Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devender Kumar Vs. Secy. Labour, Govt. of Nct and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No. 4330/1997 Reserved on:17. h October, 2012 Decided on:28. h January, 2013 % MGT. OF DELHI FINANCIAL CORPN. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. versus P.O. LABOUR COURT & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. M.M. Saquib, Advs. for R-2. W.P. (C) No. 75/1998 DEVENDER KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. M.M. Saquib, Advs. versus SECY. LABOUR, GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. for R-3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By these petitions both the parties have challenged the impugned award dated 14th February, 1997 whereby the termination of workman Devender Kumar was held to be illegal and unjustified and the management was directed to pay lump-sum compensation of Rs. 50,000/- to the workman. In W.P.(C) 4330/1997, the order dated 7th May, 1997 has also been challenged whereby the review application of the management was dismissed.2. The gri...
Kamla Vs. Rati Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.M.C. 2263/2010 Date of Decision:28. h January, 2013 + # ! KAMLA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Garg, Advocate Versus $ * RATI RAM Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C.) against the order dated 25th February, 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the order dated 22nd October, 2009 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in complaint case no. 237/2008 for granting interim maintenance @ ` 4000 to her from the date of filing application for interim maintenance was modified by altering the date of payment to the date of service of the respondent-husband in the main petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C.2. The brief facts of the case were noticed by the learned Magistrate in her order as under:2. The petitioner, wife of the respondent...
Rajesh Gouhari and anr Vs. N.S. Padmanabhan and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 799/2012 & CMs 20352/2012, 20353/2012, 20354/2012 and 20354/2012 RAJESH GOUHARI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Pyoli, Advocate versus N.S. PADMANABHAN & ANR Through: None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 28 01.2013 % Respondent no.2 Educational Consultants India Ltd issued a Memorandum to respondent no.1 Mr. N.S. Padmanabhan, on 5.1.2009, seeking his clarification on a complaint made against him in respect of appointment to the post of Manager (Finance) in respondent no.2. He submitted his reply dated 30.01.2009 and refuted the allegations made against him. It appears that the complaint against respondent No. 1 was also investigated by the Chief Vigilance Officer of respondent no.2 and a report dated 27.3.2009 was submitted by him to respondent no.2.2. Vide order dated 14.7.2009, the CMD of respondent no.1, who was also the Disciplinary Authority in his case accepted the clari...
Ester Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h November, 2012. Date of Decision :28. h January, 2013. % + WP(C) No.7482/2011 ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD. .... Appellant Through : Mr. R. Santhanam, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 reopening the assessment issued on 6-3-2009 and seeks quashing of the same as also the order passed on 23-92011 pursuant to the notice, rejecting the petitioners objections.2. In respect of the assessment year 2004-05, the assessment of the petitioner, which is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of polyester chips and film, to income-tax was first completed on 30-11-2006 under section 143(3) of the Act. It was sought to be reopened by issue of...
M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd and anr Vs. M/S Teltech Instrumentation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 28, 2013 + OMP No.59/2013 M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Debasish Moitra, Adv. versus M/S TELTECH INSTRUMENTATION PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tanuj Khurana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioners have filed the abovementioned petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award of `54,48,321/-, dated 31st October, 2012 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.2. In the petition, it is stated that in the year 1998, the petitioners invited Tender bearing not ENG/PT/376/98 for design, supply, testing, installation and commissioning of automation of drawing trucks, filling system and motorized operated valves with remote operation facility at its Bijwasan Terminal. It must be clarified that under Clause 9 of the said Tender, the respondents had to unde...
Mgt. of Delhi Financial Corpn. Vs. P.O. Labour Court and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No. 4330/1997 Reserved on:17. h October, 2012 Decided on:28. h January, 2013 % MGT. OF DELHI FINANCIAL CORPN. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. versus P.O. LABOUR COURT & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. M.M. Saquib, Advs. for R-2. W.P. (C) No. 75/1998 DEVENDER KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. M.M. Saquib, Advs. versus SECY. LABOUR, GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. for R-3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By these petitions both the parties have challenged the impugned award dated 14th February, 1997 whereby the termination of workman Devender Kumar was held to be illegal and unjustified and the management was directed to pay lump-sum compensation of Rs. 50,000/- to the workman. In W.P.(C) 4330/1997, the order dated 7th May, 1997 has also been challenged whereby the review application of the management was dismissed.2. The gri...
Rajesh Kumar Verma Vs. High Court of Delhi Through Registrar General
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 207/2013 Reserved on:21. t January, 2013 Date of Decision:28. h January, 2013 % Rajesh Kumar Verma Through ....Petitioner IN PERSON Versus High Court of Delhi through Registrar General Respondent Through Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Advocate. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 337/2013 Reserved on:22. d January, 2013 Date of Decision:28. h January, 2013 % Bhupender Pal Sharma Through ....Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishab Wadhwa and Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocates. Versus High Court of Delhi through Registrar General Respondent Through Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate with Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Aforementioned two writ petitions question the results of Delhi Judicial Services Mains Examination, 2012. Interviews for selection are to commence on 28th Januar...
Mumtaz Parveen Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :28. h January, 2013 % + CRL.REV.P. 367/2006 & Crl.M.A. No.5194/2006 MUMTAZ PARVEEN Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Seema Gulati, Adv. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Vijay Singh, PS I.P.Estate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of her appeal, vide which she challenged her conviction and sentenced awarded by learned MM in case FIR No. 582/1997, under Section 14 of Foreigners Act, PS I.P.Estate, this criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Mumtaz Parveen impugning the order convicting her for committing the offence punishable under Section 14 of Foreigners Act and sentence awarded to her thereunder.2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that she could not have been prosecuted and convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 14 of Foreigners Act till the question as to ...
M/S Onkar Plaster Decoration Works Vs. M/S Usha Foundation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: January 28, 2013 + Ex.P.No.34/2010 & E.A.No.246/2011 M/S ONKAR PLASTER DECORATION WORKS Represented by: None. ..... Decree Holder versus M/S USHA FOUNDATION Represented by: ..... Judgment Debtor None for JD. Mr.Virender Goswami, Adv. with Ms.Soni Singh, Adv. for objection, Ma Meenakshi Devi Trust. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present execution petition has been filed by the decree holder for attachment of assets and properties i.e. movable and immovable, belonging to the judgment debtor. List of movable and immovable properties of the judgment debtor is filed along with the execution petition which is available at page 43 of the petition.2. By order dated 20th August, 2010, warrants of attachment were issued qua property bearing not B-II/100, M.C.I.E., New Delhi, as judgment debtor refused to accept the service. Thereafter, Meenakshi Devi Trust filed E.A.No.246/2011 i.e. objections,...
Ravi Chandra Naik Vs. Samir Chawla and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: January 28, 2013 + OMP No.284/2012 RAVI CHANDRA NAIK Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Manoranjan Mishra, Adv. versus SAMIR CHAWLA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.Tanuj Khurana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner Ravi Chandra Naik filed the petition under Section 15(2) read with Section 12, 13 and 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of substitute arbitrator as the earlier sole arbitrator withdrew from his office. The prayer made in the petition is that substitute arbitrator be appointed in place of Mr.S.C. Chawla.2. Mr.Tanuj Khurana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has raised two points; first that there was no live issue left between the parties as controversy is ceased to exist in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and issuance of No Dues Letter issued by the petitioner to the respondent and second th...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »