Delhi Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balwant Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2013 + CRL.A.844/2012 BALWANT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anish Dhingra, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Appeal is partly allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.A.262/2012 titled ARVIND KUMAR @ ARUN v. STATE.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MARCH 20 2013 pst...
Sunil Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h March, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h March, 2013 + CRL.A.562/2012 SUNIL KUMAR .... Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Appeal is partly allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.A.262/2012 titled ARVIND KUMAR @ ARUN v. STATE.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MARCH 20 2013 pst...
Fullerton India Credit Co Ltd Vs. Imran Quereshi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 328/2013 % Date of Decision: March 20, 2013 FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Adv. versus IMRAN QUERESHI Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ..... Respondent VEENA BIRBAL, J.(ORAL) * CM No.4847/2013 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM(M) 328/2013 1. The petitioner has filed a petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) before the Ld.ADJ for appointment of receiver, grant of injunction and seeking repossession of vehicle borrowed by the respondent.2. In the petition under Section 9 of the Act, it is alleged that a loan of `35,000/- was granted to the respondent vide loan agreement dated 24.02.2012 for the purchase of two wheeler to be repaid in equal monthly instalments of `1830/- and the tenure of loan was 24 months. The case of the petitioner is that only 4 instalments were received from respondent...
Gujarat State Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Thapar Agro Mills Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. PET. No. 81 of 1996 GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Advocate for the OL. Mr. S.B. Singh, Advocate for Auction Purchaser/Applicant in CA Nos. 322 and 440 of 2013. versus THAPAR AGRO MILLS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia with Mr. C.S. Gupta,Advocates for ex-Management/ Propounders. Ms. Amrita Mishra, Advocate for SBI Mutual Fund. Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate for IFCI Ltd. Mr. Sanjiv Kakra with Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Advocates for IARC. Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Advocate for IDBI. AND CO.PET. 425 of 2011 IN THE MATTER OF: THAPAR AGRO MILLS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the OL. Mr. S.B. Singh, Advocate for Auction Purchaser/Applicant in CA Nos. 322 and 440 of 2013. Mr. Arun Kathpalia with Mr. C.S. Gupta, Advocates for ex-Management/Propounders. Ms. Amrita Mishra, Advocate for SBI Mutual Fund. Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate for IFCI Ltd. Mr. Sanjiv...
Satish Joshi Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.3215/2012 % March 20, 2013 SATISH JOSHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shree Parkash Sinha, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC for respondent No.1 Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Sh. Satish Joshi impugning the letter dated 17.4.2012 terminating his contractual services w.e.f 17.4.2012. Challenge in effect is also laid to the communication dated 2.5.2012 of the employer/respondent No.2-National Project Coordinator which states that services of the petitioner were terminated on account of inadequate performance.2. On behalf of the petitioner, it is argued before this Court that though the petitioner was a contractual employee in terms of General Service Agreement dated 1.9.2008, however, the service agre...
Shri Vinod Kumar Vs. Food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 3416/2008 20th March, 2013 SHRI VINOD KUMAR Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. S.C.Phogat, Advocate. VERSUS FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ...... Respondent Through: Ms. Nasreen and Ms. Divya, Adv. for Mr. R.K.Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by one Sh. Vinod Kumar, son of late Sh. Samunder Singh for compassionate employment with the respondent-Food Corporation of India. The claim of compassionate employment is on the ground that the father of the petitioner late Sh. Samunder Singh died in harness on 19.5.2003. The petitioner places reliance upon a report dated 19.11.2003 of a committee of the respondent which recommended appointment to a family member of late Sh. Samunder Singh.2. The respondent has contested the petition. There are two basic defences which are laid out. The first defence is that compassionate employment...
Tvs Net Technologies Ltd. Vs. Telecomunication Consultant India Ltd. a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2013 + I.A. No.763/2013 in OMP.No.699/2009 TVS NET TECHNOLOGIES LTD. .....Petitioner Through Mr. Ruchin Midha Adv. versus TELECOMUNICATION CONSULTANT INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through Mr. P.K Bansal, Adv for R-1. Mr.Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv. with Mr. Kartika Sharma, Adv. for R-2. Mr.G.L.Rawal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kuljeet Rawal,Adv. for applicant in I.A. No.763/2013. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The abovementioned application has been filed by Tulip Telecom Limited under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for grant of interim measures.2. Brief facts of the application are that Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) floated tenders for supply of certain IT and Networking Equipments, support services etc. The said order was placed by BSNL on respondent No. 1 which is also a public sector undertaking under the department of Telecommunication, Governmen...
Deepak Kumar @ Deepu Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :20. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 1092/2010 & CRL.M.A.12522/2012 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPU ....Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant- Deepak Kumar @ Deepu S/o Bharat Singh challenges judgment dated 16.08.2010 in Sessions Case No.89/2008 arising out of FIR No. 194/2004 PS Shahdara, by which, he and his associates were convicted and sentenced. The appellant was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/394/411/34 IPC. Vide order dated 19.08.2010, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years under Section 394/34 IPC with fine ` 3,000/- and RI for three years under Section 411 IPC.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on the night intervening 09/10.06.2004 at 12.30 A.M. near Hanuman Mandir, Shahdara, the appellant and his associates Sanjay, Harish Kumar @ Pintu, Rohtash and Deepak S/o ...
Rajat Khanna and anr. Vs. R.P. Khanna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.784/2012 RAJAT KHANNA & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Adv. Versus R.P. KHANNA & ORS. Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Defendants RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff No.1 seeks partition of property not B-6/7, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi from his father defendant No.1 and has impleaded his fathers siblings / their heirs as defendants No.2 to 13.2. It is the case of the plaintiff No.1 in the plaint: (i) that his grandfather Late Sh. O.P. Khanna was the exclusive owner of the said property; (ii) that the grandfather Sh. O.P. Khanna died intestate on 24.09.1985, leaving a widow Smt. Kamla Rani Khanna, three sons viz. the defendants No.1&2 and Sh. R.K. Khanna being the predecessor of defendants No.4, 5 & 13 and two daughters viz. defendant No.3 & Smt. Achala Mehta, predecessor of defendants No.6 to 8; (iii) that on the...
Sudershan Bhagra Vs. Delhi Cantt. Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 6574/2008 20th March, 2013 SUDERSHAN BHAGRA Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. S.C.Singhal, and Mr. Mridul Chawla, Advocates. VERSUS DELHI CANTT. BOARD Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks release of the entire superannuation benefits and pension from the respondent-Delhi Cantt. Board. Petitioner claims the release of the terminal benefits in spite of the fact that the petitioner most contumaciously and obdurately has refused to vacate the accommodation given to the petitioner by the respondent on account of employment of the petitioner with the respondent, originally as a teacher and thereafter as a Head Mistress. I note that the petitioner has retired way back on 30.11.2001, however she continues to hold the accommodation given to her during her service and has n...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »