Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Prakash Sharma Vs. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 634/2012 and CM 16351/2012 (stay) OM PRAKASH SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Beenashaw Soni, Adv. Versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD ... Respondent Through: Mr. Jagat Rana, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER 29 01.2013 % Late Sh. Hub Lal, the father of the appellant was a licensee of the respondent in respect of premises No. 68/1, Mori Gate, Delhi. Vide letter dated 12.07.1984, the respondent informed late Sh. Hub Lal that the premises occupied by him had been declared to be dangerous and it could fall at any time. He was asked to vacate the said property immediately. He was also informed that if he wanted to obtain alternative allotment of LPA 634/2012 page 1 of 7 residential/commercial/JJ plot, he should meet Tehsildar (Revenue and Rehabilitation), with all original certificates etc. Sh. Hub Lal died on 02.01.1985. However, his name continued to exist in the record of the res...
Hari Om Maheshwari Vs. Mahendra Kumar Sharda and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. REV. P. NO. 3/2010 Date of Decision:29. h January, 2013 + # ! HARI OM MAHESHWARI Through: Petitioner in person ....Petitioner Versus $ * MAHENDRA KUMAR SHARDA & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal & Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocates for R-1 Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner complainant under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(Cr. P.C.) against the order dated 29th September, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby respondent no. 1 was discharged after setting aside the order dated 7th June, 2008 of the learned Magistrate whereby the respondent no. 1 was ordered to be charged and tried for the offences punishable under Sections 420/468 IPC.2. The facts and submissions made before the learned Magistrate as noticed in the impugned judgment are as under:Complainan...
Noor Salam Vs. the State (Govt. Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :14. h January, 2013. DECIDED ON :29. h January, 2013. + CRL.A.694/2010 NOOR SALAM Through : ....Appellant Mr.R.M.Tufail, Advocate with Mr.Farooq Chaudhary & Mr.Vishal Raj, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Noor Salam impugns the judgment and order on sentence passed in Sessions Case No.1/2010 arising out of FIR No.326/2005 registered at PS Timarpur by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for eight years with fine ` 20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for six months.2. The police machinery came into motion on 01.07.2005, when Daily Diary (DD) No.78B was recorded at PS Timarpur at about 11.10 P.M. on getting information that a person had been shot at Nand Lal jhuggies, Mukherjee Nagar Police Picket and taken to Ar...
international Amusement Ltd. Vs. Entertainment Tax Officer and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\ % RESERVED ON:29. 11.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:29. 01.2013 + W.P.(C) 1259/1991 INTERNATIONAL AMUSEMENT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma and Sh. Rohan Sharma, Advocates. versus ENTERTAINMENT TAX OFFICER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Ms. Latika Chaudhry, Advocates. W.P.(C) 1394/1991 INTERNATIONAL AMUSEMENT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma and Sh. Rohan Sharma, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Ms. Latika Chaudhry, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR WP (C) 1259/91 & 1394/91 Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT Facts:1. The relevant facts of the case are that the Petitioner, a public limited company, (incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956) provides constructive and scientific entertainment which is als...
M/S Indersons Motors P. Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:29. 01.2013 % W.P.(C) 22886/2005 M/S INDERSONS MOTORS P. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Malhotra, Advocate Versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Balraj Dewan, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner establishment has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 13.01.2000 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as, the Act) as also the appellate order passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal) dated 18.08.2005 whereby the petitioners appeal under Section 7(I) of the Act against the order dated 13.01.2000 was dismissed.2. The case of the petitioner - which is a duly incorporated Private Limited Company, was that the petitio...
State Vs. Kumari MubIn Fatima and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :29. h January, 2013 % + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2012 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. versus KUMARI MUBIN FATIMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Sumeet Verma, Adv. for Gulbeg Ali. Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. for Zulfikar Ali. Mr. Ajay Verma with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Ms. Ananya Mitra and Mr. Gaurav Bhattacharya, Advs. for Mubin Fatima. + CRL.A. 474/2012 GULBEG ALI Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Sumeet Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.A. 472/2012 ZULFIKAR ALI ..... Appellant Through : Death Sent.Ref.2/2012 versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL.A. 473/2012 MUBIN FATIMA Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Ms. Ananya Mitra and Mr. Gaurav Bhattacharya, Advs. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way ...
Pragati Construction Co. Vs. Dda and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:29. 01.2013 + LPA 763/2003 .. Appellant PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. Through : Mr. N.K. Kantawala with Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Advocate Vs. .. Respondents D.D.A. & Anr. Through : Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. LPA 764/2003 . Appellant PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CO. Through : Mr. N.K. Kantawala with Mr. Amit P. Deshpande, Advocate Vs. UOI & Ors. .. Respondents Through : Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % The Appellant was successful in its bid at a public auction by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for plot No.6, Nehru Place, New Delhi. The Appellants bid was confirmed on 21-8-1980. LPA 763-64/2003 Pag2. One of the auction conditions related to payment of ground rent; its terms were that for the first two years, such rent was Re.1/- per annum and subsequently, it was to be at 2.5% of the premium amount. The Ap...
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-i) Vs. Jakson Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 01. 2013 ITA 48/2013 ITA 49/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-I) ... Appellant versus JAKSON LTD. ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) These appeals by the revenue arise out of the common order dated 22.06.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellant Tribunal in ITA No.4076/Del/2011 and 4073/Del/2011 pertaining to the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05.2. In both these matters the question is with regard to penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In respect of the assessment year 2003-04 the penalty imposed by the assessing officer was `15.4 lakhs whereas in respect of the assessment year 2004-05 the penalty amount was `9.30 lakhs. In both the cases the penalty was imposed because of t...
Dr. Smriti Goel Vs. Icici Bank
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
S.A. Siddiqui, J. Oral: 1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment/order dated 6.10.10 passed by the District Forum (East), Saini Enclave, Delhi in Complaint Case No. 954/09. Ld. District Forum through its impugned order dated 6.10.10 partly decreed the complaint. The complainant was not fully satisfied with the impugned order of District Forum and preferred this appeal. 2. Brief facts relating to this appeal are that the Complainant, Dr. Smriti Goel, is a holder of ICICI Bank credit card No. 4477463823908005. Reward points accrue to the card holder depending upon the amount spent through credit card. In December 2007, on the request of card holder and as per scheme of the OP, one Philips DVD player was dispatched to the holder by the OP charging Rs. 1200/- and adjusting 2983 reward points accumulated on the credit card. According to the complainant, each reward point was equivalent to Re 1/-. Thus OP charged Rs. 2983+Rs.1200/- = Rs. 4183 towards the cost of DVD player. The com...
Constable Brijbeer Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Its Chief S ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A): 1. The applicant has sought the following relief:- (1) To quash and set aside the impugned orders mentioned in Para-1 of O.A., direct the respondents to restore to the applicant his forfeited service and reduced pay with all consequential benefits including promotion/seniority and arrears of pay. (2) To award costs in favor of the applicant and (3) To pass any order or orders, which this Honble Tribunal may deem just and equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant is working as a Constable in Delhi Police. On 10.05.1998, the applicant witnessed that a Maruti Van which was driven in a rash and negligent manner struck Constable Rohtash Singh. He saw the accident and stopped the said Maruti Van and took the injured Constable to R.M.L. Hospital in the same Maruti Van. He also produced before SI Subhash one Sh. Charanjeet Singh, who was allegedly driving the vehicle involved in the accident. A case u/s ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »