Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saranraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Saranraj ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By, the Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 220 of 2026). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Velmurugan For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 220 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police...ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (P D B J) 25.06.2026 PNM TO1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL,J PNMORDERIN CRL OP(MD) No.12366 of 2026...
S.K.Pandian Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR S.K.Pandian ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 2.K.Neelamegam 3.K.Arumugam 4.P.Soundharapandiyan ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st Respondent to conduct enquiry and pass orders on the petitioners statutory application dated 08.06.2026 under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the 2nd to 4th Respondents within the time that maybe stipulated by this Court.For Petitioner :Mr.V.M.Ashiv For R1 :Mr.F.Deepak *****HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.cmrORDERThe learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Permission is granted. 2.Recording the endorsement made...
N.Elangovan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and WMP(MD)Nos.13341 and 13343 of 2026 N.Elangovan ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home (Courts VIA, department), Secretariat, Chennai.2. The District Collector, Madurai. ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the ROC.No.C4/e4593516/2026 dt.05.06.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent, and quash the same to the extent of appointment for the post of Special Public Prosecutor 1 and 2, in the Special Court in the cadre of District Judge, Madurai, dealing with the cases of offences in contravention of provision of MMDR, Act 1957, shown as serial no.14 and 15 therein as it is arbitrary and illegal and to direct the 2nd respondent to consider petitioner'...
J.Mohamed Haris Vs The Superintendent of prison
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.Crl.(MD) No.3520 of 2026 J.Mohamed Haris ...... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison Trichy 620 020. 2.The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police 3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur Police Station Thanjavur District. ...... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide proceedings in No.127624/Thaku.4/2026 dated 11.06.2026 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to grant 3 days emergency leave without police escort to the petitioner's father namely Jahaber Sathik, S/o.Haja Allavudeen, Life Convict, PID No.321781confined at Central Prison, Trichy for attending th...
The Divisional Manager, Vs K.Suresh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.13443 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.65776 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 69 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.400 of 2021 dated 31.01.2025 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / IV Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai.2. Despite receipt of notice, the respondents 3 and 4 failed to enter into appearance.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.4. Considering the reasons assignedand taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list it for admission in the usualcourse. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Santhosh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.19724 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.29034 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 9 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2024 dated 29.11.2024 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Principal District Court, Karur.2. Despite receipt of notice, the second respondent failed to enter into appearance.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent.4. Considering the reasons assignedand taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list it for admission in the usualcourse. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Chellammal Vs Logapriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.19463 of 2025 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.97804 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.116 of 2022 dated 04.07.2025 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional District Court, Virudhunagar.2. Despite receipt of notice, the first respondent failed to enter into appearance.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.4. Considering the reasons assignedand taking note of the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list it for admission in the usualcourse. 25.06.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation Vs Minor. Rithika
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.1018 of 2026 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.107726 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 18.06.2026, the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) and they have filed a Memo dated 23.06.2026 to that effect and also produced the challan. The above said Memo is recorded.2. In view of the above, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and list it for admission in the usualcourse. 25.06.2026 csm 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mathiyalagan Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
CRL MP(MD) NO. 20103 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL MP(MD) NO. 20103 of 2025 in CRL RC(MD) SR NO.84190 of 2025 Mathiyalagan Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police Nachiyarkovil Police Station In Crime No.724/2023 Thanjavur District. Respondent For Petitioner: Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondent: Mr.S.Arun Arockiasamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Prayer: C-60.To Condone the Delay of 266 days in filing the Criminal Revision Petition against theorder passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kumbakonam in Crl MP No.07/2025dated 18.12.2024 and thus render justice.ORDERBeing satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. 25-06-2026 Sml https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Nagajothi Vs The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2706 of 2025 Nagajothi ....Petitioner Vs3. Surya.....Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner to enable her to enter the rented premises situated at the first floor of the 3rd respondent's house at 4/78, Indira Nagar Colony, Katchaikatti, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District, remove her household articles, clothes, jewels, documents and other belongings and vacate thepremises, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 11.12.2025, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mohandoss For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.C.Susikumar Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »