Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maasana Konar (Died) Krishnammal Vs Arumugam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI in Maasana Konar (Died) Krishnammal, ... Petitioner(s) - Vs. -1. Arumugam2. Maasanam3. Parvathi4. Petchi Ammal ... Respondent(s) Prayer : To set aside and restore the order passed in S.A.(MD).No. For Petitioners : Mr.S.R.Anbarasu For R1 : Mr.P.Prasad Pandian For R2 to R4 : No appearanceORDERThis Petition is filed to restore the order passed in S.A.(MD).No.2. On 18.07.2024, the second appeal was listed under the caption "For Dismissal." Even on that day, the learned counsel for the appellant did not appear. Therefore, the second appeal was dismissed for default.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that whenthe second appeal was listed on 18.07.2024, the counsel for the petitioner was suffering from severe back pain and was taking treatment and hence, he was not able to appear before this Court. Therefore, the second appeal was dismissed for default...
Poompuhar College (Autonomous) Vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissi ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)No.17145 of 2022 Poompuhar College (Autonomous) Rep. by its Principal, College Main Road, Melaiyur 609 107, Sirkali Taluk Mayiladuthurai District. ... Petitioner(s) vs. Kumbakonam 612 001. ... Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in No.Recoery/CB/RO-TRY/1565873/CP-3/KUM/2021-2022, dated 17.02.2022, quash the same and forbear the respondents from taking any action against the petitioner college as the same is exempted under section 16 of the Employees Provident Fund Act.For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Standing CounselORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of this writ ...
M/s. Sarveswaran Enterprises Vs The Chairman cum Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.18325 and 18329 of 2022 M/s.Sarveswaran Enterprises Rep. through its Partner, Koteeswaran ... Petitioner(s) vs.5.Mr. S. Yogaraj. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records of the 3rd respondent pertaining to the tender summary reports (Rejection Order) dated 07.10.2022 derived through e-tender of the Labour Contract under specification no. CE/TTPS/SE/M-II /No. 237/2022-2023 and quash it as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to treat the petitioners tender as one fulfilled with the conditions of Bid Qualification on account of the payment of EPF, ESI etc, pending with 3rd respondent and give work order. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for Mr.K.K.SamyFor R1 to R4 : Mr.Anand Gopalan for M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For R5 : Mr....
Kannan vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.14852 & 14853 of 2016 Kannan ... Petitioner Vs 3.D.J.Kennedy, Taluk Cable Operator, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, GDR Vision, Sathankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pursuant to the impugned order of the 1st respondent vide proceedings in A.D11/1291/2015 dated 10.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents not to extend the lease period of the 3rd respondent as TCO for Sathankulam Taluk beyond the stipulated period of one year granted as per the impugned allotment order made by the first respondent in favour of the third respondent in his proceedings in A.D11/1291/2015, dated 10.02.2016.For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.J.R.Anni...
Gnanambal Ammal vs Ganesa Udayar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Gnanambal Ammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.Ganesa Udayar Ayemanickathammal (Died) 2.Valliappa Ammal 3.Ramamirtham Ammal 4.Manimekalai R.Pandian (Died) 5.R.Rajendran 6.R.Kalavathi 7.R.Kumar 8.R.Parthiban 9.R.Mala 10.R.Arumugam 11.Chandra 12.Prabaharan 13.Sathish ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 514 days in filing the above C.R.P. Prayer in C.R.P(MD).No.SR9876 of 2017: To set aside the judgment and decree passed in C.M.A.No.46 of 2010 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Thanjavur, dated 06.04.2015 which was reversed in S.O.P.No. 54 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, dated 29.03.2010 and allow the civil revision petition.ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement ...
Dr.William Jebes Bensam, vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)No.17301 of 2017 William Jebes Bensam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, 2.Deputy Director, Kanyakumari Division, Tirunelveli. 3.The District Collector, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Member Secretary, Local Town Planning Officer, Raman Pillai Street, Nagercoil, 5.The Municipal Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipality, Nagercoil,6.A.Vins Anto 7.Dr.Jasmine Asir 8.Ganapathia Pillai 9.C.Mary Janet 10.V.Vincent Jeyaseelan 11.Mary Augustine 12.Jacob Soundararajan 13.A.Shaji 14.Aliee Janet 15.V.K.Madhusoothanan 16.Sulochana 17.Premkumar 18.Suresh Moorthy ... Respondents (R6 to R18 are impleaded vide order dated 10.09.2025 in W.M.P(MD)No.14330 of 2019) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent No.5 from evicting the petitioner or demolishing the petitioner's buildin...
M. Sheik Mansoor, vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.20192 of 2017 & 5589 of 2018 M.Sheik Mansoor ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate Office, 2.The Ottapidaram Panchayat Union Council, Represented by its Special Officer/block Development Officer, Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Ottapidaram Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, 3.M/s.Suzlan Gujarat Wind Park Limited, No.5, Shrimali Society, Near Shree Krishna Complex, Navrungpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380 009. 4.The Secretary to the Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, St. George Fort, Chennai. 5.The Chief Engineer, Non Conventional Energy Sources, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Annasalai, Chennai. 6.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, 7.The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. ... Respondents(R4 to...
Singaravelu Vs Veeraiah (Since Died), Meenakshi (Since Died) 1. Raja @ ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.18284 of 2025 in S.A.(MD)No.309 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to bring on record the petitioners / appellants 1 and 2 as legal representatives of the deceased third appellant in the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons assigned, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the main papers. 30.06.2026 (1/5) csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Singaravelu Vs Veeraiah (Since Died), Meenakshi (Since Died) 1. Raja @ ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.18296 of 2025 in S.A.(MD)No.309 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to bring on record the seventh respondent as legal representative of the deceased 8th respondent in the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons assigned, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the main papers. 30.06.2026 (2/5) csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Chinnasamy Vs C.Muthulakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR and C.M.P(MD).No.18206 of 2025 P.Chinnasamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.C.Muthulakshmi 2.V.Deepika 3.Minor.V.Harishram rep., through his mother and natural guardian 1st petitioner ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 03.07.2025 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.14 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Srivilliputhur by allowing this civil revision petition with costs. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.S.MuniyandiORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents submit that the main suit itself had been disposed of as settled before the lok-adalat on 12.06.2026. 2.In view of the same, this civil revision petition has become ininfructuous. Accordingly, this Civil Revisi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »