Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thangaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs3. Marimuthu ... RespondentsPRAYER: C-41D. To issue a Direction, Directing the 2nd respondent police Not to Harass the petitioner and his wife and his sons under the guise of an enquiry based on the false complaint preferred by the 3rd respondent... For petitioner : Mr.K.G.Arun Kumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.Ram Sundar VijayarajORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, the complaint as against the petitioner has been closed on 29.05.2026 and he will not be called for any further enquiry.3. Recording the same, the criminal original petition stands closed. Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rgm To:R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.rgm...
M/s.ICICI Lombard General Insurace Company Limited, Vs Sudahar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.7797 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)No.537 of 2022K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking an order for substituted service of notice on the third respondent by way of paper publication in one issue of a local Tamil daily (Malai Malar) having circulation in Trichy District. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the records.3. Considering the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the third respondent by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Malar, in Trichy Edition, indicating the date of hearing as 22.07.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 12.07.2026.4. Post the matter on 22.07.2026. das 29.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Jahir Hussain Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD).No.13407 of 2026 A.Jahir Hussain ...Petitioner Vs ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the impugned online rejection order passed by the second respondent vide application No.TN-720260323484 dated 23.03.2026 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the respondents to issue legal heir certificate of the petitioner's grand-father namely, Ibramsha in the light of the order passed in W.P.No.7978 of 2025 dated 07.03.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Honble court For Petitioner : Ms.M.Benazir Begum For Respondents : Mrs.K.Shiva Shankari, Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the pe...
Prakash Vs The Commissioner of Police - Trichy City
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD).No.12555 of 2026 Prakash ... Petitioner Vs1. The Commissioner of Police - Trichy City, Trichirappalli Dsistrict.2. The Inspector of Police, Gandhi Market, Police Station, Trichirappalli District.3. Subash Chandrabose. ... RespondentsPRAYER: To direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner or interfere in the civil and monetary dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent under the guise of enquiry and consequently forbear the respondents from conducting any coercive action without due process of law. For petitioner : M/s.A.Aishwarya Caroline For R1 & R2 : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.B.Michael SebastinORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the 2 nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents ...
Periyandavar @ Suruliyandavar Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Po ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 12753 of 2026 1.Periyandavar @ Suruliyandavar 2.Sasi Manoj ...Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni District. (Crime No.201 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PRAYER :- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 439(i)(b) of Cr.P.C./483(i)(b) of BNS to modify the order dated 08.06.2026 made inThis petition has been filed to modify the order dated 08.06.2026 made in2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first petitioner is working as Revenue Inspector and the second petitioner is a student, studying in College. Hence, both petitioners may be permitted to appear before the respondent once in a week. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petiti...
S.Muthukumar Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep. by its The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.12290 of 2026 in Crl.A.(MD)No.559 of 2026B.PUGALENDHI, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to make necessary amendments in the cause title. 29.06.2026 (1/2) mbi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
T.Thilagavathi alias Dorathy Samadhanam Thilagavathi Vs The Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) No.13393 of 2026 T.Thilakavathi @ Dorathy Samadhanam Thilakavathi ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Secretary Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat, Fort St.George Chennai-600 009 2.The Director General of Police Office of the DGP No.1, Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 3.The Principal Accountant General (A&E) and Audit Audit Bhavan 361, Annasalai Teynampet, Chennai-600 018 4.The Commissioner of Police Pudukottai Main Road Opp.Central Prision Subramaniapuram Trichy-620 0235.The Superintendent of Police SP Office Pudukkottai Road Subramaniapuram Trichy-620 020 6.M.Jothi Ramalingam ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2026 and consequently forbearing...
M.Jose Claret, Vs The Director of School Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
W.M.P.(MD) No.13503 of 2026 in W.P.(MD) No.18247 of 2026MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.Production of the original impugnedorder issued by the fourth respondentherein in RC.No.TO 07/2026/SAT dated 17.06.2026, is dispensed with for the present. 29.06.2026 (1/2) krk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Karthikeyan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.12770 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.12520 and 12521 of 2026 Karthikeyan ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its, The Inspector of Police, Madurai City. (Crime No.882 of 2015) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant2. RahuramanInspector of Police, Madurai District. ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet in SC No.244 of 2022 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, in connection with Crime No.882 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police dated 16.10.2015 and quash the same as illegal as far as the petitioner concerned, and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit.For Petitioner : Mr.Arul Jenifer for Mr.L.Prabakaran For R1 : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)...
Alagar @ Alagesan @ Kedi Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 12570 of 2026 Alagar @ Alagesan @ Kedi ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Madurai District. (Crime No.123 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mrr.G.Suriya Ananth Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.04.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 103, 109, 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b) of BNS, in Crime No.123 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is A4, he joininghands with other accused, way laid the deceased persons, namely Kadugu @ Muniya...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »