Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited vs Uber India Systems Private ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 345/2025 ROYAL CHALLENGERS SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha and Ms. Urvi Nama, AdvocatesversusUBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Ms. Anu Paarcha and Mr. Avijit Kumar, Advocates for D-1 & 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that the advertisement, which was assailed in the present suit, has run its course and therefore the suit itself has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such.2. In view of the aforesaid statement and having regard to the fact that learned counsel appearing for the defendants has no objection, the suit is disposed of as having become infructuous.3. The next date i.e. 08.04.2026, fixed before the Joint Registrar stands cancelled. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 AjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified ...
M/S Eagle Eye Security and Housekeeping Services vs Union of India & A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6875/2021, CM APPL. 21760/2021 and CM APPL. M/S EAGLE EYE SECURITY AND HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Savla, Senior Advocate with Mr.Prashant Parihar, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction hereby quashing/ setting aside the order dated 14.07.2021 of the Respondent for cancellation of the GeM contract and blacklisting of the Petitioner; b. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing/ setting aside the cancellation request dated 20.07.2021 of the Respondent for cancellation of the GeM contract and the demand that the Petitioner agency should...
M/S Cyber Media Research and Services Ltd vs Currimbhoy Mills Pvt Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 36/2025 M/S CYBER MEDIA RESEARCH AND SERVICES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv.versusCURRIMBHOY MILLS PVT LTD AND ANR......Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1986 (in short the Act) seeking to substitute the sole arbitrator.2. Mr. Ankit Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the notice in the present petition was issued by this Court vide order dated 11.09.2025.3. He submits that the respondents have been served with a notice sentthrough courier. In support of his contention, he invites attention of the Court to Annexure A-13 (pages 11-13 of the paper book), which shows the article sent to the addressee was delivered.4. In that view of the matter, the respondent is taken to have been served. Nonetheles...
Smt. Baljit Kaur vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 169/2021 SMT. BALJIT KAUR .....Appellant Through: Mr.Manish Kumar and Mr.Aviral S., AdvocatesversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 02.02.20261. The present appeal impugns the order dated 05.12.2020, where the appellants application under Orders XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of The Code of Civil Procedure,1908, came to be dismissed.2. This Court, vide order dated 11.08.2021, noting the fact situation,restrained the respondents from carrying out any further demolition and the appellant was further restrained from raising any construction in the subject property, till the next date of hearing. Subsequently, on CM APPL. No.order was sought, to the extent that respondent No.1 may be permitted tocomplete the demolition as well as to seal the subject property. However, during the course of the submissions, the prayer for f...
Yaksh Sharma vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7714/2025 YAKSH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sagar Kumar, SC for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:15:35...
Shahid Yousuf vs National Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(25)+ CRL.A. 608/2023(26) CRL.A. 609/2023 SHAHID YOUSUF SYED AHMAD SHAKEEL .....Appellants Through: Mr.Nitai Hinduja, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Mr.Akshai Malik, SPP (NIA) along with Mr.Khawar Saleem, Ms.Diptasree Bag, Advs. with Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, DSP (NIA)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for leave to withdraw the present appeals with liberty to avail of legal remedies as may be available to the appellant(s) in accordance with law.2. The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rv/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the...
Nargis Hoda Firdaus vs Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6376/2025 & CM APPL. 29120/2025, CM APPL. 29121/2025 NARGIS HODA FIRDAUS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Anand, Ms. Gunjan Bansal, Mr. Tarun Choudhary Advs.versusJAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Advocate Pritish Sabharwal, SCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:47:02...
Rajan Singh @ Abhishek vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2474/2025 RAJAN SINGH @ ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Puja B. Soni, Advocate/ DHCLSC)versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State Insp. Rajveer Singh/SHO, PS Vikas Puri and Insp. Sunny Kumar, ATO/Rajinder NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Applicant is stated to be in custody since 12.01.2016. Apparently, he has undergone incarceration for more than ten years.2. It is a dacoity, coupled with three murders.3. When the matter was taken up by this Court on 16.01.2026, a requestwas made to learned Trial Court to send a report whether the matter can be taken up on day-to-day basis and also to apprise the tentative period within which the matter in question can be disposed of.4. Report has been received in sealed cover from the learned Trial Courtand such report indicates that learned Trial Court has already recorded all witnesses, except three...
V3S Infratech Ltd and Ors. vs Anurag Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3864/2025 & CRL.M.A. 16882/2025 V3S INFRATECH LTD AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shafiq Khan & Ms. Anjani Suri, Advocates. [M:-9910000574]versusANURAG SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026 Mr. Shafiq Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, as it has been rendered infructuous. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid submission. PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 pv/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:00:39...
U.O.I & Ors vs Sanjay Kaushik & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71, 74 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3136/2006 & W.P.(C) 3137-3139/2006 KIRAT RAM & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4377/2007 & CM APPL. 8202/2007 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners SANJAY KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4668/2008 & CM APPL. 9007/2008 V.S.DAHIYA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, the Respondents who were working as LaboratoryAssistants have been granted revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000, with effect from 01.01.1996, as per recommendations of Vth Central Pay Commission and the Respondents have already demitted office after attaining the age of superannuation.2. They submit that while leaving the question of law open, the writ petitions may be disposed of as the Petitioners do not...