Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Rajan vs the Executive Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.13708 of 2017 & 18337 of 2018 P.Rajan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Executive Officer, Kanyakumari Town Panchayat, 2.The General Manager, Hotel Tamil Nadu, 3.The Regional Manager (Madurai), Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent herein in Letter No. 200/X.j/f.F/2016 dated 01.09.2017 and quash the same and further direct the respondents herein not to interfere with my right to establish and run 19 shops (temporary structures) in Survey No.599/1 to an extent of 4629 square feet, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari Village, Kanyakumari District as per the license granted by the second respondent herein in Letter No.832/H3/2016 dated 20.10.2016 and subsequent agreements dated 18.01.2017 for ...
G.Kandasamy Vs Dr. Krishnasamy Rajivan, IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR in W.P.(MD)No.2568 of 2024 G.Kandasamy ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. 1.Dr.Krishnasamy Rajivan I.A.S., The Commissioner of Treasury and Accounts/ 3rd Floor, Perasiriyar K.Anbazhagan Maaligai, Nandanam, Annasalai, Chennai 600 035. 2.S.R.Murralitharan, The District Treasury Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.Shri.Bhupesh Sushil Rahul, The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office VI, 5th Floor, PLA Rathina Towers, 212, Annasalai, Chennai 600 006. ... Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts act, 1971 to punish the Contemnors/ respondents for their wilful, deliberate, disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.2568 of 2024, dated 07.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Venkatesan For R-1 & R-2 : Mrs.K.Porkodi Government Pleader For R-3 : Mr.A.Shajahan Standing Counsel ...
J.Melanshia Selvakumari Vs State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 20.02.2026Pronounced on : 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.28082, 28083, 28321, 28323, 28325, 28326, 28327 to 28331, 28333 to 28335, 28339 and 28340 of 2025J.Melanshia Selvakumari ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35389 of 2025 R.Indumathi ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35725 of 2025 M.Valontina ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35726 of 2025 K.Vijayalakshmi .... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35727 of 2025 T.Jeeva .... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35728 of 2025 M.Musaber Kani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35729 of 2025 A.Jesintha Fatima Mary ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35730 of 2025 P.Thillai Kani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.35731 of 2025versus1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Director of Medical Education and Research, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.3. The Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai. ......
The Managing Director Vs Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
C.M.P(MD)No.1393 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)SR No.106401 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court in C.M.P(MD)No.1393 of 2026, dated 18.06.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.2,500/-and filed a copy of the cost memo to that effect.2. The said memo is recorded and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list the matter in the usualcourse. 29.06.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Vinay Kumar Vs Indira
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.This petition has been filed under Section 25 of Guardian & Wards Act, 1890, r/w Order 21 Rule 2 & 3 of Original Side Rules seeking for appointment of the petitioner as the legal guardian of his minor daughter V.Viyona, having born out of his wedlock with Isaivani.2. The minor child who was born on 05.02.2017. On 17.12.2019, thepetitioner's wife Isaivani committed suicide by hanging herself and died three days later at Kilpauk Medical Hospital, Chennai -10. Ever since the death of Isaivani, the minor child V.Viyona is in the custody of the respondent, who is the petitioner's mother in law. In such circumstances, this petition has been filed seeking for permanent custody of the minor child V.Viyona.3. Notice has been duly served on the respondent in O.P.No.290 of 2021 and despite service of notice, the respondent has not entered appearance till date or engaged any counsel to represent her interest.4. This Court, by way of abundant caution, also direct...
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Harigovind
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.9651 of 2026 in WA SR No.4718 of 20261. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Non-Corporate, Circle 3(1), Chennai 34. and another2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2(3) Chennai, 1st Floor Investigation Building, 46, MG Road, Chennai 34. Appellant(s) Vs1. Harigovind S/o.Shri Anandkumar Rengaswamy, 19 New No.45, Venues Colony, 2nd St, Alwarpet, Chennai 18. Respondent(s)For Appellant(s): Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Addl. Solicitor General of India Assisted by Mr. A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel The Honble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the applicants.2. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 15.07.2026, on payment...
A.Maheswari Vs R.Banupriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14660 of 2026 in A.S.SR.No.158307 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 132 days in representing the above First Appeal, is ordered. 24.06.2026 kmm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Manager Vs Valli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.10431 of 2026 in CMA SR No.200928 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.951 of 2018 on the file of the MACT Additional District Judge, FTC, Kancheepuram. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. But there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Ramaswami Vs P.Kanakavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.8370 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.45216 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.K.Vinod, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the third respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on respondents 1, 2 and 4 and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 288 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://w...
The State Of Tamil Nadu Vs Mangai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.7820 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.10908 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 122 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »