Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesan. S Vs The Joint Director of Collegiate Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2025CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, O/o. Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai. 2.The Secretary, Ramasamy Tamil College, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.S.Naganathan, Principal-Incharge, Ramasamy Tamil College, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner as Principal- Incharge of Ramasamy Tamil College forthwith in the light of theorder passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.11709/Aa3/2022 dated 30.01.2023 as well as the representation made by the petitioner dated 07.02.2023. (Prayer amended vide order dated 20.06.2023 in WMP.(MD)No. 12244 of 2023 in WP.(MD)No.6705 of 2023) For Petitioner : Mr.A.Karthik For R1 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Ad...
Sri Lakshmi and Brothers Media Events Private Limited Vs The Assistant ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD)No.5712 to 5714 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4172, 4174, 4202, 4203, 4197 & 4198 of 2025 Sri Lakshmi and Brothers Media Events Private Limited Rep. by its Managing Director L.Adimoolam ... Petitioner -vs- Madurai - 625 020. ... Respondent COMMON PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in :-(i) Reference No. ZD330624008882G dated 03.06.2024 u/s.74 of the TNGST ZD330624008882G dated 03.06.2024 on the file of the respondent relating to the F.Y. 2020-21 and quash the same.(ii)Reference No. ZD330524207522T dated 23.05.2024 u/s.74 of the TNGST ZD330524207522T dated 23.05.2024 on the file of the respondent relating to the F.Y. 2018-19 and quash the same. (iii)Reference No. ZD330524206660S dated 23.06.2024 u/s.74 of the TNGST ZD330524206660S dated 23.05.2024 on the file of the respo...
Velammal Vs Theivam Agro Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
CMP(MD) No.4409 of 2024 in C.R.P(MD).No.SR19595 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR.J I am satisfied with the reason given in the affidavit filed in support of this revision, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 2.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise inorder and list the matter for hearing on03.07.2026. 3.Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.R.Ravikumar at the time of admission. 29.06.2026 Rmk 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Devi. J Vs The Vice Chancellor
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
2026:MHC:2327 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNED ON : 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.6339, 6340 of 2023 J.Devi ... Petitioner in both WPs Vs 1.The Vice Chancellor, Tamil University, Thanjavur. 2.The Registrar, Tamil University, Thanjavur. ... Respondents 1 & 2 in both WPs 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Thanjavur. ... 3rd Respondent in WP(MD).8747/2023 PRAYER in WP(MD).6760/2023 :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the notification issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/1187/2023 dated 20.03.2023 and quash the same. PRAYER in WP(MD).8747/2023 :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner as Professor Tamil Literature in ...
K.Vinay Kumar Vs Indira
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.This petition has been filed under Section 25 of Guardian & Wards Act, 1890, r/w Order 21 Rule 2 & 3 of Original Side Rules seeking for appointment of the petitioner as the legal guardian of his minor daughter V.Viyona, having born out of his wedlock with Isaivani.2. The minor child who was born on 05.02.2017. On 17.12.2019, thepetitioner's wife Isaivani committed suicide by hanging herself and died three days later at Kilpauk Medical Hospital, Chennai -10. Ever since the death of Isaivani, the minor child V.Viyona is in the custody of the respondent, who is the petitioner's mother in law. In such circumstances, this petition has been filed seeking for permanent custody of the minor child V.Viyona.3. Notice has been duly served on the respondent in O.P.No.290 of 2021 and despite service of notice, the respondent has not entered appearance till date or engaged any counsel to represent her interest.4. This Court, by way of abundant caution, also direct...
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Harigovind
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.9651 of 2026 in WA SR No.4718 of 20261. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Non-Corporate, Circle 3(1), Chennai 34. and another2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2(3) Chennai, 1st Floor Investigation Building, 46, MG Road, Chennai 34. Appellant(s) Vs1. Harigovind S/o.Shri Anandkumar Rengaswamy, 19 New No.45, Venues Colony, 2nd St, Alwarpet, Chennai 18. Respondent(s)For Appellant(s): Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Addl. Solicitor General of India Assisted by Mr. A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. A.N.R.Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel The Honble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the applicants.2. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 15.07.2026, on payment...
A.Maheswari Vs R.Banupriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.14660 of 2026 in A.S.SR.No.158307 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 132 days in representing the above First Appeal, is ordered. 24.06.2026 kmm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Manager Vs Valli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
CMP No.10431 of 2026 in CMA SR No.200928 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.RAJASEKAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in MCOP No.951 of 2018 on the file of the MACT Additional District Judge, FTC, Kancheepuram. 2.Notice had been directed to the respondents, notice had been served and proof affidavit had also been filed. But there is no appearance for the respondents. 3.It had been stated that owing to administrative reasons, there has been a delay of 21 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (C.V.K.J., ) (K.R.S.J., ) sli 24.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Ramaswami Vs P.Kanakavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.8370 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.45216 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Mr.K.Vinod, learned counsel who appeared on behalf of the third respondent, stated that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Though notice has been served on respondents 1, 2 and 4 and their names are printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.4. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 288 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 288 days, in the appeal. 24.06.2026 ham Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is, otherwise, inorder and list the same for admission in duecourse. https://w...
The State Of Tamil Nadu Vs Mangai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
C.M.P.No.7820 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.10908 of 2026 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J and R.SAKTHIVEL, J This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 122 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-06-2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »