Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parvinder S. Behuria Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 01, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1394/2013 PARVINDER S.BEHURIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abhimanyu Jhamb, Mr.Pradeep Gupta and Mr.Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: : Mr.B.V.Niren, CGSC for UOI/ R-1 & R-2 Mr.Sanjeev Kr. Chaswal, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Caveat No.186/2013 Counsel, as above, appears for caveator/respondent No.3 and hence the caveat is discharged. C.M.No.2623/2013 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. C.M.No.2624/2013 Allowed. W.P.(C) 1394/2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.1. Respondent No.3 would be attaining the age of superannuation on September 30, 2014. He has an issue pertaining to the ACR grading for the year 2006-07 with respect to which he has filed O.A.No.105/2013. ...
Saipem Triune Engineering Pvt. Ltd and anr Vs. Assistant Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 03.2013 W.P.(C) 1037/2013 & CM 1960/2013 SAIPEM TRIUNE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD AND ANR ... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Amit Sachdeva : Mr Sanjeev Rajpal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.01.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, whereby the petitioners application for stay being Stay No. 309/Del/2012 in ITA 5239/Del/2012 relating to the assessment year 2007-08 was disposed of by the Tribunal, inter alia, directing that:(a) WP(C) 1037/2013 The assessee shall pay an amount of ` 50 lacs on or (b) (c) 2. The assessee shall continue to pay an instalment of ` 1 crore per month till this case is disposed of. The ord...
Ester Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 03.2013 + Rev. Petition No. 110/2013 in WP(C) No. 7482/2011 ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD. Through : .... Appellant Sh. R.Santhanam, Advocate VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through : ..Respondents Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing counsel CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: (OPEN COURT) 1. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner in the writ petition which was dismissed with costs by the judgment dated 28th January, 2013.2. We have heard the counsel for the review petitioner. Several arguments have been raised in the review petition. However, after carefully considering them we find no merit in them as we shall presently show.3. The petitioner is M/s. Ester Industries Ltd. The writ petition was directed against the notice issued on 6th March, 2009 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The prayer was to quash the notice as also the order passed by the Assessing Off...
Ramesh Chand and ors. Vs. Khem Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RA No.117/2013 & CM No.3683/2013 in FAO 457/2011 Date of Decision:01. 03.2013 RAMESH CHAND & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants None. Versus KHEM CHAND Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.K. Uppal, Adv., CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) RA No.117/2013 This is an application for review of order dated 21.01.2013. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant-Sh.Khem Chand. Since there is no error apparent on the face of the record as pointed out by the learned counsel, consequently there is no ground for reviewing the order dated 21.01.2013. The learned counsel has only pointed out that the date of death of the mother of the child is 06.10.2007 and not 01.10.2007. The date of death of the mother of the child has been taken from the impugned order, where it is recorded as 01.10.2007. Dismissed. CM No.3683/2013 (For Stay) This 21.01.2013 is an till application the review for stay application of order dated No.117/2013 is decided....
Dabur India Ltd. Vs. M/S. Laxminarayan Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
-* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.S. (O.S.) No. 1190/2005 Date of Decision:01. 03.2013 DABUR INDIA LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Adv., Ms. Mamta Jha, Adv. Versus M/S. LAXMINARAYAN INDUSTRIES Through: ...Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit seeking permanent injunction against infringement of copyright and passing off. The plaintiff has also prayed for rendition of accounts and delivery up of all infringing products with respect to the plaintiffs packaging under the trademark DABUR RED TOOTH POWDER (English) or DABUR LAL DANT MANJAN (Hindi) in respect of tooth-powder, alleging that the arrangement of features, lay out, colour scheme of the defendants container and pouch, is substantially an imitation of their artistic work. Further, the plaintiff prays for compensatory damages to the tune of Rs. 20 lakhs. The brief facts are as under.2. The plaintiff has been manufacturing and marketing DABUR RED TOOTH PO...
Union of India and anr Vs. S.K.Sharma and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 01, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7109/2011 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate with Mr.Vineet Tayal, Advocate versus S.K.SHARMA AND ANR Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. None appears for the respondents even at the second call. We note that the contesting respondent is respondent No.1. The second respondent is the proforma respondent being the Union Public Service Commission.2. Impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal on October 07, 2009 would reveal that O.A.No.2206/2008 filed by respondent No.1 has been dealt with and disposed of by a Single Member Bench. Tribunal comprising: Honble Dr.Ramesh Chandra Pandey Member (A).3. A perusal of the original application would reveal that respondent No.1 had laid a challenge to a penalty order dated March 20, 200...
Bses Yamuna Power Ltd Vs. Babu Ram JaIn and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 113/2013 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. .... Appellant Through:Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anupam Verma, Mr.Nikhil Sharma and Mr.Jibran, Advocates. versus BABU RAM JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through:Ms.Maninder Acharya, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.Jayant Nath, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 01.03.2013 CM No.3682/2013 Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.3681/2013(condonation of delay of 541 days in filing appeal) This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 541 days in filing this LPA 113/2013 page 1 of 10 appeal. Vide impugned order dated 4th August, 2011 passed in WP(C) No.1597/1998, the learned Single Judge held that in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in North Delhi Power Ltd. v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. AIR 201.SC 2302.the appella...
Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs. M/S. Sree Sidh Woolen Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t March, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 559/2012 SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Adv. versus M/S. SREE SIDH WOOLEN INDUSTRIES Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ..... Respondent JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to delete the names of Respondents No.2 and 3 from the array of parties as no relief is sought against them. Heard. Allowed.2. The names of Respondents No.2 and 3 from the array of parties is deleted.3. The Petitioner invokes the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the Complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act) filed against him by Respondent No.1.4. The case of the Petitioner is that he had nothing to do with the firm M/s. Shree Ram Garments & Furniture. According to the Petitioner he simply introduced Respo...
Ms. Archana Agarwal Vs. Chief Secretary Secretariat, I.P. Estate
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J): 1. In pursuance of the Advertisement No.001/2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB), the applicant applied for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (English - Female) [TGT], Post code No.2/2010 (Annexure - A9). The essential qualifications required for the said post, as mentioned in the said notification, are as follows: Essential. A Bachelors Degree (Honours/Pass) or equivalent from a recognized University having secured 45% marks in aggregate, in two school subjects of which atleast one out of the following should have been at the elective level:- 1. English, 2. Mathematics, 3. Natural/Physical Science, 4. Social Science. N.B. The candidate should have studied the subject concerned as mentioned in the R/Rs in all parts/years of graduation. The elective word may also include main subject as practiced in different Universities. The closing date for receipt of applications is 15.03.2010. 2. The applicant cleared the...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›