Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi Kant Attri and Ors vs Registrar of Societies and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1378/2026 RAVI KANT ATTRI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sangeeta Singh, Advocate.versusREGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND ORS .....RespondentsThrough: Mr.Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocate for R-BOB.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:- a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby directing Respondent No. 1 (Registrar of Societies, GNCTD) to ensure the immediate conduct of free, fair, and transparent elections of the Managing Committee of Shri Sanatan Dharma Radha Krishna Mandir Sabha (Regd.), in accordance with the registered Bye- laws and the Societies Registration Act, 1860. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby directing Respondent No. 1 (Registrar of Societies, GNCTD) directing the last duly elected Managing Committee of the mandir ...
Shri Ashok Arora vs Shri Rajender Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 245/2026, CM APPL. 6685/2026 &CM APPL. 6686/2026 SHRI ASHOK ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh, Advocate.versusSHRI RAJENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law. 3. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order i...
Mohd Asim & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 340/2026 MOHD ASIM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva Advocate along with SI Kriti Singh. R-2 with her counselCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3304/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 340/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 282/2024, registered at Police Station Welcome, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Welcome, Delhi.This is...
Mohammed Noshad vs Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1375/2026 MOHAMMED NOSHAD .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Amit Kumar Attri and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocates. versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Arya Suresh Nair, Ms. Shreya Lamba, Mr. Dhananjay Gautam, and Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 02.02.20261. Prima facie, we are of the view that the petition suffers from delay and latches as the prayer pertains to unconditional release of 349.80 grams of seized gold, which was seized vide receipt no.41304, dated 12th November, 2025. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a motion for withdrawal of the petition as he intends to take recourse to such other remedies as is permissible and available in law. 3. That being so, the petition stands disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.This is a di...
Swinder Pal Singh & Anr. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 852/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3365-3366/2026 SWINDER PAL SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Narang, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Das, Ms. Ayshwarya Chhabra and Ms. Nishat Nafisa Ahmed, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Divya, PS Model Town. Dr. Ashutosh and Mr. Dalip Singh, Advocates for R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 02.02.2026After some arguments, Mr. Pawan Narang, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners in CRL.REV. P. 34/2026 [Hardeep Singh & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.]. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submission.PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 pv/KA/This is a digitally signed ...
Meena Devi vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 846/2026 MEENA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv DHCLSC.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Khushbu Singh.CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3351/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 846/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks the following relief: a) pass appropriate orders directing the Investigating Officer of FIR No. 142/24, PS: Laxmi Nagar, Delhi to file the Report U/s. 173 Cr.P.C. without any further delay and direct the Ld. Trial Court to expeditiously proceed with the trial;4. The learned APP for the State, on instructions from the main Investigating Officer (I.O.), submits that the charge sheet in this case will be filed within one week from date, under intimati...
Jyoti vs Telugu Primary School & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1373/2026 JYOTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Ms. Kritika Matta, Ms. Tanya Rose & Ms. Shreya Gupta, Advocates. versusTELUGU PRIMARY SCHOOL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hanu Bhasker, Advocate for R-1, 2 & 4. Mr. Anand Prakash, SC, MCD with Ms. Varsha Arya & Mr. Satbeer, Advocates for R-3.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The Petitioner is working as an Assistant/Primary Teacher in Telugu Primary School (Respondent No. 1). Her grievance pertains to the denial of the first financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP). The said request was rejected by the Respondent vide the impugned communication dated 30th October, 2023. A perusal of the impugned communication shows that it has been issued on the letterhead of Andhra Educational Society, Telugu Middle School (Linguistic Minority Sc...
Jang Bahadur Yadav vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 432/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3313/2026 JANG BAHADUR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Mr. Shivani Sharma and Mr. Raghav Chawla, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Narender KumarCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 127/2025 of PS Crime Branch for offence under section 20/25/29 NDPS and section 345(3) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution side, 254.10kg ganja was recovered from the truck of the accused/applicant on the basis of secret information, followed by a raid. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant presses for bail on three grounds. Firstly, it is contended that the grounds of arrest were not furnished to the accused/applicant in the language which he understands. Secondly, it is contended that no independent wi...
Singla Trading Co. Through IT Proprietor Mr. Hari Dass Singla vs Commi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1398/2026 & CM APPL. 6868/2026 & CM APPL. 6869/2026 SINGLA TRADING CO. THROUGH IT PROPRIETOR MR. HARI DASS SINGLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Parveen Kumar Gambhir and Mr. Naveen, Advs. versusCOMMISSONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr. Suraj Shekhar Singh and Mr. Harsh Singhal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 02.02.2026 On instructions, prayer for withdrawal of the petition is made as the petitioner has an alternate remedy. As such, the writ petition, along with pending applications, if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to seek recourse through the alternate remedy available.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/gs/avThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be r...
Moti Lal and Anr. vs Sanjeev Khirwar, Commissioner, Municipal Corporat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 186/2026 MOTI LAL AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shashank Rai, Ms. Shreya Shankar, Mr. Himalaya Sharma, Mr. Saikat Gangopadhyay, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Ms. Manisha and Mr. R.K. Seewal, Advs.versusSANJEEV KHIRWAR, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Beenashaw N Soni, Standing Counsel, MCD with Ms. Ann Joseph, Adv.CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This hearing has been through hybrid mode. 2. The present contempt petition has been filed by the Petitioners under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging contempt against the Respondents for non- compliance of order dated 18th December, 2025. 3. Vide order dated 18th December, 2025 the Court had directed as under: [...]5. It is the contention of counsel for petitioners that,This is a digitally sig...
- ‹ Prev
- 239
- 240
- 241
- 242
- 243
- 245
- 246
- 247
- 248
- 249
- Next ›
- Last »