Skip to content

Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 02 2026

Pravin Goyal & Ors. vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1042/2025 & CRL.M.A. 4789/2025 PRAVIN GOYAL & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anuradha Mittra, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCTOF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026Ms. Anuradha Mittra, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous, as the subject FIR has already been quashed. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid submission.PRATEEK JALAN, JFEBRUARY 2, 2026pv/KA/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:01:21...


Feb 02 2026

Pooja Sethi vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2999/2022 and CM APPL. 8657/2022POOJA SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kapur, Advocate.versusDELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr Anunaya Mehta,Mr Vidhan Malik and Ms Anandita Tayal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks liberty towithdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JFEBRUARY 2, 2026Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:16:39...


Feb 02 2026

Sumita Batra vs Amrik Singh

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 184/2023 SUMITA BATRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Amarjeet Singh Sahni, AdvocateversusAMRIK SINGH .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.04.2026CM APPL. 14779-14781/20261. Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks time to get the Certificatefrom the executing authority/SDM of the District where the Respondent was residing, that he has no other surviving legal heir.2. The Certificate be filed within 04 weeks.3. List on 31.08.2026.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.APRIL 27, 2026NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2026 at 13:17:39...


Feb 02 2026

Crompton Greaves Consumer Electrical Limited vs Orient Electric Limite ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 161/2025 & I.A. 4796/2025CROMPTON GREAVES CONSUMER ELECTRICAL LIMITED.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Hemant Daswani, Ms. Saumya Bajpai, Advocates.versusORIENT ELECTRIC LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Angad Singh Dugal, Mr. Govind Singh Grawal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 02.02.20261. The parties submits that under the aegis of the Delhi High CourtMediation and Conciliation Centre, the inter se disputes have been resolved and such terms of settlement have been recording in writing vide Settlement Agreement dated 22.12.2025.2. This Court notes that the terms of settlement commence from para (i) ofpara 3 of the Settlement Agreement through till para (xv).3. This Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds no impedimentin decreeing the Suit in terms thereof.4. The Settlement Agreement alongwith annexures appended thereto aretaken on record. Parties shall ...


Feb 02 2026

Meena Bazar Street Vendors Hawkers Sangathan and Ors vs Municipal Corp ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2775/2025MEENA BAZAR STREET VENDORS HAWKERS SANGATHANAND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sushant Pal and Mohd. Asif, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Mishra, CGSC with Mr. Navneet Dubey, Adv. for UOI Ms. Puja S. Kalra, SC with Mr. Virendra Singh, Adv. for MCDCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioners in this case are Tasleem Khan, Radhey Shyam Gupta,Jamal Khan and Deepak Gupta who have filed the petition through Mr. Haider Ali, President of the Petitioner No. 1 Association - Meena Bazar Street Vendors Hawkers Sangathan & Ors. (hereinafter the Association).3. Firstly, considering the nature of the matter, the Association could nothave been made a party as the petition has not been filed on behalf of the Association or all of its members, but only in respect of t...


Feb 02 2026

Manpreet and Anr vs Richmondd Global School and Ors

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

$~15, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 256/2024 & CM APPL. 8826-8827/2024 SUMINA GUPTA .....PetitionerMR. RISHABH GUPTA AND ORS .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 5371/2022, CM APPL. 16076/2022, CM APPL. 19092/2022,CM APPL. 3072/2024 & CM APPL. 9024/2024MANPREET AND ANR .....PetitionersRICHMONDD GLOBAL SCHOOL AND ORS .....Respondents+ CONT.CAS(C) 1585/2024 & CM APPL. 58557/2024 SUMINA GUPTA .....PetitionerMS.NIDHI GUPTA AND ORS .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 02.02.2026W.P.(C) 5371/20221. This petition was instituted at a time when the Petitioner was in theemployment of the Respondent School, seeking directions for disbursement of her arrears of salary along with interest. Apprehending that she may be removed from service without due process of law, the Petitioner also sought a protective direction restraining the Respondents from taking any such action.2. Additionally, the Petitioner also sou...


Feb 02 2026

Mohita Gogia vs Rajat Gogia

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

$~52&53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 RAJAT GOGIA .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 SURENDER KUMAR GOGIA & ANR. .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3465/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 CRL.M.A. 3459/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3302/20231. Both the petitions are connected petitions and, therefore, they havebeen taken up together.2. The next date in both the abovesaid petitions is 09.04.2026 but sincethe parties have amicably settled all their disputes, the petitioners have filed separate applications seeking early hearing.3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the abovesaid applicationsare allowed and the dates are pre-poned and, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the matters have been taken up today.4. Mr. Valecha, learned counsel for respondents in both the abovesaidCRL.M.C. 3277/2023 & CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 1matters has joined the proceedings through ...


Feb 02 2026

Mohita Gogia vs Surender Kumar Gogia & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

$~52&53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 RAJAT GOGIA .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 SURENDER KUMAR GOGIA & ANR. .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3465/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 CRL.M.A. 3459/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3302/20231. Both the petitions are connected petitions and, therefore, they havebeen taken up together.2. The next date in both the abovesaid petitions is 09.04.2026 but sincethe parties have amicably settled all their disputes, the petitioners have filed separate applications seeking early hearing.3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the abovesaid applicationsare allowed and the dates are pre-poned and, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the matters have been taken up today.4. Mr. Valecha, learned counsel for respondents in both the abovesaidCRL.M.C. 3277/2023 & CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 1matters has joined the proceedings through ...


Feb 02 2026

Khalid Khan vs Narcotics Control Bureau

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1502/2025 & CRL.M.A. 3453/2026 KHALID KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Nemo.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at this stage seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application.2. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.3. The next date of hearing i.e., 09.02.2026 stands cancelled.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:17:31...


Feb 02 2026

Armaan International vs Assistant Commissioner, Cgst & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4778/2025 ARMAAN INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Senior Standing Counsel.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 02.02.20261. Since the alternate remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner, we relegate the petitioner to take recourse to such appellate remedy.2. As such, the petition stands disposed of.3. The time spent in prosecuting the present petition shall be considered in the matter of reckoning the issue of limitation.4. Needless to clarify, this Court has not appreciated the merits of the matter.5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/ab/ssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial