Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Jerin Vs. The Chief Manager, State Bank of Travancore and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the payment of the Petitioner for a tune of Rs.1,19,201/- (Rupees One Lakh Nineteen Thousand Twon Hundred and One Only) towards the Educational Loan with loan amount Number: 6705969255 availed by the Petitioner and waive the interest portion of the said loan as per the guidelines for subsidy scheme for Educational loan availed upto 31.03.2016 and outstanding as on 31.12.2013, on the representation of the Petitioner dated 07.04.2015.) 1. According to the Petitioner, he availed an educational loan from the Second Respondent / Branch Manager, State Bank of Travancore, Irenipuram Branch,Kanyakumari District, bearing Loan No.67015969255, to the tune of Rs.1,19,000/-, in the year 2006. By availing the loan, he had undergone his under Graduation in Mechanical Engineering, from Vins Christian College of Engineering, Nagercoil. Despite m...
U. Chandrapaul Vs. Annamarial
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.565 of 2014 in O.S.No.266 of 2013 dated 27.04.2015 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.) 1. This revision arises out of the order passed by I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli in I.A.No.565 of 2014 in O.S.No.266 of 2013 dated 27.04.2015. 2. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The respondent, as plaintiff filed a suit against the petitioner for recovery of possession. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed an application in I.A.No.565 of 2014 under Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of C.P.C, for amendment of the schedule of the property. The learned Judge having found that the new prayer would not change the character or nature of the suit, allowed the application. 4. Considering the above facts, I do not find any illegality or perversity in the order impugned in this ...
Moorthi Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records relating to the FIR in Crime No.9 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.) 1. Alleging that, case registered against the petitioner is out of baseless apprehension that the petitioner would fly to Singapore without marrying the victim girl, and that the case is totally false and therefore, the case registered against the petitioner is liable to be quashed, this petition has been filed. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.9 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 417 and 376 IPC on the file of the 1st respondent police, has been registered against the petitioner/accused. Gist of the complaint: 3. In the complaint, it is alleged that the petitioner and the victim girl had been in love with each other for five years, that the petitioner had been working in Singapore for sometime, that on the promise of marriage, he had sexual intercourse with the victim an...
P. Samiappan Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Cor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents by considering his representation dated 07.04.2016 to release his "Terminal Benefits" as the petitioner got superannuated on 30.06.2015, with interest (1) Gratuity (2) Earn Leave surrender amount (3) D.A. Arrears, (4) One month pending pension amount (July 2015) and other pay settlement benefit amount within a stipulated time fixed by this Court and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents by considering his representation dated 07.04.2016 to release his "Terminal Benefits" as the petitioner got superannuated on 30.06.2015, with interest (1) Gratuity (2) Earn Leave surrender amount (3) D.A. Arrears, (4) One month pending pension amount (July 2015) and other pay settlement benefit amount within a stipulated time fixed by this Court and pass further orders...
G. Senthilkumar Vs. The Executive Officer, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondent pertaining to its order in Na.Ka.No.45/2016, dated 18.07.2016, and to quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to grant plan approval to the petitioner by considering the application of the petitioner dated 30.04.2016 for the construction put up by the petitioner in the property in S.No.1/38A, situated at Mekkarai Village, Tirunelveli District.) K.K. Sasidharan, J. 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the notice dated 18 July, 2016, whereby and whereunder, the Executive Officer, First Grade Town Panchayat, Achanpudur, Tirunelveli District, called upon the petitioner to remove the unauthorized construction within seven days, failing which, it was indicated that further action would be taken in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The petitioner was gi...
R. Ramkumar and Another Vs. The District Collector, Office of the Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to directing the second respondent to issue token to take Clay Sand in S.No.28 with an extent of 3.52.0 Hectares of Government Poramboke in Kunnur Village in Andipatti Taluk, as per the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.44/Mines/2014, dated 10.6.2016.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Selvam Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the First Respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 22.2.2016 on merits and in accordance with law and subsequently dispose of the same within the time frame fixed by this Court forthwith.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. At this stage, Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the Respondents No.1 and 2. 3. To avoid an avoidable delay, notice to the Respondents No.3 and 4 is dispensed with. 4. The Petitioner has focussed the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the First Respondent/The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelvel,i to consider his representation, dated 22.2.2016 on merits and in accordance with Law and later to dispose of the same within the time frame to be determined by this Court. 5. According to the P...
Saraswathi Narayanan College (Autonomous), Perungudi, Madurai Rep. by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-25-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings No.F 2-28(15)2007(AC), dated 07.12.2009 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to permit the petitioner to retain its autonomous status.) 1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner produced a copy of the order passed by the first respondent dated Nil, April, 2016 vide proceedings bearing No.2-28(15)/2007(AC/Review) by which the autonomous status for the petitioner institution has been granted for the period from 2015-2016 to 2020-2021. The autonomous states was also recognised for the period from 2013-2014 to 2014-2015 by ex-post-facto approval. Hence, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Having regard to th...
A. Jothiramalingam and Another Vs. The Executive Officer / Joint Commi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
Common Judgment S.S. Sundar, J. 1. These Review Applications are filed by the Writ Petitioner in W.P.(MD)Nos.21429 to 21433 of 2015 challenging the final order passed by this Court on 15.04.2016. 2. Since several grounds are raised relating to mistake of fact and error apparent in the previous judgment of this Court with reference to the findings recorded by this Court, we proceed to deal with these cases, after narrating the facts and events with reference to the documents filed before us so as to consider the points raised herein effectively. 3. The petitioners have filed W.P.(MD)No.21429 to 21433 of 2015 for issuing writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents herein from evicting the petitioners from their shops situated in Survey No.878/1 and other subdivisions of S.No.878. The facts disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitions has to be briefly summarised as under: 3.1. All the petitioners have constructed shops and are running business. All the shops are loc...
M. Gomathinayagam Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to repair petitioner's water supply connection pipe line in petitioner's water fee assessment number 153 by considering the representation of the petitioner's dated 03.06.2016.) 1. Mr.M.Gomathinayagam, is a resident of Gandhiji second street, Tirunagar, Madurai. He applied for water connection from the erstwhile Tirunagar Town Panchayat by paying requisite fee. His assessment number is 153 and accordingly, water connection was given in the month of October 2006. While so, the water was not properly supplied from 31.05.2007, still, the respondent demanded water tax from the petitioner, forcing him to file a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.3577 of 2015, wherein, an interim order was passed. While so, on 01.08.2015, the water connection pipe was damaged by Corporation drainage contractors. Since the request of the petitioner to restore the water connecti...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »