Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Devender Solanki Vs. D.D.a and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:31. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 6833/2012 DEVENDER SOLANKI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhu Sudhan Bhayana, Adv. versus D.D.A AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna and Mr. D.P. Senwal, Advocates for DJB CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the residents of Sectors 20 to 25 of Rohini Residential Scheme, which have been developed by respondent No. 1Delhi Development Authority, are not being provided water by respondent No. 2Delhi Jal Board, as a result of which they have to procure water from private vendors or from DDA through water tankers. According to the petitioner, the residents of these areas, besides paying water bills to DDA, are also incurring expenditure of about Rs 1,000/- per month on obtaining water from private sources and the supply of water by DDA through tankers is erratic, beside...
M/S Canon India Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S K.T. Holidays Pvt Ltd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 31, 2013 + OMP No.700/2012 M/S CANON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amar Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Divyam Agarwal, Adv. versus M/S K.T.HOLIDAYS PVT LT D& ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Adv. + OMP No.701/2012 M/S CANON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amar Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Divyam Agarwal, Adv. versus M/S K.T.HOLIDAYS PVT LT D& ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Adv. + OMP No.702/2012 M/S CANON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amar Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Divyam Agarwal, Adv. versus M/S K.T.HOLIDAYS PVT LT D& ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Adv. + OMP No.703/2012 M/S CANON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amar Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Divyam Agarwal, Adv. versus M/S K.T.HOLIDAYS PVT LT D& ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petiti...
Narsingh Prasad Roy Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P (C) No. 4343/2010 % Judgment reserved on:31. t October, 2012 Judgment delivered on:31. t January, 2013 NARSINGH PRASAD ROY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. I.C. Mishra and Ms. Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. Versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Senior Central Government Counsel with Mr. R.N. Singh Mr. P.K.Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates for Respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Gopal Singh and Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.3/State of Bihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant petition has been filed against the impugned letter dated 25.02.1994 whereby the application of the petitioner filed under SSS Pension Scheme, 1980 has been rejected.2. The case of the petitioner is that he had participated in Quit India Movement, 1942 on the call of Gandhiji, Rajendra Babu, Janaki Babu and other senior leaders. For this purpose, the petitioner had quit his school and participated in the sai...
Manu Raj Bhalla Vs. Smt. Renu Dhawan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t January, 2013 % + TEST.CAS.73/2008 MANU RAJ BHALLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus SMT. RENU DHAWAN & ORS. Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This petition, under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeks probate of the Will dated 06.09.2006 of Shri Narinder Mohan, son of Late Shri Yadeo Nath Parti, resident of 6C, Dimple Court, 26 Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-110 017.2. The petition states, that the deceased was a unmarried Hindu and died at Delhi on 04.10.2006; that the deceased was residing at Kolkata with the father of the petitioner and used to visit Delhi from time to time where he used to reside with the petitioner in Sainik Farms, New Delhi; that the petitioner is the nephew of the deceased and the only beneficiary of the Will aforesaid executed by the deceased at Kolkata; that the deceased had also appointed ...
Aar Tee Tranport Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner, Department of Trade an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 7259/2012 AAR TEE TRANPORT CO. PVT. LTD .... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ORS. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajesh Mahna with Mr.Ruchir Bhatia For the Respondents : Mr Vineet Bhatia CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM 18700/2012 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM 689/2013 This is an application for amendment of the writ petition as mentioned in the previous order. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the amendments being carried out. Consequently, this application is allowed. The amended writ petition, which is annexed along with this application, is taken on record. This application is disposed of. WP(C) 7259/2012 1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parti...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors Vs. Saroj Khosla and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : January 28, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : January 31, 2013 W.P.(C) 4370/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Mr.Nitesh Singh, Ms.Nazoo Sharma, Advocates. versus SAROJ KHOSLA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.G.S.Vasisht, Advocate with Mr.Smriti Vasishst, Advocate for R.1 to 3. AND W.P.(C) 5145/2012 GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Mr.Nitesh Singh, Ms.Nazoo Sharma, Advocates. versus VEENA SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent None. AND W.P.(C) 5949/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Mr.Nitesh Singh, Ms.Nazoo Sharma, Advocates. versus VIR SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: None. AND W.P.(C) 6507/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitio...
Chander Kirti Rani Tandon Vs. M/S Vxl Lodging N Boarding Services Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2591/2011 + Reserved on: Date of decision:14. 12.2012 31.01.2013 IN THE MATTER OF: CHANDER KIRTI RANI TANDON ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Ms. Jibran Tak, Advocate versus M/S VXL LODGING N BOARDING SERVICES PVT LTD Through: None ..... Defendant CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit against the defendant for possession of the first and second floors of the residential premises bearing not S-20, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi, and for recovery of arrears of rent to the tune of `7,25,000/-, apart from future damages w.e.f. October, 2011, for the illegal use and occupation of the demised premises alongwith interest thereon.2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is the owner/landlady of premises bearing not S-20, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi, and is residing on the ground floor. As per the plaintiff, Shri Ajay Kapoor, Director of the def...
Sushil Kumar Gupta Vs. Smt. Prem Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:31. 01.2013 + EFA (OS) No.6 of 2012 SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA Through: .APPELLANT Mr. Suryakant Singla, Adv. Versus SMT. PREM GUPTA & ORS. Through: ....RESPONDENTS Mr. H.L. Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Adv. for R-10. Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda, Adv. for Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel, GNCTD. Mr. Satinder Singh, LDC from the O/o the Collector of Stamps. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) 1. The Gupta family was carrying on business under a partnership firm known as Deoki Nandan & Sons. Disputes arose inter se the family members including qua immovable property where the parties were residing known as 1, Tughlak Lane, New Delhi. A reference was made vide order dated 18.11.1985 in Suit No.2164A/1985 for resolution of disputes to the sole arbitration of Mr. Justice Jaswant Singh (Retd.) who made and published an award dated 8.6.1988. One of the issues fra...
Zile Singh Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
$~R9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 1117/2007 ZILE SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Rajiv Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ORS..... Respondents Through : Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates for DDA Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for LAC/Nodal Officer Mr. Digvijay Rai, Standing counsel for AAI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 31.01.2013 This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.05.2012 dismissing the WP(C) 304/2007 filed by the appellant. Dismissing the writ petition, the learned Single Judge inter alia held as under:65. 2 The facts in brief are that the petitioners Sh. Zile Singh and Sh. Nafe Singh both sons of late Sh. Mehar Singh are residents of village Nangal Devat. It is stated that as per the records Sh Mehar singh was the owner and was in possession of land measuring 169 sq. yds and 276 sq. yds in khasra No. 1243 an...
S.K.Taqi Vs. the Cement Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
$~58. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:31. 01.2013 % W.P.(C) No.7748/2010 S.K.TAQI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.Y. Khan, Advocate versus THE CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the industrial award passed by the Labour Court dated 31.03.2010 in ID No.2323/95, whereby the Labour Court X has answered the following reference made by the appropriate government against the petitioner/workman: Whether the dismissal of services of Shri S.K. Taqi is illegal and/or unjustified, and if so, to what directions are necessary in this regard? 2. The petitioner also assails the order dated 07.11.2009 passed by the Labour Court in the course of the proceedings before it, whereby the Labour Court has ruled that the departmental enquiry conducted against t...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »