Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uoi & Ors. vs V.S.Dahiya & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71, 74 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3136/2006 & W.P.(C) 3137-3139/2006 KIRAT RAM & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4377/2007 & CM APPL. 8202/2007 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners SANJAY KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4668/2008 & CM APPL. 9007/2008 V.S.DAHIYA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, the Respondents who were working as LaboratoryAssistants have been granted revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000, with effect from 01.01.1996, as per recommendations of Vth Central Pay Commission and the Respondents have already demitted office after attaining the age of superannuation.2. They submit that while leaving the question of law open, the writ petitions may be disposed of as the Petitioners do not...
Joydeep Sinha vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4752/2025 JOYDEEP SINHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate (VC)versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State alongwith SI Abhishek, P.s.-EOWCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3506/2026 (withdrawal)1. The applicant has filed the present application seeking withdrawal of the captioned bail application, being BAIL APPLN. 4752/2025.2. Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that an application for regular bail has been filed before the learned Magistrates Court, and that the applicant intends to pursue the said application.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present application is allowed and stands disposed of. Accordingly, the captioned bail application, alongwith any pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the application pending ...
Smt Anshu Grover vs Indian Bank & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 605/2026 SMT ANSHU GROVER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Kumar Thakur, Advocate.VersusINDIAN BANK & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Mr. Niraj Kumar & Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 02.02.20261. The Petitioner had earlier filed W.P.(C) 17718/2024, wherein the following prayers were sought:(a) quash the notice/order dated 15.5.2015 issued by the Assistant GeneralManager (HRM), Indian Bank forfeiting the gratuity amount under Section 4(6) (b) (ii) and 4(6)(a) of the Payment of Gratuity Act payable to the deceased employee -Yashpal Grover;(b) issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring interest @ 16 % per annum with effect from March, 2014 onwards of her c) pass such other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit2. The aforesaid writ petition was disposed of by order dated 23 rd December, 2024, whereby this Court...
Suresh Babu vs Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 2nd February, 2026 Uploaded on: 4th February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 18845/2025 SURESH BABU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madunesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC for NDMC with Mr Soumit Ganguli, Ms. Ravicha Sharma, Ms.Shruti Agarwal, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 78439/2025 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 18845/2025 & CM APPL. 78438/20253. The present petition is one of multiple petitions filed by the Petitionerfor the same relief in respect of the vending site located at Opposite to Shop No. 129, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi-110023. It is the petitioners claim that he has been squatting there since 1989.4. The Petitioners case in respect of the same vending site...
Longlasst Inc vs Toshi Automatic System Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 41/2026, CM APPL. 3422/2026 & CM APPL. LONGLASST INC .....APPELLANT Through: Ms. Komal, Adv.versusTOSHI AUTOMATIC SYSTEM PVT. LTD.....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Gaurav Puri, Mr. Sarthak Gupta and Mr. Kushagra Bali, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 02.02.20261. The appeal in hand is directed against the order dated 22.07.2025passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court No. 3, District- West, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Commercial Court) whereby the suit filed by the appellant was rejected on the ground that the appellant- plaintiff was not registered under the provisions of The Partnership Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1932).2. While rejecting the plaint, the Trial Court has observed that the appellant is not registered and therefore the embargo of Section 69 of the Act of 1932 will operate and the suit filed by the petitioner was...
Sonu vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 310/2026 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate (Through VC)versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for State SI Vikas, PS Kalyan PuriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No. 792/2023dated 05.09.2023, registered at Police Station Kalyan Puri, under Sections 307/341/34 of IPC. Subsequently, in the charge-sheet, Section 174-A of IPC was added.2. Bail is, primarily, being sought on the ground of parity as two other similarly situated accused have already been enlarged on bail.3. When asked, learned counsel for applicant, in all fairness, admitted that the applicant never moved any application before the learned Court of Sessions, seeking release on the ground of parity.4. After hearing some arguments, he seeks to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file appropriate application be...
Gaurav Jaiswal vs the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4794/2025 GAURAV JAISWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. C.S. Dahiya, Mr. Ravinder Khatri, Mr. Akash Pratap Singh, Mr. Saurav Pandey & Mr. Lalit Mohan, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Shruti Saini, PS Karol Bagh Ms. Rubiya Sultana, Advocate for prosecutrix.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 02.02.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 1140/2025 of Police Station Karol Bagh for the offence under Section 69/79 of BNS.2. In furtherance of last order, today learned prosecutor and learnedcounsel for prosecutrix have referred to some more documents forming part of the chargesheet according to which the accused/applicant allegedly registered multiple accounts at the same matrimonial site and one of those accounts was allegedly registered by him naming himself as a girl. This according to the prosecution...
Lakshay Jain vs Registrar / District Magistrate South West District De ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18751/2025 LAKSHAY JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusREGISTRAR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SOUTH WEST DISTRICT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocate, GNCTD, Panel Counsel (Civil).CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 13.03.2026 CM APPL. 15545/2026 (for direction)1. The petitioner seeks direction to comply with the order dated 02.02.2026 passed by this Court. If, according to the petitioner, there is non-compliance of the said direction, the remedy would lie elsewhere.2. With these observations and with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate recourse, the application stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 13, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:22:52...
Sukhjeet Kaur vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18919/2025 and CM APPL. 78768/2025 SUKHJEET KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tribhuvan, Mr. Chandan, Mr. Manoj Kumar AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Anubhav Gupta, (panel Counsel GNCTD) Mr Kartik Sharma Advocates for R-2. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioner by way of complaint dated 01.09.2025 appears to have approached the District Magistrate under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS, 2023) highlighting the public nuisance.2. The complaint which has been brought on record as Annexure-P-11does not bear the signature of the petitioner. Though, the petitioner submits that it was signed and sent to the authority, but in absence of any concrete proof, the same position cannot be accepted.3. In view of the aforesaid, let the petitioner to file a proper complai...
Abhishek Gupta @ Abhishek Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4811/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 2455/2025 & CRL.M. (BAIL) 21/2026 ABHISHEK GUPTA @ ABHISHEK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit S. Pujari and Mr. Bhavesh Seth, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. With Mr. Divyang Kishwan, Advocate. SI Sachin.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at this stage seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application, without prejudice to his rights and contentions.2. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/lpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:17:14...