Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Beehive Systems Pvt Ltd and ors Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 20, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : March 22, 2013 WP(C) 7184/2012 + BEEHIVE SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Ranvir Singh, Advocate with Mr.Tileshwar Prasad, Ms.Shruti Kumari, Advocates versus RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Zubeda Begum, Mr.Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms.Aanchal Mullick, Ms.Sana Ansari, Mr.Saket Sikri, Ms.Monisha Handa, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Rajeev Sharma and Mr.Dadyam Mukherjee, Sahil Bhalaik, Advocates for R-2. Mr.Sushil Peter, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was published by the Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Ltd., a Government of India enterprise for procuring VIZrt Graphics System, for Rajya Sabha TV channel.2. Disclosing the intent for the Request for Proposal, it ...
Jai Pal Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.221/2003 Decided on :22. d March, 2013 JAI PAL Through: Appellants Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given). Versus UOI Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(Oral) Review Petition No.173/13 & CM. No.5081/13 1. This is an application for reviewing order dated 7th February, 2013.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. I have also gone through the impugned order. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any error apparent on the face of record in the impugned order, therefore, the application for review of order dated 7th February, 2013 is rejected. Since the review application has been rejected, the stay application is also dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J.MARCH 22 2013 ss...
Anil Kumar Vs. the Chairman-cum-md, Delhi Transport Corporation a
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: March 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: March 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1132/2013 ANIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sanjay Ghose, Advocate. versus THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MD, DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J 1.Services of petitioner were terminated by DTC during the probation period not for the reason that as a driver he lacked proficiency/driving skills, but for the carelessness of a passenger, who left his bag at Terminal 3, IGI Airport and boarded a DTC bus for ISBT. The petitioner was driver of that Bus No.7152.2. The irony is that the petitioner, who initiated action to find out the lost property, has been put at the receiving end perhaps for the reason that out of many associated with the search operation for the lost bag, he being on probation, was the s...
Radhey Shyam Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:15. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :22. .03.2013 CRL.A.1348/2012 RADHEY SHYAM Through: .. Appellant Mr. G.K. Srivastava, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: .. Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The appellant Radhey Shyam, along with Raghu Raj and Giri Raj was sent up for trial under Sections 302/323/324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of Hari Prasad @ Babu, the deceased.2. Vide judgement dated 17.07.2012, the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi convicted the appellant Radhey Shyam for offences under Section 302/324 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a knife and thereby committing murder. By virtue of order on sentence dated 31.07.2012, the appellant was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of `10,000/-was impose...
X (Assumed Name of the Prosecutrix) Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
$-30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d MARCH, 2013 + W.P.(CRL.) 449/2013 X (Assumed name of the prosecutrix) Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Kiran Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The petitioner- X has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking directions to the respondents for terminating her pregnancy and to preserve the fetus for DNA test.2. Notice was issued to the respondents. Status report has been filed and it is taken on record. I have made enquiries from the petitioner in the presence of her counsel Ms.Kiran Singh, Advocate in the chamber. She has expressed her willingness to get her pregnancy terminated. She states that she is unable to carry the pregnancy to full term due to social stigma as she i...
Mohd Farooq Khan Vs. Zubeda Khatoon and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on:18.03.2013 Judgment Delivered on:22.03.2013 FAO(OS) 293/2012 MOHD FAROOQ KHAN Through ..... Appellant Mr. Tarique Siddiqui, Adv. with appellant-in-person. versus ZUBEDA KHATOON AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.D. Ansari, Adv. with respondents No. 1 and husband of R-5-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The plaintiff (Mohd. Farooq Khan) has filed a suit for partition and injunction. He is the son of Abdul Waheed Khan who was the owner of a double storied house bearing No. C-24/A, Block-C, Okhla Vihar, New Delhi-110025. Abdul Waheed Khan had died on 05.08.2006 leaving behind his widow, two sons and three daughters. Defendant No. 1 who is the widow of late Abdul Waheed Khan and defendant No. 5, her daughter are occupying a part of the suit property. Defendants No. 2, 3 and 4 the other legal heirs are stated to be residing separately. Plainti...
Tata Sons Ltd. and anr. Vs. Arno Palmen and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) No. 563/2005 Date of Decision:22. 03.2013 TATA SONS LTD. & ANR. Through: ....Plaintiff Sh. Pravin Anand, Sh. Achutan Sreekumar, Sh. Dhruv Anand, Advs. Versus ARNO PALMEN & ANR. Through: ...Defendant Nemo CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiffs against the defendants seeking defendants from permanent using the injunction against trademark/domain the name www.tatainfotech.in or any other mark/domain name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trademarks TATA/TATA INFOTECH. The plaintiffs are also praying for an order for transfer of the domain name www.tatainfotech.in to the plaintiffs from the register of the Registrar, Key-Systems GmBH, and for delivery-up of all infringing materials along with the rendition of accounts of profit illegally earned as well as damages.2. This suit has been filed by Tata Sons Ltd., a company incorporated under the ...
Mcd Vs. Bhanu Mati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: March 18, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: March 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8006/2010 MCD Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Sobha Gupta, Adovcate versus BHANU MATI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Gopal Datt, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent was appointed as an Assistant Teacher under the petitioner on October 12, 1970 and with effect from January 01, 1973 was placed in the selection grade. With the implementation of the recommendations of the 4th Central Pay Commission, with effect from January 01, 1986, her salary was fixed in the replacement pay scale of `1400 2600. We highlight. This was the replacement selection grade pay scale of Assistant Teachers.2. On March 18, 1994, the respondent was promoted as a Headmistress, pay scale whereof was the same as that of Assistant Teachers in selection grade i.e. `1400 2600. At the relevant time FR...
Mushtaq Ahmed Wani @ Nazeer Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
$-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d MARCH, 2013 + CRL.A. 869/2010 MUSHTAQ AHMED WANI @ NAZEER Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Harsh Bera, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. SI Dalip Kumar, PS Spl.Cell. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Mushtaq Ahmed Wani @ Nazeer challenges judgment dated 12.04.2010 in Sessions Case No.09/2007 arising out of FIR No.91/2006 registered at PS Special Cell by which he was held guilty and convicted for offences punishable under Section 20/21 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 25,000/- and RI for eight years with fine ` 25,000/- under both the Sections respectively. Benefit under Section 428 Cr.P.C. was extended.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 25.11.2006 at about 06.15 P.M. at bus stop near Ramlila Ground, Netaji Subhash Marg, opposite Lal Qu...
Nuziveedu Seeds (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :27. 02.2013 Date of decision:22. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 4527/2010 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 640/2012 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Dutt, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Mr. Sudershan Shekhawat & Ms. Namisha Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Amarjeet Kumar & Mr. Manish Madhukar, Advs. for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr.Ashish Virmani, Ms.Ritika Jhurani and Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Advocates for Respondents 1 & 2 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 & WP (C) No.640/2012. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WP (C) No. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »