Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Alagu Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.807 of 2026 M.Alagu ... Petitioner vs.1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police,(Crime No.72 of 2026) ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's father, the detenu namely A.Malaisamy, S/o.Arukugam, aged about 56 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.K.G.Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh Page No.1 of 4 Counsel for State of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side)ORDER[Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.] This petition is filed to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's father, the detenu namely, A.Malaisamy, S/o.Arukugam, aged about 56 ...
Selvi Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Deputy Superintendent of Po ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI1. Tmt.Selvi2. Tr.Palanisamy ... PetitionersVs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Thoothukudi Detachment (Cr.No.09 of 2021) ... Respondent Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to dispense with the production of certified copy of the Final Report in STC No.56 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil, in Crime No.9 of 2021 dated 15.11.2021 on the file of the respondent.For Petitioners : M/s.T.Seeni Syed Amma For Respondent : Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to dispense with the production of certified copy of the Final Report in STC No.56 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petiti...
M/s.Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Vs Assistant Provident Fund C ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)No.15181 of 2022 M/s.Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Railway Yard, Thirumangalam, Madurai District 625 706 Tamil Nadu Through its Manager Works ... Petitioner(s) vs.3. The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd, Madurai Main Branch, 33 North Chitrai Street, Madurai - 625 001. ... Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records from the file of the respondent no.1 herein No.TN/RO/MD/MDU/42158/Recovery/M-07/8F/2022 dated 10.08.2022 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M. Pandiarajan For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem, Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.V.VeerapandianORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, nothing further surviv...
Rajan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Koodankulam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CRL.MP(MD)No.12604 of 2026 in CRLA.(MD)SR.No.34119 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.AND R.POORNIMA, J This petition is filed to condone the delay of 198 days in filing the above appeal.2. Learned counsel for the State (Crl.Side) who takes notice for the respondent, has no objection in the delay being condoned and the appeal being numbered.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, delay is condoned and this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise inorder.(A.D.J.C, J.) (R.P, J) bala 30.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Ravichandran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Alangan ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR1. Ravichandran2. Gopalakrishnan3. Vedhanayagi4. Selvi5. Jayashree ... Petitioners Vs1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Alanganallur, Cr.No.440 of 2025.2. Achuthan... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned FIR in crime No. 440 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 on the file of 1st Respondent Police, and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Cr.No.440 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent police, seeking a direction to quash the FIR, wherein they are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections and 109, 115(2), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act ...
Maasana Konar (Died) Krishnammal Vs Arumugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI in Maasana Konar (Died) Krishnammal, ... Petitioner(s) - Vs. -1. Arumugam2. Maasanam3. Parvathi4. Petchi Ammal ... Respondent(s) Prayer : To set aside and restore the order passed in S.A.(MD).No. For Petitioners : Mr.S.R.Anbarasu For R1 : Mr.P.Prasad Pandian For R2 to R4 : No appearanceORDERThis Petition is filed to restore the order passed in S.A.(MD).No.2. On 18.07.2024, the second appeal was listed under the caption "For Dismissal." Even on that day, the learned counsel for the appellant did not appear. Therefore, the second appeal was dismissed for default.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that whenthe second appeal was listed on 18.07.2024, the counsel for the petitioner was suffering from severe back pain and was taking treatment and hence, he was not able to appear before this Court. Therefore, the second appeal was dismissed for default...
P.Azhagumani Vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR1. P.Azhagumani2. P. Sarvaratchagan3. R. Perumal ... Petitioners Vs2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police,3. Pandi... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioners and their family member on the guise of enquiry and except in accordance with law. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Shakulhameed For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R1 & R2ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction as against the 2nd respondent not to harass them on the guise of enquiry.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for therespondent 1 and 2 submits that the complaint as against the petitioners has been closed on 24.06.2026 and they would not be called for any enquiry. 3.With the above said observations, this Criminal...
Palanikumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Commissioner of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Palanikumar ... Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep., By the Commissioner of Police, Madurai,3. Vinotha... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his mother namely Koperundevi in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondent based on the representation given by the petitioner, dated 17.06.2026. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R1 & R2ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction as against the 2nd respondent not to harass him and his mother on the guise of enquiry.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for therespondent 1 and 2 submits that since it is a matrimonial dispute, they have referred the matter t...
I.Kavitha Vs The Director of School Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
W.M.P.(MD) No.13570 of 2026 in W.P.(MD) No.18339 of 2026MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.Production of the original impugned transfer order in impugned impugned proceedings in R.C.No.TO 05/2026/SAT, dated 17.06.2026, issued by the fourth respondent, is dispensed with for the present. 30.06.2026 (1/2) krk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M. Radhamuthukrishnan, Vs Govindan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
C.M.P(MD)No.8164 of 2026 in S.A(MD)SR No.51595 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 01 days in filing the second appeal. 2.Heard. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. 4.Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order. 30.06.2026 Ns https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »