Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Dhanalakshmi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 18.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 25.03.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
Murugan Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Lakshmi.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Lakshmi. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
M. Saravanan Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endo ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS to issue a direction directing the respondents 1 to 8 to take appropriate action against the respondents 9 and 10 for illegally parting with Karuppucode Shenbaga Kuthan Kandan Sastha Temples property as well as excommunicating the families including the petitioner's family members from social gathering with the villagers of the Karuppucode village and further ensure the petitioner and other family members right to worship Karuppucode Shenbaga Kuthan Kandan Sastha Temples based on his representation dated 05.03.2016.) 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Jinnah Mohamed, the Sub-inspector of Police attached to the Eraniel Station is present before this Court. As per the instructions, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the police complaint given by the petitioner was enquired into and in that enquiry, the respondents 9 and 10 were also present....
Sathya Vs. State represented by its the Inspector of Police, Tiruppur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the order of conviction and sentence passed on her by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in S.C.No.292 of 2011 dated 25.04.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.292 of 2011 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur. She stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 392 I.P.C. By judgment dated 25.04.2013, the trial Court convicted the accused for offence under both the charges and sentenced her to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months, for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months, for the offence under Section 392 I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused/appellant is before this Court ...
Official Assignee, High Court, Madras Vs. T.R. Bhuvaneswari and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. These three appeals arise out of a common order passed by the learned Judge sitting in the Insolvency Jurisdiction on three applications taken out by the learned Official Assignee. 2. Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the Official Assignee, Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent and Mr.M.Swaminathan, learned Standing Counsel for the third respondent. 3. A lady by name T.R.Bhuvaneswari, who was a partner in a firm that owned a cinema theatre, was adjudged as an insolvent and her share in the partnership firm and in the properties were brought to sale by the learned Official Assignee. Out of the sale proceeds, the Official Assignee set apart one portion representing capital gains tax. 4. Thereafter, the Official Assignee came up with three applications in A.Nos.28, 29 and 32 of 2015 before the Insolvency Court. The prayer in A. No.28 of 2015 was to direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) to waive the interest ...
Ammaiyappan @ Babu Vs. R.S. Ganageswari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: This Transfer CMP is filed under Section 24 of CPC praying to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.161 of 2014 pending on the file of Sub Court, Srivilliputur and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Srivilliputur, to be tried along with HMOP.No.6 of 2014 on the file of Family Court, Srivilliputur. ) 1. The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw and transfer the case in HMOP.No.161 of 2014 pending on the file of Sub Court, Srivilliputur to Family Court, Srivilliputur, to be tried along with HMOP.No.6 of 2014. 2. The petitioner herein is the husband and the respondent is the wife. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 07.03.2011. Due to the dispute, both are living separately. Originally, the respondent filed HMOP.No.40 of 2012, before the Principal Sub Court, Kovilpatti, for restitution of Conjugal rights. The petitioner filed HMOP.No.40 of 2012, on the file of Sub Court, Srivilliputur, for divorce. The petitioner filed ...
S. Panchavarnam Vs. The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to secure the accused in Cr.No.90 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police in the nature and circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to secure the accused in Cr.No.90 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police in the nature and circumstances of the case. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that on the complaint given by the petitioner, the respondent police have registered an FIR in Crime No.190 of 2016 on 09.02.2016 for offences under Sections 294(B), 406, 420 and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act. While so, the petitioner has filed the present petition to arrest the accused. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, such a direction cannot be issued, inasmuch as it is the discretion of the Investigating Officer either ...
V. Ananda Perumal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the complaint dated 09.03.2016 preferred by a petitioner and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the complaint dated 09.03.2016 preferred by a petitioner and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 09.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 09.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with l...
N. Jeyaseelan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.01.2016 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR on the petitioner's complaint dated 02.01.2016 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 02.01.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 02.01.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the a...
M. Manoj @ Manojkumar Vs. State Represented by the Sub-Inspector of Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in pertaining to the case in Crime No.413 of 2016 pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same to the petitioner alone.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in pertaining to the case in Crime No.413 of 2016 pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.413 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 325 and 506(ii) IPC, has been registered against the petitioner/A4. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the petitioner/A4 and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent police, namely, S.Thilakar, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Koodal Puthur Police Sta...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »