Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Branch Manager Vs Thiloshma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.14977 of 2026 in CMA SR No.25325 of 2026C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) Dispensed with for the present. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) 24.06.2026 sli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
E.Sunil Reddy Vs The Directorate Of Enforcement
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & WPMP Crl.No.255 of 2026 E.Sunil Reddy S/o. Late. Ella Reddy Flat No. G2, Block No. 8 Hill Ridge Springs, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Directorate Of Enforcement Represented by its Additional Director, Office of the Additional Director2. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Office of the Deputy Director3. The Union of India - Rep. by its Principal Secretary 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building Sansad Marg, New Delhi- 110 001. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent provisional attachment order no.21/2025 (CEZO-I) dt. 23.12.2025 bearing F.No. ECIR/CEZO-I/30/2020 and quash the same and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Kripakaran For Respond...
The Branch Manager Vs B.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14716 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.59106 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 296 days in re- presenting the appeal is condoned. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, in order and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Mnagement Vs K Shanmugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.10904 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.29647 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 113 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The DGM (T) And Project Director Vs The District Collector And Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.No.14848 of 2026 in Arb Appeal No.SR214134 of 2025P.VELMURUGAN, J.andK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [PVJ] [KGTJ] 23.06.2026 cgi Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S. Ramachandran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and C.M.P.No.26702 of 2023 1.S.Ramachandran 2.S.Arumugam ...Appellants Vs. Kanchipuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to allow the above Writ Appeal by setting aside the order dated 24.08.2022 passed in W.P.No.25863 of 2014. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.Akila Rajendran, Govt. Advocate *****JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matter was called on 28.10.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today none appears for the appellants.2. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) dsa Index :Yes/No ...
The Tamilnadu Fireworks vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.12979 of 2011 & 44160 of 2025 W.P.No.12979 of 2011 The Tamilnadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers Association Rep. by its President S.S.Vijayakumar TANFAMA Centre 442, Kamarajar Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai-9.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai-5.3. The Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories Sivakasi & Virudhunagar Circle Sivakasi. Respondent(s) W.P.No.44160 of 2025 M/s Simma Fireworks Factory Rep. by its Managing Partner Vignesh Kumar Having Office at No.74-A, Velayutham Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai -...
S.A.ASOKAN Vs S.G.Appaswami (deceased) S.G.Rangan(Deceased) 1.S.G.Venk ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 57 days in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171711 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171711 of 2025, is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. rri rri in...
S.A.ASOKAN Vs S.G.Appaswami (deceased) S.G.Rangan(Deceased) 1.S.G.Venk ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 10 days in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171712 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171712 of 2025, is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. rri rri in...
DHANALAKSHMI Vs Venkatamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.No.15155 of 2026 in CRP SR.No.199827 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition is filed to accept the cause title in CRP.SR.No.199827 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for.4. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. 23.06.2026 rri Note: Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petitions, after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »