Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kuljit Kaur Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.1863/2013 & WP(C) No.1870/2013 % March 201. W.P.(C) 1863/2013 JASBIR KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdeep Sharma, Adv. for R-1. and 2. W.P.(C) 1870/2013 KULJIT KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jadgeep Sharma, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.3557/2013(for exemption) in WP(C) No.1863/2013 & CM No.3565/2013(for exemption) in WP(C) No.1870/2013 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. WP(C) No.1863/2013 & CM No.3556/2013(for direction) with WP(C) No.1870/2013 & CM No.3564/2013(for direction) 1. The petitioners claim that they continue to be teachers in the respondent No.2/school. Petitioner in WP(C) No.1863/2013 was appointed as a TGT ...
Suresh Chand Vs. State Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2882/2012 SURESH CHAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S.M. Hussain, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. G.P.Singh and Mr. C. Siddiqui, Advs. for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER 20 03.2013 % 1. By this petition filed under Sections 439(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner seeks directions to cancel the anticipatory bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 7th July, 2012 and 23rd July, 2012.2. Addressing arguments on the present application, Mr. S.M. Hussain, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was assigned duty by the SHO P.S Sarita Vihar to serve the restrainment order dated 20th June, 2012 passed by the SDM, Defence Colony against Mr. Bal Singh, owner of house No. H-24, Bhawani Gali, Aali Vihar, New Delhi-44 to immediately stop the illegal and unauthorized construction of the s...
Smt. Bala Devi Vs. Sh. Chhotu Ram and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.966/2010 SMT. BALA DEVI Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Hasan Anzar & Mr. Samama Suhail, Advs. Versus SH. CHHOTU RAM & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma & Mr. S.S. Gulia, Advs. for D-1. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff by this suit seeks partition of her 1/9 th share in plot No.11, ad-measuring 250 sq. yds., Sector-23, Dwarka, Delhi and in house No. 227, village Kakrola, Dwarka, Delhi from her father impleaded as defendant No.1 and has impleaded her other siblings as defendants No.2 to 8.2. It is the case of the plaintiff: (i) that she is a coparcener in the aforesaid joint property held by the family of which her father / defendant No.1 is the Karta; (ii) that the grandfather of the plaintiff Sh. Bhe Ram owned certain land in village Kakrola, Dwarka and constituted a HUF along with his two sons viz. the defendant No.1 and Mr. Mukh...
Sushila Devi Vs. Ravinder Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM.(M). NO.332/13 & CM No.4858/13 Decided on :20. h March, 2013 SUSHILA DEVI Through: Appellant Mr. Ajit Nair, Adv. Versus RAVINDER PRASAD Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 12.02.2013.2. The learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any irregularity, impropriety or any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J.MARCH 20 2013...
Asha Bhatnagar Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 06, 2013 Pronounced on: March 19, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3897/2011, Crl.M.A.Nos. 18362/2011, 31/2012 & 13165/2012 S K BAHADUR ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate CRL.M.C. 4060/2011 ASHA BHATNAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Bahadur (husband of petitioner) versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 In the above captioned first petition, challenge is to impugned order of 8th September, 2011 (Annexure P-2) declining alteration of charge in a disproportionate assets case against petitioner- S. K. Bahadur, whereas in the above captioned second petition, his wife is seeking release of her seized cash, jewellery, etc. i.e. items in Group II and III as detailed in paragraph No.9 of Judgment d...
Olive Marques and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:19. 03.2013 W.P.(C) 1801/2013 & CM N. 3437/2013 OLIVE MARQUES AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. E.R. Kumar & Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Asish Nischal, Adv for R-1/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India laying a challenge to Chapter III-A of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) inasmuch as it provides a summary procedure which procedure has been made applicable to tenants, both of residential premises as also non-residential premises; submission being that Section 25-A to Section 25-C which are contained in Chapter III-A of the said Act are unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. A second prayer has been mad...
Shri S.M. Dongarwar Vs. Pec Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) Nos.7615/2008 & 540/2012 % 1. March 19, 2013 W.P.(C) NO.7615/2008 SHRI S.M. DONGARWAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advocate. versus PEC LIMITED Through:2. ..... Respondent Mr. Baankey Bihari Sharma, Advocate. W.P.(C) NO.540/2012 SHRI S.M. DONGARWAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advocate. versus PEC LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Baankey Bihari Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + W.P.(C) No.7615/2008 1. This writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as this writ petition sought quashing of the chargesheet dated 14.7.2006 and the departmental proceedings ensued on that basis, inasmuch as the respondent-corporation has already withdrawn the chargesheet and proceedings on that basis.2. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.540/2012 3. By this writ petition, the petitioner who was an employ...
Centre for Development of Telematics and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 03.2013 W.P.(C) 9016/2011 CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS AND ANR. versus UOI AND ORS. .Petitioners ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Somnath Shukla, For the Respondent Advocates. : Ms Maneesha Dhir with Ms Geeta Sharma and Ms Priya Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr N. P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition the question that has been raised is whether the petitioner (Centre for Development of Telematics C. DoT) is a scientific research association for the purposes of clause (ii) of subsection (1) of section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). If the petitioner is regarded as such a research association, any income of the petitioner would be not included in the tota...
Umed Singh Dahiya Vs. Delhi State Coop. Bank Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.4163/1992 & WP(C) No.396/1993 % March 19, 2013 WP(C) No.4163/1992 M.R. BHARDWAJ & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Mr. Suraj Agarwal, Advs. versus DELHI STATE COOP. BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ishita Chakraborti, Adv. for Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-2. and WP(C) No.396/1993 UMED SINGH DAHIYA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Mr. Suraj Agarwal, Advs. versus DELHI STATE COOP. BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ishita Chakraborti, Adv. for Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) WP(C) No.4163/1992 1. This writ petition is filed by two petitioners. Petitioner No.1 is Mr. M.R.Bhardwaj and petitioner No.2 is Mrs. Kanak Rastogi. The case as put forth in the writ petition is that the petitioners hav...
Ravi Sharma Vs. M/S Omway Buildestate Pvt. Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) 47/2011 SATYENDRA JAIN Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Mr. Tarun Rana & Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Advs. versus M/S OMWAY BUILDESTATE PVT. LTD. & ORS.... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kunal Sinha, Adv. AND + CS(OS) 48/2011 RAVI SHARMA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Sarin, Mr. Tarun Rana & Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Advs. versus M/S OMWAY BUILDESTATE PVT. LTD. & ORS.... Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kunal Sinha, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA No.17660/2011 [u/O 3.R-3(5)] in CS(OS) No.47/2011 and IA No.17661/2011 [u/O 3.R-3(5)] in CS(OS) No.48/2011 (both for grant of leave to defend) 1. Applications for leave to defend the two suits under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recovery of Rs.5,75,17,240/- and Rs.9,94,14,041/- with i...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »