Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Devan Industries vs M/S.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.19662 and 19663 of 2024 Devan Industries Rep. by its Proprietor G.Ganaprakash Devakumar, No.15, Thonakulam Village, Devaiyam Pakkam Panchayat, Wallajabad Ullavoor PO, Kancheepuram 631606, Tamil Nadu Also at Door No.5, Plot No.19 3rd Cross Street, Rajeswari Nagar, Extension, Selaiyur, (Also called as Dhanalakshmi Street) Petitioner Vs 1.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., 11th Floor, North Side R-Tech Park, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai 400063. Branch Office at 6th Floor at Khivraj Complex 11, 477-482, Anna Salai, Chennai 600035 Rep. by its Chief Manager, Satheeshkumar P. 2.J.Jayaseelan - Mortgagor/Guarantor Door No.5, Plot No.19, Extension Selaiyur 3.Ida Jaseelan - Mortgagor/Guarantor, Door No.5 Plot No.19, Extension, Selaiyur RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 2...
T.Sathish Kumar Vs Alhaj. S.M.Mohamed Yousuf and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA T.Sathish Kumar S/o. KG. Thangavelu, No.19/85, Vanniyar 2nd Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai 600 094. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Alhaj. S.M.Mohamed Yousuf The Chairman,2. Dr. Ranee Vedamuthu Chennai - 603 103 ..Respondent(s)Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court order dated on 22.10.2025 in W.P.No.39263 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Perumal For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Jagadeesan for M/s.K.V.Subramanian Associates Page1 of 4ORDERBoth the learned counsels submit that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.39263 of 2025, dated 22.10.2025, has been complied with.2. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsels, this contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No dsn Page2 of 4 To1. The Chairm...
S. Santhosh Vs Somasundaram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.M.P.No.7241 of 2026 S. Santhosh ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Somasundram2. The State Rep.by,The Inspector of Police, Cr.No.44 of 2024. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, pleased to call for the records relating in C.M.P.No.2086 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore and set aside the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.I Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Nivendran for K.Prabhakaran for R1 Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Criminal side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 30.03.2026 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore, in C.M.P.No.2086 of 2026. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the petitioner was produced for remand on 20.02.2024, the Court rejected the remand vide its Page1 of 4order dated 20.02.2...
Minor V.Subha Vs Muthu Sanmugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND SA SR NO. 204019 OF 20251. Minor V.Subha Rep. by her Guardian and Mother Krishnaveni, D.No.2/82-1, Moongilthozhuvu, Udumalpet Taluk, Tiruppur district. Appellant(s) Vs1. Muthu SanmugamS/o.Late Nachimuthu Gounder, 2.Sellathal W/o.Sivasamy, Chettikaattuthottam, Eragampatti, Ponnivadi Village, Dharapuram Tk, Tiruppur Dist. 3.Ramadurai 4.Vijayakumar Kattiyakaattuthottam, Eragampatti, Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 102 days in representing the Second Appeal in SA.SR.No. 204019/2025. For Appellant(s): Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For Respondent(s):ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 102 days in representing the Second Appeal in SA.SR.No.2. The reason assigned by the petitioner for delay is justifiable. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. pbl Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citati...
Thyagarajan P. vs Dr.P.Manorama
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-22-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in Thyagarajan P. S/o.Mr.M.S.Pinagapani, No.2/726,4th Cross, Second St, Kazura Garden,Neelankarai, Chennai 15. ..Applicant(s) Vs1. Dr.P.Manorama Kodambakkam, Chennai M.S. Pinagapani (DECEASED) Kodambakkam, Chennai-24 (Plaintiff and the first defendant are already as the legal heirs of the deceased second defendant as per order dt-5.4.22 in CS.777/2018). ..Respondent(s) To Direct the Defendant to remain physically present before the court for the purpose of the Cross-Examination. For Applicant(s): No appearance. For Respondent(s): Mrs.P.Uma.ORDERThis application has been filed to Direct the Defendant to remain physically present before the court for the purpose of the Cross-Examination. 2.There is no representation for the learned counsel for the applicant. 3.Learned counsel for the respondent/defendant is present and submits that earlier, an application in A. No. 3715 of 2024 has...
Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu vs N. Ismail
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM ..Applicant(s) Vs N. Ismail 17 Poonamallee High Road Chennai 3 ..Respondent(s) To direct the respondent to quit and deliver vacant possession of the property at No.17 Poonamallee high road, Chennai 3 For Applicant(s): Ms.S.Sumathi AG&OT For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThe present application has been filed to direct the respondent to quit and deliver the vacant possession of the property at No.17, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai -3.2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the subject property wasacquired for Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) project and in pursuance to the order of the Honble Supreme Court, the compensation has been granted. Page1 of 3 Since the land has already been acquired, the relief sought for in the present application to quit and delivery possession does not arise at all. Thus, this application stands closed. No costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaki...
Mahendra Babu Vs Mr. AIG SUDAROLI,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Mahendra Babu ..Petitioner(s) Vs Mr. AIG SUDAROLI, ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of theorder of the Court dated 09.05.2025 in W.P.No.17409 of 2025.For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Harikrishnan For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Veeramani Government PleaderORDERMr.R.Veeramani, learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated 09.05.2025, the respondent has passed an order in R.C.No.6077/D2/2025 dated 17.02.2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner counsel does not dispute the same. Page1 of 2G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.2. In view of the orders having been complied with, no further orders are required. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: ...
Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu vs M/S. Bata India Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM ..Applicant(s) Vs M/s. Bata India Limited Bata Shoe Shore Chennai 14 ..Respondent(s) To direct the respondent to quit and deliver vacant possession in respect of a portion at premises No.5, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai 3. For Applicant(s): Ms.S.Sumathi, AG&OT Mr.Dheeraj Kumar Co-trustee For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThe present application has been filed to direct the respondent to quit and deliver the vacant possession of the property at No.5, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai -3.2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the subject property wasacquired for Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) project and in pursuance to the order of the Honble Supreme Court, the compensation has been granted. Since the land has already been acquired, the relief sought for in the present Page1 of 3 application to quit and delivery possession does not arise at all. Thus, this appl...
Mrs. R. Kalavathi and 3 others Vs C. Kandasamy Trust
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM1. Mrs.R.Kalavathi2. Mrs.Usha3. Mrs.Chitra4. Mrs.Akila Nandakumar Applicants -vs- C.Kandasamy Trust Represented by The Administrative General and Official Trustee, Family Court Buildings, 1st Floor, High Court, Chennai 600 104. Respondent Prayer: To Direct the Respondent to provide the documents with regard to the title deed of the Trust respondent to the land admeasuring to an extent of 0.99 cents, comprised in S.NO.87/2 of Aynambakkam Village to the Applicants. For Applicants: Mr.R.Govindaraj For Respondent: Ms.S.Sumathi AG&OT*****ORDERThe present application has been instituted to direct the respondent to provide documents with regard to the title deed of the Trust respect to the land admeasuring to an extent of 0.99 cents, comprised in S.No.87/2 of Ayanambakkam Village.2. Learned counsel for the applicant would mainly contendthat respondent has no document to establish tha...
N. Ismail vs the Administrator General
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM N. Ismail 17 Poonamallee High Road Chennai 3 ..Applicant(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) To permit the petitioner to deposit the rent in respect of the above said premises at NO.17 poonamallee High Road, Chennai 600 003 For Applicant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Ms.S.Sumathi AG & OT Mr.Dheeraj Kumar N Co-trusteeORDERIn view of the acquisition of the subject property by the Government for developing the Chennai Metro Rail Limited Project, the relief sought for in the application has lost its relevance and the application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No RKA Page1 of 2S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.RKA To Page2 of 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »