Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hraadyesh Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8397/2023&CRL.M.A. 3393/2026 HRAADYESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Jitendra.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Petitioner takes exception to order dated 16.12.2022 passed by concerned Magisterial Court which was upheld by the Court of Sessions on 14.07.2023.2. However, the petitioner has now moved application (CRL. M.A. 3393/2026) seeking withdrawal of his petition (CRL. M.C. 8397/2023).3. It is informed that on the basis of one Mediation Agreement dated 12.03.2025 between the parties, petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with his present petition and seeks to withdraw the petition.4. The copy of the Mediation Agreement has also been attached along with the application.5. In view of the above, while allowing the abovesaid application, the main petition stands disposed of...
Jeet Singh Through Lrs & Ors. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7706/2025 & CM APPL. 71708/2025 JEET SINGH THROUGH LRS & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Eitesh Dabas, Advocate.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for R1. Mr. Sonal Anand with Mr. Aayush Sai and Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advocates for R2. Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition was filed by Mr. Jeet Singh, who now hasexpired. The petition is being prosecuted by his legal heirs. It is the case of the petitioners that they are absolute and rightful owner of residential Khasra No.36/12/2, 13/2, 18 Gali No.19, B-Block situated at Village Mubarakpur Dabas also known as Dabas Hot/Metha Panni, Delhi.2. According to the petitioners, in absence of a proper approach road ofpublic gali extending till the boundary of the petitioners property, the premises is rendered useless and inacc...
Murari Kumar Singh vs Sunita Mitra
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 398/2024, CM APPL. 35496/2024 CM APPL. 46265/2024 MURARI KUMAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: None.versusSUNITA MITRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Sagar, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.02.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant.2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the Possession of the property has already been taken over.3. Appeal is dismissed in default of Prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/vaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:10:26...
Eastern International Hotels Limited vs Union of India Through the Sec ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8126/2025 & CM APPL. 35476/2025 EASTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Aakriti Vohra, Mr. Jappanpreet Hora, Ms. Megha Dugar, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Sr Adv. Along with Ms. Aadya Antya Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/P/KSRThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:48:24...
Radha Bansal vs Indian Bank
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11033/2024 RADHA BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailendra Ojha, Adv.versusINDIAN BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking cancellation of sale certificate issued by the respondent bank in favour of the petitioner under SARFAESI Act, 2002.2. The facts are that on 26.06.2018, the petitioner, being the highestbidder in public auction, purchased the property bearing No. G-2/3, Ground Floor, Block-G, Pocket-2, Sector-16, Rohini, New Delhi for an amount of Rs. 32.50 lakhs.3. The petitioner vide letter dated 27.06.2018 was informed by the thatone Ms. Santosh Kumari has challenged the auction proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the present auction would be subject to the decision of the pending proceedings. Thereafter, Ms. Kumari has approached ...
Karan Sagar vs Alka Bharti
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~5&6* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(5)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 304/2023 KARAN SAGAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs.versusALKA BHARTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. (6)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 14/2024 ALKA BHARTI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv.versusKARAN SAGAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the matter has been settled between the parties and have already moved the first motion before the Family Court. Hence, they pray to withdraw the present appeals.2. In view of the above, the present appeals along with pending applications, if any, stand disposed of as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/bs/smThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court ...
Shri Sumit Mehra and Ors vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16441/2022 SHRI SUMIT MEHRA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S. K. Rout, Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Ms. Alka, Mr. Rahul and Ms. Parmita, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sapna Chauhan; Advocate, Ms. Bhumi Jain; AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: i) direct the Respondent No. 1 to reconstruct the entire original file of property bearing no. 30/25, Shakti Nagar, Delhi -110007; ii) direct the Respondent No. 1 to supply the original sale deed executed by it in favour of late Shri Bhola Nath Mehra after its due reconstruction in a time bound manner.2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the owners of property bearing No. 30/25, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-110007.3. When the matter came up for hearing before this Court on 13.04.2...
Two Way Containers Line Private Limited vs Rinku Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1417/2022 TWO WAY CONTAINERS LINE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: None.versusRINKU DEVI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. No one has appeared on behalf of both the parties.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, the matter is passed over and be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/tp At 2:40 PM4. At this stage, no one has appeared on behalf of either of the parties.5. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Serv...
Sumeet Chadha & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13248/2025 & CM APPL. 54374/2025 SUMEET CHADHA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Taksh Suri, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Ms. Shilp Ohri, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Anuj Berry, Ms. Gauri Pasricha and Mr. Parimal Kashyap, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Deeksha L. Kakar, Mr. Rashneet Singh and Ms. Sana Parveen, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Ms. Purnima Jain, Mr. Swaraj Maurya and Mr. Ankit Jaiswal, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. Kshitij Chhabra, Advocate for R- 6 and R-7. Mr. M.K. Madan, Advocate for R-8 along with R-8. Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha and Mr. Hridyesh Kanna, Advocates for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 02.02.20261. A fresh status report has been filed on behalf of respondent/MCD in terms of the order passed by this Court on 18th November, 2025. W.P.(C) 13248/2025 Page 1 of 2 1.1 T...
Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Adv.Csr vs Bar Council of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10863/2025, CM APPL. 44834/2025 and CM APPL. MR. CHITRANJAN KUMAR ADV.CSR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Saini, AdvocateversusBAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Tanishq Shrivastava, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr. Vedant Sood, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Karan Batura, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a. Call the entire record of BCD /respondents w.r.t complaint no. 227 of 2024 filed under section 35 of Advocate Act for kind perusal and consideration of this Hon'ble court. b. Quash and set aside the impugned notice dated 21.09.2024, and oral reference order dated 18.07.2025 passed by BCD, and whatsapp intimation dt.19.07.25 in the interest of justice; c. Quash and set aside the entire further proceeding before the respondent no. 3 (DC-13) in pursuance of above...
- ‹ Prev
- 244
- 245
- 246
- 247
- 248
- 250
- 251
- 252
- 253
- 254
- Next ›
- Last »