Chennai Madurai Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Ramakrishna Tapovonam, Rep. By its Secretary, Tiruchirappalli Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No. 1743/2015/A3 dated 01.09.2015 passed by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same.) M. Venugopal, J 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed set of papers of the writ petition, which runs as under: I may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the main order dated 27.08.2015 in a fresh writ petition and then render justice. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Dr. J. Jebasingh Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the first respondent State Government vide G.D(D).No.729, Health and Family Welfare (A1) Department dated 15.06.2015, quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to give promotion forthwith to the petitioner herein as Associate Professor (Medical Oncology) in one of the existing vacancies by re-drawing the promotion panel and placing the petitioner at Rank No.1.) 1. Aggrieved by the impugned G.O(D).No.749 Health and Family Welfare (A1) Department, dated 15.06.2015, issued by the Principal Secretary Department of Health and Family Welfare, Chennai, the petitioner is before this Court. 2. Taking through the said Government Order, Dindigul District 15.06.2015, particularly, paragraph No.4 of the said Government Order, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when there is a ...
Merlin Jeba Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to release the Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-37-BK-7484 seized by the Second Respondent on 4.7.2016 to the Petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, her Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-37-BK-7484 was seized by the Second Respondent/The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Kuzhithurai at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, on the allegation that the vehicle was employed to transport 270 liters of white colour kerosene. After seizure of the vehicle, the Second respondent registered a case in Cr.No.115 of 2016, in respect of the alleged offence under Clause 17 of Tamil Nadu Kerosene(Regulation of Trade) Order, 1973 r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities...
R. Kamalambal Vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Thanjavur D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to sanction education loan of Rs.4,21,740/- to the petitioner's daughter namely SIVARANJANI for pursuing her B.E (Information Technology Course) in Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram by considering the petitioner's daughter's educational loan application dated .......2015 and the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2016 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner, her husband died leaving behind her and her two daughters. It is her case that the whole family is depending upon her income and she is working as an Anganwadi worker, in Child Development Programme Department. From her meagre income, her family is leading a life in a poverty line. She is the only earning member of her family and her parents were also died. 3. The stand of the petitioner is that ...
E. Devaraj Vs. The District Collector, Theni Distict and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 herein(Tahsildar and Village Administrative Officer) to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2014 and to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to investigate and rectify the mistakes in the village records like adangal, chitta and to direct the fourth respondent to maintain proper upkeep of the village records, more particularly, for S.No.498/2, S.No.538/3, S.No.461/d and S.No.301/1, Silvarpatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, the Village Accounts Book is to be maintained as per G.O.No.581, dated 3.4.1987. He owns lands in S.No. 498/2, measuring an extent of 0.72 acres in Patta No.998, S.No.538/3 Punja 0.180 Ares in Patta No...
Stalin Vs. The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance ofWrit of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to grant parole to petitioner's father Jacob, S/o.Masilamani, aged about 74 years, Convict, who is now confined in Central Prison, Trichy from 06.07.2016 to 18.07.2016.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to grant parole to the petitioner's father Jacob, S/o.Masilamani, aged about 74 years, Convict, who is now confined in Central Prison, Trichy from 06.07.2016 to 18.07.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. Brief Facts: 3. The petitioner's father, namely, Jacob was initially acquitted in connection with the case in C.C.No.31 of 1999 on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam; that thereafter an appeal was preferred by the State before ...
A. Maharaja Vs. The Branch Manager, Dindigul District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation, dated 7.6.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
V. Vignesh Raguram Vs. The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to introduce a monthly billing facility to the Domestic, Non-Domestric Electricity consumers based on petitioner's representation dated 09.12.2015 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This writ petition has been instituted by a consumer of electric energy seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to introduce a monthly billing facility to the domestic and non-domestic electric consumers, taking into consideration the representation said to have been submitted by the petitioner on 09.12.2015. 2. The writ petition, in our opinion,, is a misconceived one. The State Government in consultation with the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO), has been coming up with schemes duly fixing the slab rates of consumption charges for the electricity energy at reasonable tariff t...
Nambi Thevar Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the respondent 4 to appoint a fit person or Thakkar to conduct the temple festival which is going to be held on 18.07.2016 to 20.07.2016 under the direct supervision of the Respondents 2 and 3.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed set of papers of the writ petition, which runs as under: With the liberty to file a petition before the 4th respondent to decide the matter immediately, I withdraw the writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the 4th respondent/Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Endowment Board, Thoothukudi District, for redressal of his grievances in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law. No costs....
M. Rajiv Pandian Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Rep. By i ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-15-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to allow the appeal and set aside the order of the learned Judge of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.(MD) No.4301 of 2014, dated 25.06.2014.) Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This Writ Appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner whose writ petition has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge by the judgment rendered on 25th June, 2014. 2. Various public sector oil companies have notified for selection of dealership called as Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak (RGGLV). The notification was published on 29th May, 2013, in Daily Thanthi publication of Tamil language and also other newspapers in English language. Of them, the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation has proposed to establish one such dealership at Ammaiyanayakkanur of Nilakottai Taluk of Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu. As is also required of such companies to observe principles of reservation while selecting the dealers, representing all the relevant social segments, this particula...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »