Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Modern Food Industries (i) Ltd. Vs. Laljee Yadav and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
$~56. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:31. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 2615/2011 and C.M. No.5588/2011 MODERN FOOD INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Mr.Amit Kumar & Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocates. versus LALJEE YADAV AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Mishra & Mr.H.S. Sachdeva, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner management has preferred the present writ petition to assail the award dated 10.09.2010 passed by the Labour Court-XII, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.1499/04/99, whereby the Labour Court has answered the reference made to it by the Appropriate Government in favour of the respondent workmen and against the petitioner management. The following reference was made by the Appropriate Government on 03.11.2000 to the Labour Court: Whether the services of S/Sh. Krishna Kumar Laljee Y...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Oriental Structural Engineers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:31.01.2013 FAO(OS) NO.461/2012 and CM Appl. No. 16629/2012 (stay) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Appellant Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Meenakshi Sood and Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. versus ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. GAMMON INDIA LTD. (JV) Respondent Through: Mr.Anil Airi, Mr.Ravi Krishan, Ms.Sadhana Sharma, Mr. Hemant Majani and Mr.Pratyush Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) had entered into a contract with the National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) for the execution of work of four laning and strengthening the existing two lane highway from KM 180.00 to KM 240.00 on NH-2 in Bihar, Construction Package VA.2. Disputes arose between the parties which were referred to an Arbitral Tribunal who ...
Varinder Jeet Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1309/2009 and I.A. No.16391/2010 Date of Decision:31. t January, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF VARINDER JEET SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Advocate with Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit against the defendants/MCD under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of a sum of `28,34,441/-.2. The admitted facts of the case are that the plaintiff is a contractor and has been executing works of construction for the defendants/MCD for the past several years. In or around the year 2005, the defendants/MCD had invited tenders for improvement/widening of the parking space in Green Park Main Market in C-13/South Zone. In response to the said invitation, various parties, including the plaintiff herein, had submitted their tenders. At the time of subm...
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd Vs. Additional Commr. of Income Tax and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 552/2013 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL COMMR. OF INCOME TAX AND ANR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr S Ganesh, Sr. Adv. with Mr S Sukumar, Mr Anand Sukumar and Mr Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr Kamal Sawhney, sr. standing counsel with Mr Shashank Singh, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM 1043/2013 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 552/2013 & CM 1042/2013 (stay) This writ petition is directed against the order dated 11.01.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Stay No.310/Del/2012 in ITA No.6021/Del/2012 pertaining to the assessment year 2008-09.2. The petitioner sought stay of demand of `373.68 crores. The assessing officer acceded to the request of the asses...
Sunder Prasad Choudhary Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (C) No. 8506/2010 Judgment reserved on:31. t October, 2012 Judgment delivered on:31. t January, 2013 % SUNDER PRASAD CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. I. C. Mishra and Ms. Swati Chakraborty, Advocates. Versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Sweety Manchanda, CGSC for Respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr.Amrendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate for Respondent No.4/State of Jharkhand. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.08.2009, whereby the respondent No. 2 has come to the conclusion that the petitioner does not meet the eligibility criteria and evidentiary requirements of the Swantantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (for short SSS Pension Scheme). Consequently, rejected the application of the petitioner.2. Case of the petitioner is that he participated in the Quit India Movement, 1942 on the call of senior leaders like Gandhiji, Rajendra Babu...
Sumitomo Corporation India Private Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
Shamim Yahya, AM. 1. This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s. 143(3) read with section 144C of the I.T. Act for assessment year 2007-08. 2. The grounds raised read as under:- 1. That the learned Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 9(1), New Delhi has erred both on facts and, in law in determining income of the Appellant at Rs. 70,71,96314/- in an order of assessment dated 25.10.2011 framed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C of the Act as against the declared income of Rs. 15,39,50,749/-. 2. That the learned Additional Director of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer -11(2) New Delhi (Ld. TPO)/ Ld. AO have erred both in law and on facts in making an addition of Rs. 55,26,16,748/- on account of alleged understatement of arm's length price in respect of commission income earned by the Appellant from its Associated Enterprises ("hereinafter referred to as AE"). The aforesaid findings and conclusions have been reached without any ma...
Lt Col Rajindera Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
1. The petitioner has filed the petition in the Honble High Court of Delhi as WP(C) No.233/1993 and CM No.409/1993. After promulgation of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, the petition was transferred to this Tribunal as OA No.32/2009 on 17.08.2009. 2. The petitioner vide this petition has prayed for quashing of the order dated 29.11.1990 (Annexure-E) which awarded him Censure of Severe Displeasure (Recordable) and to aside the order dated 19.02.1992 (Annexure F) whereby the petitioners name was deleted from the names of officers selected for promotion to the rank of Colonel. He has further prayed that the petitioner should be promoted with the seniority w.e.f. March 1991 when others including some juniors were promoted based on the list of the selected candidates. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was commissioned into the Army Medical Corps on 22.11.1965. While serving in various appointments, he acquired additional qualification and in 1985 he was appointed as Reader i...
Vijay Singh Vs. M/S. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 1151/2012 VIJAY SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus M/S. HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS LTD. & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 1705/2012 VIJAY SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus M/S. HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS LTD. & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 1706/2012 VIJAY SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus + M/S. HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS LTD. & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CRL. M.C. 1707/2012 VIJAY SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus M/S. HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS LTD. & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of these Petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proce...
Mr. Ajay Sanghi Vs. Mrs. Madhur Bhargava and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 04.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 01.2013 + RFA 855/2003, C.M. APPL. 2099/2003, 2182/2003, 4688/2004, 13259/2006, 10056/2010 & 5670/2012 MS. ARATI BHARGAVA AND ANR. .Appellants Versus MRS. MADHUR BHARGAVA AND ORS. Respondents RFA 878/2003, C.M. APPL. 2144/2003 M/S. EKTA AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus MRS. MADHUR BHARGAVA AND ORS. RFA 912/2003, C.M. APPL. 2235/2003 MR. AJAY SANGHI Versus MRS. MADHUR BHARGAVA AND ORS. .Appellant Respondents .Appellant Respondents Appearance: Sh. Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Alok Kumar, Ms. Lata Krishnamurti, Sh. Karan Kalia, Sh. Ashish and Sh. Pranav Diesh, Advocates, for appellants in RFA 855/2003 and for respondents in RFA 732/2003, RFA 878/2003 & RFA 912/2003. Sh. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shraddha Bhargava and Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocates. Sh. Virender Goswami with Ms. Soni Singh and Sh. Sankalp Sharma, Advocates, for appellant in RFA 912/2003. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. ...
The Principal Delhi College of Arts and Commerce Vs. Mrs. Sunita Sharm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :30. 01.2013 + LPA 747/2004 THE PRINCIPAL DELHI COLLEGE OF ARTS & COMMERCE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.N. Goburdhan with Mr. Aayush, Advocates versus MRS. SUNITA SHARMA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The appellant questions a judgment and order of a learned single judge, of this Court, in which the respondents petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was allowed, as a result of which she was directed to be reinstated into service, with arrears of salary to the post of Junior Assistant (LDC).2. The brief facts are that the respondent was appointed to the post of Junior Assistant cum typist, on direct recruitment, pursuant to a public advertisement, in the Appellant-Colleges establishm...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »