Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Parnaba Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice of Election, dated 03.07.2016 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct the election in view of rules framed under Sec. 5 of the Indian Red Cross Society Act and pass such further or other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. It is represented on behalf of the second respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli that by means of proceedings dated 16.07.2016, bearing Letter No.A5/2273/2016 of the second respondent, notice of election dated 03.07.2016 was revoked. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
V. Ramanan Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle amount, provident fund, earn leave salary, medical leave salary, retirement arrears amount, commutation, gratuity etc., with interest at the rate of not less than 10% from the date when the same balance due i.e.from 31.05.2016 till the date of actual payment to petitioner.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the...
M. Krishnan Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District R ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 13.5.2016 for completing the enquiry pending before the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.7210/2013/Aa4, dated 27.11.2015 and to pass appropriate orders on merits and to cancel the joint patta and to issue the patta in the name of the Petitioner to the Petitioner's land in S.No.320/2 measuring an extent of 1 acre and 74 cents situated at Seevalsiraku Village, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, his father Muthuveeran had two brothers (1)Katalagan and (2)Vellaisamy and in fact, his father and Katalagan had died and the Petitioner is the legal heir of his father Mu...
A. Mithun Chakravarthy Vs. K. Phaindra Reddy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying this Court to punish the Contemnors/Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to punish them for their wilful and wanton disobedience and non compliance of the interim order passed by this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2014.) 1. There is no representation on the side of the Petitioner at the time of calling of the matter. However, there is representation on the side of the Respondents 1 to 4. 2. It comes to be known that the Petitioner has focussed the instant Contempt Petition before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for their wilful and wanton disobedience and non- compliance of the interim order passed by this Court in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2014. Earlier, this Court, in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.19928 of 2014, dated 9.12.2015, filed by the Peti...
S. Mohan Vs. The District Collector, Pudukottai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to give electricity service connection to the petitioner house comprised in S.F.No.206/2 of Mattur Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukottai District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed for providing electricity connection to the petitioner herein. 2. The petitioner is said to be in possession and enjoyment of the house situated in S.F.No.206/2 of Mattur Village, Pudhukottai District. According to him, he has made a representation on 27.03.2016 to the third respondent herein seeking electricity service connection. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court has already considered the issue involved in the Writ Petition in W.P.(MD).No.3769 of 2013 with certain conditions. He further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a simil...
A. Chinnaiyan Vs. The District Collector, Trichirappalli District, Tri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third respondent from drawing the high tension line in the petitioners property in S.No.262 for an extent of 22 cents in Pirattiyur Village, Trichy West Taluk, Trichy District and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 22.06.2016 made by the petitioner.) 1. This writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third respondent from drawing the high tension line in the petitioner's property in S.No.262 for an extent of 22 cents in Pirattiyur Village, Trichy West Taluk, Trichy District and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 22.06.2016 made by the petitioner. 2. Mr.M.Murugan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R.1 and 2 and Mrs.Srimathi, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for the third respondent. 3. Considering the limited scope of the...
C. Subbiah Poosari Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitabl ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation and to regulate the administration and payment of remuneration to Poosaries-Schedule of the Temple on the basis of his representation dated 22.1.2016 within the time to be fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. It is the case of the Petitioner that his representation, dated 22.1.2016 addressed to the Second Respondent and another representation, dated 28.6.2016 addressed to the First Respondent are pending as on date, without any progress or disposal in the subject-matter in issue. Therefore the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition before this Court. 5. In view of the above, this Court, at this stage, without dwelling deep into the merits ...
S. Annamalai and Others Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to settle petitioner's retirement benefits including Gratuity, Provident Fund, Earned Leave Salary with enhanced dearness allowance fixed by the Government of Tamil Nadu and dearness allowance arrears on petitioners monthly pension as revised and increased from time to time together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of settlement.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the pe...
Mariappa Thevar Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering in the peaceful possession of the property in Town Survey Number in T.S.No.850, measuring an extent of 187.51 sq.ft within which Western Peacock Mandapam is situated as per the decree dated 24.4.1988 in O.S.No.724 of 1982 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Palani by considering the representation of the Petitioner, dated 12.5.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents 1 and 2 and the Learned Additional Government Pleader for the third respondent. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3. 4. According to the Petitioner, the Third Respondent claimed the property as referred to above, as one be...
R. Samudrapandian Vs. The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.02.2015 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court and thereby regularize the petitioner's service as well as to pay the salary for the period between 14.09.2013 to 10.12.2013 subsistence allowance for the period 11.12.2013 to 17.12.2013 and to pay the salary for the period from 18.12.2013 to till date and further directing the 3rd respondent to pay the salary to the petitioner every month continuously.) T. Raja, J. 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners has circulated a letter to the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed....
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »