Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Tamilnadu Fireworks vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.12979 of 2011 & 44160 of 2025 W.P.No.12979 of 2011 The Tamilnadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers Association Rep. by its President S.S.Vijayakumar TANFAMA Centre 442, Kamarajar Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai-9.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai-5.3. The Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories Sivakasi & Virudhunagar Circle Sivakasi. Respondent(s) W.P.No.44160 of 2025 M/s Simma Fireworks Factory Rep. by its Managing Partner Vignesh Kumar Having Office at No.74-A, Velayutham Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai -...
S.A.ASOKAN Vs S.G.Appaswami (deceased) S.G.Rangan(Deceased) 1.S.G.Venk ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 57 days in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171711 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171711 of 2025, is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. rri rri in...
S.A.ASOKAN Vs S.G.Appaswami (deceased) S.G.Rangan(Deceased) 1.S.G.Venk ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 10 days in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171712 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filing the above CRP.SR.No.171712 of 2025, is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. rri rri in...
DHANALAKSHMI Vs Venkatamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.No.15155 of 2026 in CRP SR.No.199827 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition is filed to accept the cause title in CRP.SR.No.199827 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for.4. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petition after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. 23.06.2026 rri Note: Registry is directed to list the above Civil Revision Petitions, after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order, on 25.06.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Meharban vs Indian Overseas Bank
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.5035 of 2026 Meharban W/o.Late B.Mohamad Sharrif No.6, Adhireddy Lane, Vikkiravandi Villupuram - 605652. Petitioner(s) Vs Indian Overseas Bank Rep by its Authorised Officer No.719, Sri Santhinathan House Nehruji Road, Villupuram. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration to declare the impugned E- Auction Sale Notice dated 07.01.2026 in respect of petition scheduled property as null and void. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Thilak Narayanan For Respondent(s):Mr.E.Om Prakash Senior Counsel for Mrs.V.RajeswariORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of declaration to declare the E-Auction Sale ...
Sunrise Chennai Distributor (P) Ltd., vs the Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Sunrise Chennai Distributor (P) Ltd., Rep. By Director Selva Backyaraj, Old No.31/ New No.99, Bahibullah Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. Petitioner Vs1. The Authorized Officer 2.M/s.R.P.Rajarajan Associates, No.105, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 And At No.39, Habibullah Road, Respondents T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to hand over all the movable assets belonging to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. P.Rajandran (Through Video Conferencing). For Respondents : Mr. E.Hariharan, for R1. Mr. S.Babu, for R2.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) When the writ petition was taken up for consideration on 24.04.2024, there was no representation fo...
The DGM (T) And Project Director Vs The District Collector and Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.No.14953 of 2026 in Arb Appeal No.SR27736 of 2026P.VELMURUGAN, J.andK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [PVJ] [KGTJ] 23.06.2026 cgi Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Nandhini vs the Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.Nandhini No.2A, Buddhar Street Pennadam Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District Petitioner Vs 3.M/s. Nandhini Traders Selvaraj Proprietor No 1 /344g Pattuthurai Road Thalaivasal Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioners representation dated 18.03.2024 within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : No AppearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) When the writ petition was taken for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.2. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, WMP No.11305 of ...
Varadharaj @ Varadharaju, Vs Pappal,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.Nos.11297,11300,11303,11305 and 11306 of 2025 in C.M.A.S.R.Nos.41089,41090,41091, 41092 and 41093 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1129 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 1129 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimants/petitioners shall deposit an amount of Rs.500/- each to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai, and it is also made clear that the claimants/petitioners are not entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 1129 days, in the appeal.3. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.M.B.Raghavan, learned counsel for the second respondent, when the matter is listed for admission. 23.06.2026 vca Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is ot...
V.Mamta vs V.Vimalan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. V.MamtaProprietor of Evolve Business Ventures 18/1, S.kariappa Road, Model House Cross Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560004 also office at Ground Floor, No.84/5C, Old No.48, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, chennai-6000072. V.Mamta Director, Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 4th Floor, Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-560004 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. V.Vimalan Proprietor M/s.Ayappa Enterprises, No.65, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai-6000292. Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 4th Floor, 18/1, S.Kariappa Road, Model House Cross Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore-5600043. Anibran Dutta Chowdhury Director, Travstar Retail Pvt. Ltd. 18111, Prestige Shantiniketan, Whitefielf Main Road, Whitefield Bengaluru-5600484. Trilogue Retail Llp T1, Royal Nest Apartment, 613, 5th Main OMBR Layout Banaswadi, Banglore Karnataka-560043 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »