Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesan. S Vs The Joint Director of Collegiate Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2025CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, O/o. Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. 2.The Secretary, Ramasamy Tamil College, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.S.Naganathan, Principal-Incharge, Ramasamy Tamil College, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner as Principal- Incharge of Ramasamy Tamil College forthwith in the light of theorder passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.11709/Aa3/2022 dated 30.01.2023 as well as the representation made by the petitioner dated 07.02.2023. (Prayer amended vide order dated 20.06.2023 in WMP.(MD)No. 12244 of 2023 in WP.(MD)No.6705 of 2023) For Petitioner : Mr.A.Karthik For R1 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Ad...
Daniel Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTORDER RESERVED ON :25.06.2026ORDER PRONOUNCED ON : 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP(MD).No. 12643 of 2026 and Crl.MP(MD).Nos.12427 & 12428 of 2026 Daniel ....Petitioner/Accused No.11 Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Inspector of Police Thuckalay Police Station Kanyakumari District Crime No.628 of 2020 ....1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Satheesh ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer:The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023, to call for the records in connection with C.C.No.32 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate at Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District subsequently quash the same as devoid of merits and illegal forthwith.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Lakshmana Abish For Respondents :Mr.P.Samuel Gunasing Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by Accused No.11 in C.C.No.32 of 2023 on the...
P. Alaguraja, Vs M. Jeyalakshmi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CMP(MD)No.6880 of 2026 in CMA.(MD)SR.No.43760 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.AND R.POORNIMA, J This petition is filed to condone the delay of 561 days in filing the above appeal.2. Learned counsel for therespondent would submit that the petitioner has come up with the proposal of settlement and he has no objection in the delay being condoned and the appeal being numbered.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, delay is condoned and this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise inorder.(A.D.J.C, J.) (R.P, J) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis bala 30.06.2026...
M.Pushpa Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Additional Chief Secre ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA HCP(MD)No. 810 of 2026 M.Pushpa Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondents: Mr.G.Karuppasamu Pandiyan, Counsel for State of Tamilnadu(Crl.Side)Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order passed in H.S.(M) Confdl.No.63/2025 dated 01.07.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu or body of the detenu namely, the petitioner's son i.e., Gokulakrishnan, aged about 20 years S/o. Manikandan, now detained at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith.ORDER(Order of the Court was...
Pradhap Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Karur Town
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CRL MP(MD) NO. 11516 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL MP(MD) NO. 11516 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD) NO.596 of 2026 Pradhap Petitioner Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police, Karur Town Police Station Karur Crime No.300/2023 Respondent For Petitioner: Mr. Dr.R.Alagumani For Respondent: Mr.D.Raja Boopathy Government Advocate(Crl.Side) Prayer: C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner while granting bail to him in Crl.MP(MD )No. 7116/2026 in Crl.RC(MD) No. 596/2026 dt. 02.04.2026 and pass such further or other orders.ORDERThe condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.MP(MD )No. 7116/2026 in Crl.RC(MD) No. 596/2026 dated 02.04.2026 is modified as the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on 1st working working day of every month.2. This petition is ordered. 30-06-2026 Sml https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vinoth @ Vinoth Kannan vs the State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superint ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Vinoth @ Vinoth Kannan ... Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police,3. The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.92/2017)4. Mathavan ... RespondentsCriminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to relax the condition imposed in Crl.A.(MD)No.564 of 2026 on 13.05.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mathava Selvam For R1 to R3 : Mrs.V.Moushica, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.A.(MD)No.564 of 2026 dated 13.05.2026, in and by which, the petitioner was directed to appear before the learned II Additional Sessions Judge (PCR), Tirunelveli, on all working days at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Polic...
Thanalakshmi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Sub Inspector Of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Thanalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 48 of 2025).2. Niranjana Devi... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records of the pertaining to be impugned charge sheet under C.C.No. 715 of 2025 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Theni and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Ms.Dharshini for Mr.Nithinkaanth J I For Respondents : Mr.Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the petitioner/5th accused in CC No.715 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Theni seeking to quash the charge sheet, wherein, the petitioner is charged with the offences punishable under Sections 85, 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women ...
Ganesan vs Rengasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
inThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 214 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Though the respondents have been served and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 214 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition is condoned.skn 2/2 inThe learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the fourth respondent, viz., Errammal, died on 22.07.2007 and that her legal representatives are already on record as respondents 10 to 14. 2.The said memo is recorded. The respondents 10 to 14 are recorded as the legal representatives of the deceased fourth respondent, Errammal.skn 1/2 Note : Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title....
Lenin Paul Singh Vs Jenisha Sharon Sha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CMP(MD) No.8041 of 2026 in C.R.P(MD).No.SR83766 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR.J I am satisfied with the reason given in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 2.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise inorder and list the matter 'for admission' in theusual course. 30.06.2026 Rmk 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Hasina Begum Vs Nandhi Associates
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CRL MP(MD) NO. 12593 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL MP(MD) NO. 12593 of 2026 in CRL RC(MD) NO.1099 of 2025 Hasina Begum Petitioner Vs Nandhi Associates Rep by its partner M.Suresh Respondent For Petitioner: M/s.C.Arulvadivel Associates Mr.O.R.Gokul Abimanyu Prayer: C-60. To relax the iii condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.(MD) No.11046 of 2025 dated 21.08.2025 in Crl.RC(MD) No.1099/2025 pending on the file of this Honble Court and thus render justice.ORDERThe 3rd condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.M.P.(MD) No.11046 of 2025 in Crl.RC(MD) No.1099/2025 dated 21.08.2025 is relaxed.2. This petition is ordered. 30-06-2026 Sml https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »