Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiv Bachan and ors. Vs. Ayodhya Textile Mill and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3339/2007 Reserved on:8. h November, 2012 Decided on:28. h January, 2013 % SHIV BACHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rama Shankar with Mr. Shivan Garg, Advocate versus AYODHYA TEXTILE MILL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Advocate HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present petition the Petitioners impugn the award dated 31 st March, 2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court in the ID No. 354/1995 wherein the learned Labour Court although held that the services of the workmen were terminated illegally and unjustifiably by the Management however, awarded a lump sum compensation of Rs. 40,000/- in favour of each Petitioner in lieu of reinstatement with full back wages.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners contends that in similar industrial dispute involving other employees of the Respondent bearing ID No. 277/1993 the Labour Court had directed the Respondent to pay arrears of back wages...
M/S Shree Ram Buildwell Pvt Ltd Vs. I and Fc Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 22, 2013 Judgment delivered on: January 28, 2013 + Arb.P.No.326/2012 M/S SHREE RAM BUILDWELL PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Avinash K.Trivedi, Adv. versus I & FC DEPARTMENT Through ..... Respondent Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. with Mr.Durgesh Hooda, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner, M/s Shree Ram Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. has filed the present petition against the respondent, I & FC Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an impartial arbitrator to adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties.2. It is alleged by the petitioner that the petitioner has executed the work after 4th January, 2011 of an amount of `17,50,000/- out of which the respondent has recorded the measurement in MB and paid `14,56,000/-. The balance amount of the work of `2,94,000/- is not recorded and paid by the respondent....
Charan Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. 01.2013 + W.P.(C) 464/2013 CHARAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Joginder Tuli and Sh. Ashu Kumar Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. APPL. 898/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 464/2013 1. Issue notice. Sh. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC accepts notice and states that the petition may be disposed of at this stage without filing counter affidavit.2. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) dated 25.06.2011 whereby he was dismissed from service. The petitioner was appointed as Constable by the CISF with effect from 08.04.1994. At the time of recruitment, he held himself out to be a Scheduled Caste (SC) candidate and relied W.P.(C)464/2013 Page 1 upon a certificate dated ...
Dinesh Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :24. h January, 2013 DECIDED ON :28. h January, 2013. + CRL.A.No.427/2010 DINESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Dinesh impugns the judgment dated 09.10.2009 and order on sentence dated 13.10.2009 of learned Additional Sessions Judge by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(f) IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `5,000/- 2. Allegations against the appellant were that he committed rape upon the prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged three years in his house on 22.03.2008 at about 04:00 P.M. The prosecution examined ten witnesses. In his statement recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. the appellant pleaded false implication. He examined himself in defence and stated that...
Texmaco Limited Vs. the Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: January 28, 2013 + CS(OS) No.1439/1991 TEXMACO LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sumit Sen, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.V.P.Dewan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the abovementioned suit for the recovery of `46,62,917.81/- against the defendants, alleging that the said amount is due and payable to the plaintiff under a contract relating to the work which includes a sum of `32,96,972/- on account of reimbursement of sales tax illegally withheld by the defendants and a further amount of `13,65,945.81/is also payable by the defendants as per details mentioned in para 16 of the plaint.2. Before referring the facts made by the plaintiff in its plaint, there are certain admitted relevant facts and events which are admitted, the same are: (a) On 8th January, 1983, a Contract Agreement bearing not NH/CPG/MC/S-G/2 AGMT for design, f...
Sushil Kumar Vs. Sanjay
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of order:- 28.01.2013 CM(M) 104/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate. versus SANJAY ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) C.M.No.1367/2013 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM(M) 104/2013 and C.M.No.1366/2013 (interim relief) 1. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the order dated 06.10.2012 passed by the learned District Judge-III (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in MCA No.1/12 vide which the order dated 26.05.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge was affirmed and the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. In brief the facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent herein filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction claiming himself to be the owner and in possession of House not D-598, Gali No.1, Ashok Nagar, Sha...
Mohd Akram Alias Pappu and anr. Vs. Bilkish Begum
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. NO.16 OF 201.Decided on :28. h January , 2013 MOHD AKRAM ALIAS PAPPU & ANR. Appellants Through: Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate. Versus BILKISH BEGUM Through: Respondent Mr. S.K. Khatri, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment dated 17.12.2011 passed by Sh. S.S. Malhotra, learned ADJ, Karkardooma Courts in RCA No.80/11.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent, Bilkish Begum, filed a suit for possession, mesne profits and damages against the appellants herein in respect of premises not B-227, Ground Floor, Gali No.3, Mandawali Fazalpur, Delhi-110092 consisting of one room measuring 10 x 15 and kitchen 5 x 10 more particularly shown in red in the site plan. The respondent had also prayed for recovery of user charges/mesne profits from the appellants @ `2,500/- per month with effect from 1.8.2008 till the end of Feb...
Dda Vs. SachIn J. Joshi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17th October, 2012 Date of Decision:28. h January, 2013 % + L.P.A. 393/2012 DDA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shobhana T versus SACHIN J.JOSHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Trideep Pais and Mr. Shivam Sharma and Mr. Natasha Sahrawat, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal from the judgment of a learned single judge of this court in W.P (C) No.8496/2008 rendered on 02.02.2012 on a writ petition filed by Sachin Joshi, for and on behalf of M/s. Asrani Inns & Resorts Private Limited, (hotel) against the order passed by the Lieutenant Governor, Delhi, (LG) acting as competent authority of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), on 10.04.2008 refusing permission to the hotel (petitioner in the writ petition) to amalgamate two hotel-plots at Wazirpur District Centre which were acquired by it under an a...
Dr.(Mrs.) Sur Bala Obeja Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 23, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on : January 28, 2013 + WP(C) 4952/2001 DR.(MRS.) SUR BALA OBEJA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Employed on a temporary basis as a Ayurvedic Physician in the Central Government Health Scheme on January 01, 1982 and being declared quasi-permanent the petitioner sought for and was granted leave on May 09, 1986 till June 02, 1986 as she had to proceed to Riyadh where her husband was employed and once in Riyadh she kept on sending applications with medical opinions recording she being unwell and this continued till August 18, 1989. We highlight that the petitioner remained unauthorizedly absent from June 03, 1986 till August 18, 1989 i.e. for a period of 3 years, 2 months...
P.D. Gupta and anr. Vs. Ece Industries Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 1444/2012 P.D. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Amrita Sharma, Adv. versus ECE INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dilraj Kumar, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Petition is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in CRL.M.C.1443/2012 titled P.D.GUPTA & ANR. v. ECE INDUSTRIES LTD.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE JANUARY 24 2013 vk...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »