Dalmia, Ms.Nistha Kumar, Advocates. AND FAO(OS) 103/2013 INDIAN PORTS WAREHOUSING CO. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Jayant Nath, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Subhash Mishra, Mr.Abhishek Kr.Jha Mr.Sanjay Grovers, Advocates. versus BANNARI AMMAN EXPORTS (P) LTD. & ANR. ..... Resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »