Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gnanambal Vs. The Tahsildar, Gandarvakottai and Taluk, Pudukkottai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 14.6.2016 and 13.7.2016 to measure the Petitioner's land fixing four boundaries in S.No.403/6(Old S.No.202/3) , measuring an extent of 0.08.5 ares in Koviloor Village, Gandarvakkottai Taluk, Pudukkottai District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, the subject-property was measured earlier and only on that basis, she was granted patta. In order to avoid unnecessary trouble and to purchase peace, the Petitioner desires to measure her land with the help of the Respondent, giving notice to the boundary owners. 5. It comes to be known that the Petitioner paid necessary fees before the Sub-Treasury, Gandharvakkottai on 14.06.2016. In-sp...
C.J. Hemanth Vs. The District Transport Officer, Regional Transport Of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 02.06.2016 and to transfer the name in petitioner's favour in the Registration Certificate for the COROLLA ALTIS CAR being Registration No.TN 60 E 2608.) 1. This writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2016 and to transfer the name in favour of the petitioner in the Registration Certificate for the car being Registration No.TN 60 E 2608. 2. Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, learned Government Advocate was put on notice. 3. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case of the petitioner, this Court only directs the respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 02.06.2016, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period ...
Sundarraj Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the Petitioner's appeal dated 20.3.2015 by affording personal hearing to the Petitioner within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner his appeal, dated 20.3.2015 is pending before the First Respondent as on date. Therefore, he has filed the present Writ Petition for passing of an order by this Court to dispose of his appeal, dated 20.3.2015 by affording personal hearing to him within the time frame to be determined by this Court. 5. In view of the fact that the Petitioner's appeal, dated 20.3.2015 is pending before the First Respondent without any progress or disposal, till date, this Court without expressing any opinion on the m...
A. Mohamed Sirajudeen and Others Vs. The Managing Director, The Tamil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits to the petitioner in view of representations dated 11.07.2016.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has obt...
M. Rajendran Vs. The District Collector, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to delete the wrong entry made in the petitioner's Patta Passbook No.16464 by dispose and pass final orders on his application u/s. 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, 1983, dated 16.02.2016 within the time limit stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 4. According to the petitioner, he had purchased a land at Pitchandar Koil Village in Natham Sy.No.115/2A, 2R and new Survey No.115/23 in the year 1981, measuring an extent of 23/8 cents and obtained a patta in the year 2002. When that be the facts situation, wrongly his wife's name viz., Malarkodi and his brother (late) Shanmugam's wife's name viz. (Late) Lakshmi were included in the patta and hence, he prayed for removing their names by pres...
G. Palanikumaran Vs. The Passport Authority Officer, Regional Passport ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue new passport to the Petitioner on the basis of the Petitioner's application dated 12.09.2013.) 1. The learned counsel on record for the petitioner has circulated a letter, dated 01.07.2016 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said letter is placed on record. 2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
T. Udhayakala Vs. The District Collector, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the person or the body of the detenu/petitioner's husband namely Thayapararaj, S/o.Kathirvelu, aged about 35 years before this Court and set him at liberty.) 1. The petitioner, who is a Sri Lankan Refugee and mother of three minor children, has come up with this Habeas Corpus Petition, to direct the respondents to produce her husband, by name, Thayapararaj, S/o.Kathirvelu, before this Court, alleging that he is illegally detained by the police. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the family members were detained by the police on allegation of travelling without passport. The detenu-Thayapararaj was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram. The convict has undergone the imprisonment and was released on 08 October, 2015. It is the contention of the petitioner that thereafter, he was illegally detained by the res...
The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai and Others V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order made in W. P. (MD) No. 7296 of 2013, dated 03. 01. 2014.) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to an order made in W.P.(MD)No.7296 of 2013, dated 03.01.2014, by which, the Writ Court has set aside the order, dated 17.02.2008 in P.R.No.03/07, passed by the Commandant, TSP IX Battalion, Manimuthar, Tirunelveli, 3rd appellant herein, and also the order, dated 25.03.2013, passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police, Trichy, 2nd appellant herein. 2. Facts of the case are that the respondent's father, died on 05.12.1996, in harness, while he was working as cook. The respondent signed his verification roll on 26.09.2000. He was appointed as Grade II Police Constable on 01.07.2002, on compassionate grounds. Thereafter, on 19.05.2006, he was promoted as Nayak. In the year 2007, a charge memo, dated 03.03.2007, was served on the respondent, on the grounds that he had suppressed the factum of employment of ...
The Competent Authority SAFEM (FOP) and NDPS Acts, Chennai Vs. M. Khad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in proceedings in FPA NO.33/MDS/2005, dated 30.7.2010, received by the petitioner on 13.12.2010 and to quash the same.) R. Mahadevan, J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the order of the 2nd respondent dated 30.7.2010, setting aside the order of forfeiture dated 30.9.2005 passed by the petitioner. 2. The facts of case, in a nutshell, of the petitioner are that the wife of the 1st respondent Halthija Maimoon was convicted for violation of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (herein after called as FERA) for foreign currency violations by order dated 1.9.1986 of the Additional Chief Magistrate, Madurai. The 1st respondent being the spouse of the convict, comes within the definition of relative as per the explanation 2 of section 2(2)(c) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulator (Forfeiture of Property) Act, ...
K.M. Manoharan Vs. The Tahsildar, Dindigul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-19-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to measure and demarcate the petitioner properties comprised in Survey No. 826/13B, 826/14, 826/15 situated at Pallapatti Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District and lay boundary stones in all four boundaries of it based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2016 within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the petitioner, his representation dated 05.07.2016 making a request for measuring and demarcating the properties in Survey No. 826/13B, 826/14, 826/15 situated at Pallapatti Village, Dindigul Taluk, Dindigul District and lay boundary stones in all four boundaries, based on the said representation, has not met with positive response from the concerned authorities. ...