Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.S.Subramanian, Vs Ramalakshmi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
This revision has been preferred only based on the online case status. The order impugned in this revision cannot be revised based on online case status. The petitioner is required to furnish either certified copy of the impugned docket order or online order dated 18.11.2025. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. 2.The petitioner is directed to produce either certified or online copy of the impugned docket order dated 18.11.2025 in E.P.No.39 of 2024 in O.S.No. 166 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ambasammudram. 3.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition on production of the certified copy or online order copy dated 18.11.2025, if the civil revision petition is otherwise in order. Rmk Rmk...
Mohammed Saleem Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in CRL OP(MD)No.8341 of 2026 Mohammed Saleem Petitioner(s) Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by, The Forest Range Officer, (W.L.O.R.No.3 of 2026) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rameez Ajmal Khan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Prayer: To relax the condition imposed on 'the petitioner shall report before the respondent police once in a week i.e. on Every Saturday at 10.30 a.m.' in Crl.OP(MD).No.8341 of 2026 dated 28.04.2026.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8341 of 2026 dated 28.04.2026 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police once in a week i.e., on Every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has...
Lakshmi @ Mahalakshmi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy S ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in Crl.A.(MD)No.228 of 2026 Lakshmi @ Mahalakshmi Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Theni District. (Crime No.32 of 2026) 2.Indira Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Manikandan For Respondent(s): Mrs.V.Moushica, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.Sahaya Philomin Raj for R2 Prayer: To relax the condition No.6(iii) imposed by this Court in Crl.A.(MD)No.228 of 2026 dated 12.03.2026.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.A.(MD)No.228 of 2026 dated 12.03.2026.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent submits that the petitioner has complied with the condition for 101 days.3. In view of the above submission, the condition imposed on the petitioner to report beforethe Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam Sub Division, Thenkarai Police Station, Theni District, daily ...
Syed Jeelani R Vs The Superintending Engineer/Executive Engineer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD).No.13419 of 2026 R.Syed Jeelani ...Petitioner Vs Periya Milaguparai, Trichy-620 020. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent not to put up any structure and interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Old S.F.No.1 part New No.208 over an extent of 42.51.5 hectare Samayapuram Village until the same adjudicated in Civil Court. For Petitioner : Mrs.P.Malini For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for TNEBORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connecte...
Selvaraj, Vs Malliga Jothi alias Jothi Mallammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.7827 of 2026 in C.M.P(MD)No.566 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.459 of 2014K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking an order for substituted service of notice on the second respondent in C.M.P(MD)No.566 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.459 of 2014 by way of paper publication in one issue of a local Tamil daily (Malai Murasu) having circulation in Dindigul District. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the records.3. Considering the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the second respondent second respondent in C.M.P(MD)No.566 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.459 of 2014 by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Murasu, in Dindigul Edition, indicating the date of hearing as 24.07.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 14.07.2026.4. Post the matter on 24.07.2026. das 29.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov....
Ayyadurai Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Ayyadurai ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep. by., Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER: To direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry and pass such further or order other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and circumstances of this case and thus render justice. For petitioner : Mr.B.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side)ORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, there is no complaint as against the petitioner herein and the petitioner will not be called for any further enquiry.3. Recording the same, the criminal original petition stands closed. Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rgm To: Virudhu...
P. Arunagirisamy Vs The Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP (MD) No.13405 of 2026 1.P.Arunagirisamy 2.V.Vellasamy ... Petitioner(s) vs.1. The Director,2. The Joint Director,3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Officer,4. The District Educational Officer (Secondary),5. The District Educational Officer, (Elementary),6. Ariyanayagipuram Hindu Nadar,Uravinmurai Committee Higher Secondary School, Represented by its School Committee, Ariyanayagipuram, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the appeal dated 28.03.2026 and pass necessary order to initiate further action in the administration of the fifth respondent as per the procedure in the interest of justice .For Petitioner : Mr. V.Rajiv Rufus For R1 - R5 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff...
Anbazhagan @ Ignatius Anbalagan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and CRL.MP.(MD)No.12519 of 2026 Anbazhagan @ Ignatius Anbalagan ... Petitioner Vs State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Crime No.154 of 2009 ... Respondent PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.154 of 2009 dated 13.07.2009 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Naveen Muthusaravana For Respondent : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh, Government Advocate(Crl.side)ORDERPresent criminal original petition has been filed by the accused No.8 in Cr.No.154 of 2009 on the file of the respondent Police to quash FIR wherein the petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 353 IPC and Sections 2 & 3 of TNPPDL Act. 2.According to the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side), the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistra...
Ramasamy, President (Under vs the Joint Registrar of Co-Op
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)No.5258 of 2018 Ramasamy ... Petitioner -vs- Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.1797/2016 Sa.Pa. Dated 23.02.2018 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondents : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Counsel for the State of Tamil NaduORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is dead and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
Thangaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs3. Marimuthu ... RespondentsPRAYER: C-41D. To issue a Direction, Directing the 2nd respondent police Not to Harass the petitioner and his wife and his sons under the guise of an enquiry based on the false complaint preferred by the 3rd respondent... For petitioner : Mr.K.G.Arun Kumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R3 : Mr.Ram Sundar VijayarajORDERThe present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, the complaint as against the petitioner has been closed on 29.05.2026 and he will not be called for any further enquiry.3. Recording the same, the criminal original petition stands closed. Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rgm To:R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.rgm...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »