Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shantnu Tyagi & Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1367/2026 SHANTNU TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kuldeep Jauhari, Mr Anubhav Tyagi, Mr Sahil , Mr Bharat Gautam, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms Prabhsahay Kaur, SC, Adv Ms. Antara Mishra, Adv Ms. Anmol M.Kaur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- A. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents to act upon the complaint dated 18.07.2025 filed by the Petitioner; B. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No.2 to initiate and/or conduct vigilance inquiry proceedings in relation to the allegations made in the complaint dated 18.07.2025 and complete the inquiry proceedings in a time bound manner; 2. Mr. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner, ...
Nafis Ahmed vs Superintendent of Central Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1455/2026 NAFIS AHMED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalitendra Gulani, Mr. Mohit Pugalia, Mr. Tanuj Kumar Takkar, Ms. Gayatri Srivastava, Advs.versusSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shubham Tyagi SSC, CBIC with Ms. Navruti Ojha, Mr. Rishabh Chauhan, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 17.02.2026CM APPL. 10918/2026 (fresh by petr. for clarification of order dt. 02.02.2026) 1. The present writ was disposed vide order dated 02nd February 2026. 2. The petitioner has sought clarification of the same as according to him, though, the appeal is preferred against the tax liability, the interest and the penalty, he has already discharged the tax liability. 3. In such an eventuality, drawing support from the Sub-clause (b) of Sub-section 6 of Section 107 and proviso thereto, it is the contention of the counsel for t...
Janak Kumar Navinchandra Solanki vs the State of Nct Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 437/2026 JANAK KUMAR NAVINCHANDRA SOLANKI .....Petitioner Through: None.versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 03.02.20261. The present case is taken up on office notice. 2. It is pointed out by the Registry that in para no. 12 of the order dated 02.02.2026, while granting anticipatory bail to the applicant, it has been inadvertently mentioned that the bail application stands dismissed. In fact, the bail application was allowed. 3. Accordingly, para no. 12 of the order dated 02.02.2026 shall now read as under: 12. The bail application is disposed of. 4. No further orders are required to be passed. 5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 03, 2026/AThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi...
Brij Mohan Mahajan & Anr. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 197/2026 BRIJ MOHAN MAHAJAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhinav Mukherji, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Gehlot, Mr. Manoranjan Naik, Ms. Archita Nigam, Ms. Khushboo Hora and Mr. Sanat Garg, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate for GNCTD.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Although the Petitioners have alleged contempt of the order dated 21st January, 2019 passed by this Court, Mr. Abhinav Mukherji, Senior Counsel for the Petitioners, fairly states that there is no violation of the said order. He submits that the grievance of the Petitioners arises on account of discrepancies in the Aks Shajra, in respect of which a representation dated 28th July, 2025 (Annexure P-6) has been submitted by the Petitioners. 2. In view of the above, Mr. Mukherji seeks permis...
Westend Green Farms Society vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 191/2026 WESTEND GREEN FARMS SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Gehlot, Mr. T.S. Thakran, Ms. Manju Gehlot, Mr. Daksha Dhiman and Mr. Ankit, Advocates.versusSOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate for MCD. Mr. G.S. Oberoi and Mr. Ankur Sharm, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Pulak Gupta Joshi and Ms. Shambhavi Vatsa, Advocates for DJB.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 02.02.20261. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience and violation of the orders passed by this Court on 15th October, 2025 and 4th December, 2025 in W.P.(C) 5372/2022. 2. In terms of the aforesaid orders, the respondent no.2/Delhi Jal Board was directed to supply water tankers to the petitioner society. 3. Issue Notice. 4. Notice is accepted by counsel appearing on behalf the respondents.CONT.CAS(C) 191/2026 Page ...
Naim vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 433/2026 NAIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Quereshi, Advocate versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State SI Khagnesh, PS Seelam Pur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3334/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 433/2026 1. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 397/2025 dated 23.12.2025, registered at Police Station Seelampur for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 307/34 IPC). 2. The prime grievance of the applicant is to the effect that when the similar relief was prayed by him by filing an application before the learned Court of Sessions, learned Court of Sessions, vide order dated 19.01.2026, permitted him to join the investigation and investigating officer was also directed to issue...
Jagdeep Dalal vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 362/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3482/2026 JAGDEEP DALAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ravindra Dabas & Ms.Kirti Sharma, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Adv. along with Insp. Parmod Kumar, PS Begumpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, and with liberty to take remedies as may be available to the petitioner in law, prays for leave to withdraw the present petition. 2. The petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.NAVIN CHAWLA, JRAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rv/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High C...
City Convent School & Anr. vs Council for the Indian School Certificat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2109/2022 & CM APPL. 6067/2022CITY CONVENT SCHOOL & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Anukul Raj, Mrs. Nikita Raj, Mr.Tushar Bhalla, Mr. Naveen, Mr. Vishal Yadav,Mr. Manjeet Goswami, Advs.versusCOUNCIL FOR THE INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATEEXAMINATIONS.....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, Ms. Megha Sharma, Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh, Ms. Surabhi Tuli Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking setting aside of the order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the respondent.2. The brief facts are that one Mr. Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay executed aTrust Deed dated 30.08.1999 in the name and style of National Education Foundation trust (NEF).3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay incorporated another family privatetrust in the name of NIIT JEE, i.e. petitioner No. 2, vide Trust Deed dated 04.07.2008.4. An amendment was carried ou...
Shri Bhagwan Projects Pvt Ltd vs C S Construction Co Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 208/2026 SHRI BHAGWAN PROJECTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S N Pandey AdvocateversusC S CONSTRUCTION CO PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 02.02.20261. The present Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes between the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to take such steps, as may be available to the Petitioner in accordance with law, including filing of a Suit. 3. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted. 4. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with the pending applications, if any. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026 RahulThis is a digital...
Nipa Jain (Prop. of M.S Tijil Interiors) vs Sunil Dutt Pokhriyal & Anr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 215/2026 NIPA JAIN (PROP. OF M.S TIJIL INTERIORS) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kumar and Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocates. versusSUNIL DUTT POKHRIYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Nemo.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes inter se the parties in terms of the Agreement dated 08.04.2024 as executed between the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner on instructions, states that he would like to withdraw the present petition to take such steps as are available to him under law. 3. Liberty, as sought for, is granted. 4. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN...
- ‹ Prev
- 238
- 239
- 240
- 241
- 242
- 244
- 245
- 246
- 247
- 248
- Next ›
- Last »