Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Principal, Sakthi Vinayagar Hindu Vidhyalaya, Chidambra Nagar, Tho ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of this Court dated 28.06.2016 passed in W.P(MD)No.10516 of 2016.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by the fourth respondent in the writ petition - Principal of a Vidhyalaya at Thoothukudi. The first respondent herein - parent of a student of the school of which the appellant is the Principal, sought for a direction to permit his son to continue his education in XI Standard in the said school. 2. Heard Mr.Isaac Mohanlal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned Counsel for the first respondent/writ petitioner and Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 to 4. 3. The essential grievance of the writ petitioner is that his son has been unjustly denied admission in XI Standard, after the writ petitioner's son has passed out X Standard from that very school duly obtaining a decent grade in the X S...
G. Ramadoss Vs. State, rep.by the Inspector of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai, in Copy Application No.64 of 2016 in C.C.No.5 of 2015 and set aside the order, dated 29.06.2016.) 1. The de facto complainant in C.C.No.5 of 2015, aggrieved by the non-compliance of C.A.No.64 of 2016 in C.C.No.5 of 5 of 2015, by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Court for Anti-Land Grabbing Cases, Madurai, has directed this revision. 2. In this case, the prosecution obtained Handwriting Expert's Report based on certain questioned documents and certain admitted documents. The Report of the Handwriting Expert has been furnished to the accused. Now, the request is not coming from the accused, it is coming from the victim / de facto complainant. Admittedly, the complainant got the copy of the Handwriting Expert's Report. He filed C.A.No.64 of 2016 for furnishing ...
Helen Vs. A. Chellapandi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, praying this Court to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.12 of 2016 on the file of Family Court, Karaikal(previously H.M.O.P.No.57 of 2014, on the file of the Additional District Court, Karaikal) and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai.) 1. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.12 of 2016 on the file of Family Court, Karaikal(previously H.M.O.P.No.57 of 2014 on the file of the Additional District Court, Karaikal) and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the case may be transferred to the file of the Judge,Family Court,Madurai. 3. Recording the above submissions, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and the ...
A. Deisy Vs. The District Elementary Educational Officer and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners seniority at the 1st place in the Promotion panel as on 01.01.2016 for promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant (English) in Madurai west Panchayat Union and to promote and post the petitioner as BT Assistant in English in the existing vacancy of BT Assistant (English) at Madurai west panchayat union Middle school at athalai or any other vacancy in other middle school functioning under Madurai West Panchayat Union Jurisdiction.) 1. Mr.A.Deisy, is a Secondary Grade Teacher, presently serving in the Panchayat Union Elementary School at Chakkiliankulam. The next avenue of promotion to her is B.T.Assistant. Since 2015, she has been shown as first in the promotion panel prepared by the respondents. While so, the counseling is scheduled on 06.08.2016. According to counseling schedule, B.T.promotion should be made first and the...
Kathirvel Vs. Sellammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in C.M.A.No.22 of 2005, dated 13.2.2006, on the file of the District Court, Karur confirming the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.827 of 2004 in O.S.No.248 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur.) 1. This revision is directed against the order passed by the District Judge, Karur in C.M.A.No.22 of 2005, dated 13.2.2006 confirming the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.827 of 2004 in O.S.No.248 of 2004, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur. 2. The Petitioner along with the second respondent filed a suit against the first respondent and two other persons for partition claiming 1/5th share in the suit property and for recovery of possession. The suit was decreed ex-parte on 6.6.2002. The ex-parte decree was set aside by the learned District Munsif, Karur in I.A.No.827 of 2004. The s...
Kutty @ Jeyasubramaniya Raja Vs. State represented by the Inspector of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order dated 17.05.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.7050 of 2016 in C.C.No.325 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam.) Aggrieved by the dismissal of his discharge petition in Crl.M.P.No.7050 of 2016 in C.C.No.325 of 2014 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, the accused has directed this revision. 2. Cr.No.753 of 2013 has been registered by the police as against the petitioner. After investigation, the Police filed the final report before the said Magistrate for offences under Sections 420, 341, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., on the ground that the petitioner had cheated the de-facto complainant to the tune of Rs.73,265/- and on 21.09.2013, at about 9.30 a.m., near a place in Rajapalayam, he had wrongfully restrained him and abused him in filthy language and also criminally intimidated him. 3. The learned Magistrate coming to the conclusion that there is ground to proce...
S.S. Perumal, Tank Contractor, Madurai Vs. The Senior Regional Manager ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records in connection with the impugned proceedings of the respondent dated 20.01.2016 in MDRO/VK/RET and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to restore the contract awarded to the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner calls in question the order dated 20.01.2016 passed by the respondent by which the respondent terminated the contract awarded to the petitioner inter alia blacklisted and prohibited him from participating in the future contracts that may be awarded by the respondent. 2. The petitioner would contend that he was awarded a contract on 01.03.2015 by the respondent for five years commencing from 01.03.2013 to 31.03.2018 to run Trucks with capacity of 12 KL and above to transport bulk white oil petroleum products. An agreement dated 01.03.2015 was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent. In order to give effect to...
M. Mahalingam Vs. The District Collector, Karur District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A1/986/2016 dated 15.07.2016 and quash the same.) 1. Mr. M. Mahalingam, who is the elected Panchayat President of K.Pettai Village Panchayat, Kulithalai Union, Karur Distrct, challenges the impugned order passed by the Inspector of Panchayat, namely, the District Collector, dated 15.07.2016, on various grounds. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following submissions:- (1) Firstly, as per Section 205(1) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994, if the Inspector of Panchayat, on his own motion or on a representation in writing signed by not less than two-thirds of the sanctioned strength of the Village Panchayat containing a statement of charges against the President and presented in person to the Inspector by two-thirds of the members of the Village...
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
1. The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law: 2. Whether all the incidents and cruelty rendered by the Respondent should be narrated in the notice itself? 3. Whether the First Appellate Court is correct in rejecting the evidence of P.W.2 to P.W.4, simply they are friends of the Appellant, when there is no contra evidence and legal reasoning to reject them? Notice. Private notice also permitted....
Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Rajapalayam Vs. Saraswathi a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award made in M.C.O.P.No.1 of 2010, dated 30.03.2011, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred on behalf of Oriental Insurance Company Limited, calling in question, the award made in M.C.O.P.No.1 of 2010, on 30.03.2011, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur. 2. The respondents 1 and 2 are the claimants in the aforementioned petition. The third respondent is the owner of the offending bus, which was found responsible for causing the fatal accident that occurred on 21.08.2009, at around 11.45 a.m., near Lorry Owners' Association building situated on Rajapalayam - Srivilliputtur main road. The husband of the first respondent herein and father of the second respondent, by name, Sri....
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »