Delhi Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.C.Vasudev Vs. Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3415/2010 % JANUARY, 24, 2012 R.C.VASUDEV Through: ...... Petitioner Mr. Piyush Sharma and Mr.K.G.Mishra, Advocate VERSUS PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By means of the present petition, the petitioner who was an employee of the respondent/Punjab National Bank seeks the relief of setting aside of the orders passed by the respondent-bank dated 10.12.2002 and 22.06.2009 in not treating the petitioner as a pension optee under the scheme for which the cut-off date was 30.10.1994.2. Before me, it could not be disputed on behalf of the respondent-bank that petitioner had in fact applied as a pension optee under the scheme of which cut-off date was 30.10.1994, inasmuch as, a specific letter dated 16.10.2002 to this effect was written by the concerned officer of the bank to the Chief Manager ...
Council for Advancement of Peoples Action and Rura Vs. Shri Ramesh Cha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
32. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:24. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 894/2007 and C.M. Nos. 1543/2007, 3985/2010 & 3986/2010 COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION & RURAL TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Prashant Singh, Ms.Prateti Rungta, Ms. Rashmi Jajonia & Mr. Jewan Chandra, Advocates. Versus SHRI RAMESH CHANDER Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Varun Prasad, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner management by this writ petition has assailed the industrial award dated 11.09.2006 made by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II (hereinafter referred to as CGIT), Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place, New Delhi in I.D. No.37/2003 arising out of the industrial disputes raised by the respondent workman, which were referred by the Appropriate Government for adjudication. The terms of reference read as follows:1. Whether the demand of the unio...
Babu Ram Aggarwal and anr. Vs. Krishan Kumar Bhatnagar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2013 % + CS(OS) 86/2009 BABU RAM AGGARWAL & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Ms. Swati Yadav for Mr. Sarabjit Sharma, Adv. versus KRISHAN KUMAR BHATNAGAR & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The two plaintiffs seek a decree for specific performance against the defendants No.2,3&4, by directing the defendant No.2 to execute the Sale Deed of 1/3rd share in respect of property bearing not C-23, Hauz Khas, New Delhi and by directing the defendants No.3&4 to execute the Sale Deeds of 1/6th share each, in favour of the plaintiffs.2. The case set out in the plaint is:(i). that Shri Shiv Prasad Bhatnagar father of the defendants No.1&2 and grandfather of defendants No.3&4 was the owner of property not C-23, Hauz Khas, New Delhi; (ii). that Shri Shiv Prasad Bhatnagar died on 14 th May, 1985 leaving a registered Will dated 19th January, 1978 whereunder the...
Shobha Devi and ors Vs. Bajaj Allianz Geneal Insurance Company Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d November, 2012 Pronounced on:24th January, 2013 + REVIEW PET. 262/2012 in MAC APP.580/2010 SHOBHA DEVI & ORS. Through: .... Petitioners Mr. S. Pandit, Adv. versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENEAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .... Respondent Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.CM APPL. /2012 (Exemption) (to be numbered) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The Application is allowed. CM APPL.7120/2012 (Delay) There is a delay of 2 days in filing the Petition. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay of 2 days in filing the Petition is condoned. The Application is allowed. REVIEW PET. 262/2012 in MAC APP.580/2010 1. The Petitioners (Respondents No.1 to 5 in the main Appeal) seek review of the judgment dated 22.02.2012 passed by this Court whereby Appeal filed by the Appellant Insurance Company (Respondent herein) was allowed holding that in case of gratuito...
P.D. Gupta and anr Vs. Ece Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 1443/2012 P.D. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Amrita Sharma, Adv. versus ECE INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Dilraj Kumar, Adv. CRL. M.C. 1444/2012 P.D. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Amrita Sharma, Adv. versus ECE INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dilraj Kumar, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of these two Petitions, the Petitioners who have been prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882 (the Act) invokes inherent powers of the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the complaint dated 23.06.2011 mainly on the premise that they had ceased to be Directors of M/s. Twilight Litaka Pharma Limited, who according to the Respondent was guilty of committing an offence under Section 138 of the Act and ...
Bhandari Engineers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maharaia-raj Jv and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:16. 01.2013 Judgment delivered on:24.01.2013 + FAO(OS) No.608/2011 BHANDARI ENGINEERS & BUILDERS PVT. LTD. .........Appellant Through: Mr.S.S.Jauhar, Advocate. Versus MAHARAIA-RAJ JV & ORS. ........Respondents Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Kumar and Ms.Meenakshi Sood, Advocate for R-4/NHAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 M/s MAHARIA-Raj-JV and another (hereinafter referred to as MRJV) was awarded a contract of six laning of the National Highway NH-1 from Km. 44.30 to Km 66.00 in the State of Haryana in terms of a contract dated 31.5.2001 entered into between National Highways Authority of India (NHAI- hereinafter referred to as the respondent no.4) and MRJV. 2 M/s Bhandari Engineering & Builders Pvt. Ltd. (BEBPL- hereinafter referred to as the appellant) was the sub-contractor of MRJV. This was in terms of the sub contract dated 27.05....
Shahid Balwa Vs. the Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2013 WP(C) 401/2013 & CM No. 802/2013 SHAHID BALWA ......PETITIONER Vs THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT + ....RESPONDENTS WP(C) 402/2013 & CM No. 804/2013 VINOD GOENKA ......PETITIONER Vs THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ....RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Ashish Dhingra and Mr. Hemant Chauhan, Advoctes For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Garg, Special Counsel with Mr.Sanjiv Aggarwal, AD (PMLA) CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.The aforementioned writ petitions lay challenge to a common order dated 03.01.2013 passed by the Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi (in short DOE). The impugned order has resulted in, the request made by the petitioners by way of a common application dated 12.12.2012, for cross examination of persons whose names and details are set out in para...
M/S Sukumar Chand JaIn Vs. Attam Vallabh Cooperative Group Housing
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:24. 01.2013 FAO (OS) 600/2009, CM APPL.1005/2013 M/S SUKUMAR CHAND JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocates. versus ATTAM VALLABH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) CM APPL.1005/2013 (for early hearing) In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the matter is taken up for final disposal today itself. FAO (OS) 600/2009 1. The respondent, despite repeated attempts, did not appear. This Court permitted service of notice by publication, and thereafter admitted the appeal on 9.2.2011. That day, the respondent was set down ex parte. FAO (OS) 600/2009 Pag2. The appellant had objected to an Award dated 17.02.2009 under Sections 30/33 (of the now repealed) the Arbitration Act, 1940. Though, its objections were uphel...
Rattan @ Ratan Singh Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:24. h January, 2013 + CRL.A. 605/2012 RATTAN @ RATAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State + CRL.A. 1239/2012 BILAL Through: ...... Appellant Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These Appeals are directed against the judgment dated 16.01.2012 and order on sentence dated 18.01.2012 whereby the Appellants were convicted under Section 20 (b) (ii) (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years each and to pay fine of `1,00,000/- each. In default of payment of fine, they were sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months each.2. ...
Sahib Singh Vs. Arvinder Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :22. 11.2012 Date of Decision :24. 01.2013 + FAO (OS) Nos. 444445 of 2012 SAHIB SINGH ... Through : ... Appellant Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. J.S. Bhasin, Ms. Rashmi Priya and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates. VERSUS ARVINDER KAUR & ORS. ... Through : Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advs. for R 1 to R 4.Mr. Jagbir Singh, Adv. for R 5.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The appellant filed a suit, being CS (OS) No. 2622/2008, for partition, mandatory injunction, declaration and rendition of accounts against the respondents. The appellant claimed that he was the son of late Sardar Amarjeet Singh. Respondent No. 1 is his natural mother, while respondent No. 2 is his brother and respondent No. 3 the sister. Late Amarjeet Singh is stated to have passed away on 23.03.2007 intestate leaving behind movable and immovable properties in which the appellant ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »