Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Secretary to Government, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to allow the above writ appeal by setting aside the order dated 17.11.2009 made in W.P.(MD) No.1151 of 2009.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Secretary to Government, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, and three others, who are respondents in the Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.1151 of 2009, challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge, allowing the writ petition by order dated 17.11.2009. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for the purpose of disposal of this appeal are narrated as under: 2.1. The respondent in this appeal is the writ petitioner and he filed the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.1151 of 2009 to quash the order in G.O.(D) No.215, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, dated 19.06.2008 which is an order passed by the Government, enhancing the punishment given to the writ petitioner, by the original authority, in exercise of the power of s...
N. Vanjimuthu Vs. The Competent Authority/ The District Revenue Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Roc.No.53200/2004/C4 dated 14.01.2016 and the consequential proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.745/2000/A1 dated 29.01.20916 and the impugned attakshi dated 25.02.2016 for sealing the premises, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to remove the seal and hand over possession of Hotel Swagath (Hotel Senthil Residency), Old Door No.109, New No.6, NVGB Hall Road, Nagal Nagar, Adiyavithu Village, Dindigul East Taluk to the petitioner pending disposal of the I.A. No. 3 of 2016 ini O.A. No. 19 of 2011 on the file of Special Court under TNPID Act, Madurai.) 1. The petitioner challenges the orders passed by the first and second respondent respectively which led to the sealing of the hotel premises, which was under his occupation, namely Hotel Swagath (Hotel Sen...
V. Vijayendran Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime), Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to initiate enquiry and to take necessary action on the petitioner's complaint dated 17.06.2016 within the period stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to initiate enquiry and to take necessary action on the petitioner's complaint dated 17.06.2016. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that petition enquiry is pending in this case, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, ...
C. Vinodh Kumar and Others Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.2 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal.) 1. Section 482 Cr. P.C., saves inherent power of the Court. Such inherent power can be exercised either to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Invoking such inherent power, this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings on the ground that the continuance would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. 2. Acase in Crime No.2 of 2016 has been registered under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act by the 1st respondent against the petitioners. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Gover...
B. Loganathan Vs. Inspector of Police, Lalapettai Police Station, Kuli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: (in Crl.R.C.(MD) No.212 of 2016): Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, dated 22.03.2016, in C.M.P.No.1046 of 2016 in P.R.C.No.II / 2014 in R.P.No.111 of 2014 and return the properties to the petitioner. Prayer: (in Crl.R.C.(MD) No.213 of 2016): Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 r/w 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, dated 22.03.2016, in C.M.P.No.1205 of 2016 in P.R.C.No.II / 2014 in R.P.No.8 of 2014 and return the properties to the petitioner. Prayer: (in Crl.R.C.(MD) No.214 of 2016): Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 r/w 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, dated 22.03.2016, in C.M.P.No.1206 of 2016 in P.R.C.No.II / 2014 in R.P.No.11 of 2014 and return the prop...
Velammal Vs. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.145/2015/A1 dated 26.02.2016 and quash the same.) T. Raja, J. 1. When the matter was taken up in the first call, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, in order to provide one more opportunity to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the matter was passed over in the morning session and again, it was called at 2.15 p.m. Even then, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Thus, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for 'non-prosecution'. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed....
The Management Muruga Home Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner N. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of Writ Court dated 12.10.2007, made in W.P.(MD)No.7620 of 2006.) 1. These intra-court appeals are directed against the common order dated 12.10.2007 in W.P.(MD)Nos.7620, 7618, 7619, 7617 and 7621 of 2006 and the common order dated 17.10.2007, in W.P.(MD)Nos.4184, 4185, 4183 of 2006 and 6653 of 2005 respectively, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge negatived the prayer to quash the order passed by the competent authority under the Minimum Wages Act, directing payment of differential wage with penalty. 2. The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.1220 of 2008 is at the instance of Southern Cottage Beedi Manufacturers Association and the prayer is to direct the first and second respondents to finalize the fixation of rates of minimum wages for workers in Beedi Industry by adopting zonal wise minimum wage fixation based on the cost of index numbers of Nagercoil or Madurai, in terms of Section 3(3)(a)(iv) ...
Pon. Vembadian Vs. The Secretary to Government (Expenditure), Finance ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the order made in G.O.(2D)No.4, dated 13.01.2006, passed by the second respondent and the consequential order made in G.O.(2D)No.39, dated 23.04.2010 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. ) 1. This Writ Petition is directed against the non-speaking order passed by the first espondent dated 23 April, 2010, modifying the order passed by the second respondent dated 13 January, 2006, whereby and whereunder, punishment of stoppage of increment with cumulative effect for a period of four years was converted into one of stoppage of increment for a period of three years without cumulative effect. BACKGROUND: 2. The petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Inspector in Local Fund Audit Department. Subsequently, he was promoted as Assistant Director. 3. The petitioner married a woman belonging to Most Backward Class ...
M. Chellamuthu Vs. Sengalmalai Arulmigu Varadaraja Perumal and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order dated 09.09.2015 made in I.A.No.683 of 2015 in O.S.No.312 of 2015 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Karur.) 1. Invoking the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this memorandum of civil revision has been filed by the first defendant in the suit challenging the order of the trial Court dated 09.09.2015 and made in I.A.No.683 of 2015 in O.S.No.312 of 2015 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Karur. 2. The first defendant in the suit O.S.No.312 of 2015 is the revision petitioner herein whereas the respondents 1 to 3 are the plaintiffs. The fourth respondent herein being the second defendant in the suit had passed away. The respondents 1 to 3 herein have filed the suit O.S.No.312 of 2015 as against the revision petitioner/first defendant as well as against the remaining defendants seeking the following reliefs: a) granting a de...
St. Mary's High School, Kuthukalvalasai, Tenkasi, Represented by its C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders for granting salary grant for the teachers of the Petitioner School for the period from 1.6.1997 to 8.6.1998 by correctly appreciating the students strength based on the records by considering the appeal petition submitted by the Petitioner School dated 11.4.2016, within the time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner/School, its representation/appeal petition, dated 11.4.2016 addressed to the Second Respondent/The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006 is pending in the subject-matter in issue without any progress or disposal till date. 5. It appears that the Petitioner in the representation/appeal...