N.Mallika vs the Director,

N.Mallika vs The Director,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 26, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1729985

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1729985
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Decided On: Jun 26, 2025
Case Number: WP/17472/2007

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Mallika

Respondent

The Director,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 26.06.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice mummineni sudheer kumar 1.n.mallika 2.a.ramasamy 3.s.paul raj 4.s.thangavel aasari ... petitioners vs.3.t.uthanu ... respondents prayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondents resulting in the 2nd respondent's impugned orders dated 22.10.99 passed in roc.no.p3/11559/98 and order dated 08.12.99 passed in roc.no.p3/11559/98, quash the same and direct the respondents to restore their original seniority and fix the seniority above the 3rd respondent as per the confirmed seniority list dated 22.05.92 and 4.9.92 vide roc.no.p3/6777/91-12 and roc.no.p3/13127/92 issued by the 2nd respondent.for petitioners : no appearance for respondents : mr.k.h.ravikumar government advocateorderthis matter came up for consideration before this court on 23.06.2025. as there was no representation on 23.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. today, inspite of matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioners either in the pre-lunch or post-lunch session.2. in the circumstances and taking into consideration the fact thatthis matter pertains to the year 2003 and thereafter, re-numbered in the year 2007, this court does not see any justification for adjourning the matter any further. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. dpa index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation : yes / no tomummineni sudheer kumar, j.dpa

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR 1.N.Mallika 2.A.Ramasamy 3.S.Paul Raj 4.S.Thangavel Aasari ... Petitioners Vs.
3.T.Uthanu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondents resulting in the 2nd respondent's impugned orders dated 22.10.99 passed in ROC.No.P3/11559/98 and order dated 08.12.99 passed in ROC.No.P3/11559/98, quash the same and direct the respondents to restore their original seniority and fix the seniority above the 3rd respondent as per the confirmed seniority list dated 22.05.92 and 4.9.92 vide ROC.No.P3/6777/91-12 and ROC.No.P3/13127/92 issued by the 2nd respondent.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government Advocate

ORDER

This matter came up for consideration before this Court on 23.06.2025. As there was no representation on 23.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, inspite of matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioners either in the pre-lunch or post-lunch session.

2. In the circumstances and taking into consideration the fact that

this matter pertains to the year 2003 and thereafter, re-numbered in the year 2007, this Court does not see any justification for adjourning the matter any further. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. dpa Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation : Yes / No To

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

dpa

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties N.Mallika vs The Director, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar