Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Baskar Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
Crl.MP.No.10501 of 2026 in Crl.OP.SR.No.25761 of 2026G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed praying to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the Final Report dated 26.05.2025 filed by the 1st respondent in Spl.C.C.No.3 of 2025 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge at Karaikal.2. Heard both sides.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. 24.06.2026 ah Note: Registry is directed to number the connected criminal original petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.P.Kumaraguruparan Vs The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
Crl.M.P.No.10497 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.24095 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered. 24.06.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. pvs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vignesh Jeevanandhan Vs Parthiban Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in Vignesh Jeevanadhan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Parthiban Ramakrishnan2. Gokulakrishnan Ramakrishnan3. The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Cr.No.103 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS., to permit the Intervenor to intervene in the anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.10691 of 2026. For Petitioner(s): D.Ferdinand for M/s.BFS Legal For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel for Mr.Yatheesh Chandra Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition is filed to permit the petitioner to intervene in Crl.O.P.No.10691 of 2026. Page1 of 2 inC.KUMARAPPAN, J.kv2. Heard the learned counsel for the intervening petition and the respondents.3. This petition is ordered as prayed for. 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No kv To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Public Prosecutor, High Cou...
C.Nandagopal Vs M.Revathy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.14386 of 2026 in AS SR No.77297 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 89 days in filing the above appeal. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and the learned counsel had entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. 3.The suit had been filed seeking partition and separate possession. Since the suit is forpartition, it would only be appropriate the issuesare examined again by the First Appellate Court.4.Taking that factor into consideration, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the appeal for admission. Registry may also print the name of the counsel for the respondents in the cause list when the appeal is posted for admission. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/S.Paams Fuels, vs the Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WMP No.21859 of 2024 M/s.PAAMS FUELS, Rep. By its Proprietor, Mr.P.Srinivasan, PAN No.AIWPG3405F, No.9, Ramakrishna Nagar, Pudhupalayam Main Road, Appakudal, Erode 635 315. .. Petitioner -vs-2. K.Valarmathi .. RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration to declare the sale contested by the 1st respondent bank in petitioners property of the petrol bunk to the 2nd respondent from the pending case S.A.No.102 of 2021 before DRT, Coimbatore, as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jayachandran For Respondents : Mr.S.Pandurangan for R-1 *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and the petition has become infructu...
The Official Liquidator, vs M/S Maxowrth Orchards India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY IN1. The Official Liquidator,High Court of Madras, As provisional Liquidator of M/s.Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd, (in Provisional Liquidation) No.29,Rajaji Salai, Corporate Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Chennai -2. D.Nagasaila, Administrator of M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd. New No.14/1, Old No.38/1, Akbarabad 2nd Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600024 ..applicant(s) Vs M/s Maxowrth Orchards India Karumuthu Centre, 7th floor, No.498 Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600035 ..Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Ms.Ambil, B. Deputy Official Liquidator Ms.D.Nagasaila, Administrator Page1 of 2 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. kalORDERThe Official Liquidator seeks to withdraw this application with permission to re-file with the correct particulars. Granting such leave, this application is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. 24-06-2026 KAL IN Page2 of 2...
Carboline India Pvt Ltd vs Union Roadways Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP NOs. 2385 and 2450 OF 2025Carboline India Pvt Ltd., Rep by its Authorized Representative T.J. Logammal Vs Union Roadway Ltd., Rep by its Area Manager, V. Kabeer Road, Gee Gee Shroff Centre, Chennai 084. Carboline India Pvt Ltd Rep.by its Authorized Representative, T.J.Logammal Vs Union Roadways Ltd Rep.by its Area Manager, V.Kabeer Road, Gee Gee Shroff Centre, Chennai 84. To set aside the Fair Order and Decree dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai in IA No.7/2024 in IANo.5/2023 in COS No.1081/2022 on the file of the learned Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai. To set aside the Fair Order and Decree dated 24.3.2025 passed by the Learned Additional Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai in IA.No.5/2023 in COS.No. Chennai and to allow the Petition in IA.No.5/2023 in COS.No. 1081/2022. For Petitioner in both Mr.Thomas T Jacob cases: F...
T.Pachiyammal vs the Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN1. T.Pachiyammal2. C.Tirupathi .. Petitioners-vs- Erode 638 001. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to receive the balance outstanding amount by virtue of the resolved order passed in Case No.1238 of 2023 through Lok Adalath organized by District Legal Services Authority, Coimbatore vide settlement memo dated 14.10.2023 and consequently not to take any coercive steps till the disposal of the O.A.No.878 of 2021 on the file of the learned DRT, Coimbatore, within stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Ms.L.Sharu Angelin for Mr.M.Natarajan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constituti...
E.Badrinath vs the Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WMP No.21644 of 20241. V.Badrinath2. V.Rajagopal .. Petitioners -vs-2. Mohamed Agia.M .. RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration to declare the sale held by the 1 st respondent in favour of the 2nd respondent on 09.05.2024 in Sale Notice dated 12.04.2024 is illegal and consequently direct the 1 st respondent to receive the balance amount payable under OTS with delayed period interest. For Petitioner : Ms.K.JayagangaORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is settled between the parties and therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. An endorsement is also made to that effect. In view of the above, this writ petition is dism...
Madeswaran Vs Rajamanickam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14369 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.88078 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 76 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 76 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »