Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Managing Director, Vs Nagajothi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P.(MD).No.4061 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD) SR.No.110888 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.andK.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 262 days in filing the above appeal. 2.Heard both sides.3. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. [N.A.V., J.] [K.K.R.K., J,] 25.06.2026 Indu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Maheswari Vs R.Banupriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14660 of 2026 in A.S.SR.No.158307 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 132 days in representing the above First Appeal, is ordered. 24.06.2026 kmm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Manager Vs Valli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.10431 of 2026 in CMA SR No.200928 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.951 of 2018 on the file of the MACT Additional District Judge, FTC, Kancheepuram. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. But there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Ramaswami Vs P.Kanakavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.8370 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.45216 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.K.Vinod, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the third respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on respondents 1, 2 and 4 and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 288 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://w...
The State Of Tamil Nadu Vs Mangai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.7820 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.10908 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 122 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Branch Manager Vs Thiloshma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.14977 of 2026 in CMA SR No.25325 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) Dispensed with for the present. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) 24.06.2026 sli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
E.Sunil Reddy Vs The Directorate Of Enforcement
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & WPMP Crl.No.255 of 2026 E.Sunil Reddy S/o. Late. Ella Reddy Flat No. G2, Block No. 8 Hill Ridge Springs, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Directorate Of Enforcement Represented by its Additional Director, Office of the Additional Director2. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Office of the Deputy Director3. The Union of India - Rep. by its Principal Secretary 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building Sansad Marg, New Delhi- 110 001. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent provisional attachment order no.21/2025 (CEZO-I) dt. 23.12.2025 bearing F.No. ECIR/CEZO-I/30/2020 and quash the same and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Kripakaran For Respond...
The Branch Manager Vs B.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14716 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.59106 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Mnagement Vs K Shanmugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.10904 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.29647 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 113 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Hemanathan @ Vicky Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
Crl.M.P.No.10424 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.24910 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered. 24.06.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. pvs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »