Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Nithyakalyani Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 21.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report within the period specified by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 21.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 21.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.12 of 2016 on 17.04.2016 for offences under Sections 498(A), 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this...
M. Santhana Krishnan and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madur ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents not to harass these petitioners and their family members in the guise of enquiry in connection with the case in which petitioners' brother was arrayed as accused on the file of the control of the juridication of 1st and 2nd respondent police officials limit and issue direction to the respondents to take necessary action based on the representation sent by the petitioners on 21.3.2016.) 1. These petitions have been filed to direct the respondents not to harass these petitioners and their family members in the guise of enquiry in connection with the case in which petitioners' brother was arrayed as accused on the file of the control of the jurisdication of 1st and 2nd respondent police officials limit and issue direction to the respondents to take necessary action based on the representation sent by the petitioners on 21.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners...
Amalan Mosess Vs. The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi District, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the investigastion in connection with Crime No.13 of 2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sayarpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District to be withdrawn and transferred to any other agency more particularly to the Deputy Superintendent of police, CBCID, Thoothukudi Range, Thoothukudi District forthwith.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the investigation in connection with Crime No.13 of 2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sayarpuram Police Station, Thoothukudi District to be withdrawn and transferred to any other agency more particularly to the Deputy Superintendent of police, CBCID, Thoothukudi Range, Thoothukudi District forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.13 of 2010 has been completed and action was dropped as early as 28.12.2012. A copy of the ...
M. Perumal Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, Erode
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence made in S.C.No.179 of 2010 dated 08.03.2013 by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode District at Bhavani.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.179 of 2010 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode District at Bhavani. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of I.P.C. By judgment dated 08.03.2013, the trial court convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 of I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months for the offence under Section 201 of IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant/sole accused is before this Cour...
Tiruchitrambalam Projects Ltd. Vs. Customs, Excise and Service Tax App ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Misc. Order No.41984 of 2014 dated 18.11.2014, quash the same and direct the first respondent to examine the prima facie merits of the case in the stay application.) 1. This writ petition arises out of an order passed by the Tribunal, directing the petitioner to make a predeposit of Rs.2 crores, as a condition for entertaining the appeal and for grant of stay. 2. Heard Mr.Joseph Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Mahadevan, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel for the second respondent. 3. This writ petition actually went before a learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge reserved orders on 18.1.2016, after being confronted with a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Metal Weld Electrodes Vs. CESTAT, Chennai [(2014) 299 E.L.T. 3 (Mad.)], to the effect that the o...
United India Insurance Company Limited, Rep by its Branch Manager, Siv ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgment and decree dated 16.11.2010 and made in MCOP.No.40 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Pattukottai.) 1. When the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is taken up for hearing on 21.04.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs....
P. Sathya Vs. Kaviarasu
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: The Transfer CMP is filed under Section 24 of CPC to withdraw the HMOP.No.159 0f 2015 on the file of the Sub Court, Perambalur and transfer the same to the file of Sub Court, Karur.) 1. The Transfer CMP is filed to withdraw HMOP.No.159 0f 2015 on the file of the Sub Court, Perambalur and transfer the same to the file of Sub Court, Karur. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that an ex parte decree was passed in HMOP.No.159 of 2015 on 07.04.2016. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Transfer CMP. Hence, the Transfer CMP is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed....
Sadaiyandi Vs. The District Superintendent of Police, Karur and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case for alleged offences punishable u/s.427 294(b) 506(i) of IPC on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 25.3.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case for alleged offences punishable u/s.427 294(b) 506(i) of IPC on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 25.3.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 25.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 02.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known...
D. Settu and Another Vs. The Divisional Executive Magistrate/Revenue D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Revision filed under Sections 401 and 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the impugned lock and seal order in Na.Ka.A6/7890/2015 dated 21/3/2016 on the file of the first respondent and set aside the same.) 1. The Petitioners have filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition, as against the impugned order, in Reference No.Na.Ka.A6/ 7890/2015, dated 21/3/2016 (pertaining to the Lock and Seal Order), passed by the First Respondent/Divisional Executive Magistrate/ Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet Division, Ranipet, Vellore District. 2. The First Respondent/Divisional Executive Magistrate/ Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet Division, Ranipet, Vellore District, while passing the impugned order, dated 21/3/2016, at paragraph No.5, had observed that the subject matter of property, based on the request of the Village Public was personally inspected and at the time of inspection, in two poultry forms, there were no hens/chicks and it remained em...
Oyyammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to register the complaint based on the representation dated 23.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to register the complaint based on the representation dated 23.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 23.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 14.04.2016. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. The respondent police is directed to send a copy of the Closure Report to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »